Political Diary
New Delhi, 2 May, 2017
Naxals: Wake Up
Call
WILL MODI WALK HIS
TALK?
By Poonam I Kaushish
Sitting ducks, a tale of how 99-strong CRPF troops were easy
prey for 300 Maoists in Chhattisgarh's Sukma district last week resulting in 25
massacred. The second deadly attack in less than two months which left 12 dead
and the third in seven years. Underscoring, tall talk of containing internal
terrorism is simply banal and a hog wash!
Yet, post assault, things ran par on course. Union Home
Minister Rajnath Singh called an emergency meeting of top security officials,
asserting, “This cold blooded murder showed the Naxals' frustration over the
success of our crackdown operations in the recent past.” Sic. Tweeted Prime
Minister Modi, “Cowardly and deplorable. The sacrifice of the martyrs will not
go in vain, we have taken the attack as a challenge and will enforce the
State’s writ.”
Really? Then why hasn’t accountability been fixed? And heads
not rolled? Will the State admit it has blood on its hands? Specially, after
the DGP CRPF accused the Chhattisgarh Government for being laggard in
constructing the road in the Maoists den. Shockingly, the road, where the
attack took place has been in the making for years.
More scandalous, the security personnel have been crying
hoarse for new technology which shortens construction time of one km road to
just two days. Alas, this proposal too has been gathering dust for three years with
the State Administration. Alongside policemen acknowledge they were soft targets
due to the route’s predictability for the road construction side.
Undeniably, the Naxalite menace continues to tear asunder
with lethal precision the Indian
State. Equally, it
showcases the lack of political will, utter confusion and exposes the Central
and State Government’s soft under-belly in their anti-Naxal armour, slack
coordination and no cohesion between the forces on the ground.
Moreover, the attack highlighted lack of unified strategy
and actionable intelligence. Failing to realize that knee-jerk operations will
not yield results, instead it would put security forces at risk. Alongside, the
Centre’s much-hyped policy on tackling Red terror is caught in a time wrap.
One-step-forward-two-steps-backwards.
Asserted a senior police officer, “There is a lot of
vacillation and ad hocism, whereby counter-Naxal strategy and attacks have been
outsourced to the Central security forces.” Consequently, with the Central
forces playing the role of a supporter and not a lead force to the State, the
fight against Maoists is manifest by massive confusion and operational weakness
with both accusing each other of failure.
Questionably, how does the Centre intend fighting the war?
Does it know the DNA of Naxalites? What fuels their movement? Have an
iron-tight anti-Naxal policy in place? A realistic and accurate assessment of
the challenge? Are the Reds driven purely by the “robbing Peter to pay Paul”
syndrome? Can an honorable cause and an eventual utopian outcome justify
violent means? Is violence consistent with the norms of democracy?
Tragically, the Government is insensible of how it should
tackle the growing menace. At last count Maoists had spread their poisonous
tentacles in 20 States and 223 districts (7 States have already slipped beyond
State control). Worse, they have assumed alarming proportions, ratcheting up
the stakes at a potent level to destroy democracy and replace it with anarchy.
Undoubtedly, both the Centre and State need to get their act
together, take the bull by the horn and realize that anti-Naxal operations are a
chronic terrifying black hole. For starters, the Centre must rid itself of
finding political and bureaucratic solutions instead get security and
intelligence experts to strategize tactical requirements to contain this.
Intelligence sources assert the Maoist game plan is to
occupy the countryside, surround cities until they can force regime change.
Simultaneously, they want to transmute the social structure through the barrel
of the gun. Towards that end, they are getting moral & material support
from Nepal, China, and Pakistan’s ISI, Lashkar-e-Tayiba,
HUL and other Islamic terror outfits. Their ambition: Have a ‘red corridor’
from Pashupati to Tirupati.
Sadly, for a year, the Government has talked ad nauseum
about its ‘anti-Naxal strategy’ couched in jingoistic jargon of “challenge,
clear, development” et al. Used grand
language like tackling terror “on the political, security and development
fronts in a holistic manner". Failing to realize that impressive
catchphrases don’t add up to well-thought of strategies. Instead they only
allude to a mumble-jumble of intentions and wishful thinking at best and
complete catatonia at worst.
Shamefully, New
Delhi is fighting this violent movement with not even
one tenth of the total security forces required to contain it. Worse, more than
30% of the Centre’s outlay towards modernization of the police in the Red
corridor hasn’t been released. Of the amount released only some has been used.
Frankly, our war against Naxalism is slowly turning out be a
one-sided bloody affair, as Maoists dominate a battlefield of dispirited and
ill-prepared security forces with no credible intelligence flow. The level of
their sophistication in inflicting large-scale casualties on civilians and
security personnel with minimum damage to themselves exposes their superiority.
In addition, the tribals' feels if security forces could be
killed where do we go? So willy-nilly they start obeying the so-called diktats of the Naxalites. This gives
impetus to other groups to attack elsewhere. True, the Adivasis are a
disadvantaged lot. Chhattisgarh’s Bastar which lies in the heart of Maoist
territory ranks as one of the poorest districts in the country. Sans basic
amenities, roads, no medical facilities and means of income almost
non-existent. Development is only a word parroted by the polity at election
time.
However, at the same time beyond the Adivasis' abject
poverty is a skillfully orchestrated charade that serves the interests and
ulterior motives of the Red brigade. Recall, prior to the State’s anti-Naxal
operations and Salwa Judam in 2005, the Reds were busy hampering development
and creating a fear psychosis. Bluntly, the Maoists facade of social movement
hides a sinister design: usurpation of political power.
What next? First, New
Delhi must clearly define and acquire resources to
contain if not annihilate the enemy. There should be planned deployment of
time-bound resources imposed by the conflict. The Government needs to remember
that if there is a disconnect between its objectives, tactics, resources and
ground conditions, all stratagems and measures are rendered redundant.
Two, the State must lay calculated emphasis on
intelligence-led targeted operations seeking out the leadership, rather than
dissipating the forces on chasing cadres, seize and hold the initiative that it
has long relinquished, instead of concentrating on territory. Given that the
Maoists follow the ‘fish in water’ policy: which renders the guerrilla soldiers
indistinguishable from common citizens.
Three, there must be a clear determination to contain the Naxalites
on their peripheries, to engineer their expulsion from areas in which their
influence is nascent, and ensure that they are not able to expand into new
areas. As also deal
with distortions in the social system on a war footing to alleviate poverty,
ensure speedy development and enforce law and order strictly.
Time to send a clear message that senseless violence
wouldn’t be tolerated. Remember, nations live or die by the way they respond to
a challenge. Do our leaders have the stomach? The ball is in NaMo’s court. Can
he walk his talk? ----- INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|