Budget Spotlight
New Delhi, 3 February 2017
Budget Thrust
RURAL INDIA &
MASSES
By Dhurjati Mukherjee
Notwithstanding the Opposition’s concern over the presentation
of the Union Budget before ensuing elections to five States, the fact is it is mature
and pro-growth and is geared towards development of the rural and agricultural
sector. The emphasis towards development of social infrastructure as also the
rural sector has rightly been taken care of.
The Government’s thrust was manifest in the President’s
address to both Houses of Parliament, where he clearly stated that poverty
eradication was a priority as also ensuring ‘universal basic income’ for all,
keeping in view the conditions of the poor, the dalits and the kisans, who
still struggle for a decent livelihood. While the need for social security for
the downtrodden has been often heard, its implementation has been a matter of
concern with the question where would the resources –anything between 4 and 5
per cent of GDP—come from?
While the thrust on rural sector is much on similar lines as
the previous year’s Budget, the fact is that it deserves the attention in
revamping the infrastructure facilities. Even if providing urban facilities in
rural areas (PURA) may take time to be accomplished, given resource
constraints, there is need to focus and transform our villages.
This is exactly what Union Finance Minister Arun Jaitley has
done. The total allocation for agriculture and rural sector has been a record
of Rs 1.88 lakh crores, which definitely needs appreciation. While MGNREGA has
theoretically received the highest allocation of Rs 48,000 crores with the
avowed objective to create assets to improve productivity, it is imperative
that for current schemes to continue at the prevalent rate another Rs 10,000
crores would be needed. Thus, along with wage arrears this would total to over
Rs 13,000 crores by the end of the current financial year and the actual
allocation comes to around Rs 35,000 crores, less than the allocation in
2016-17.
Other significant steps include: Creation of Dairy
Processing Infrastructure Development Fund with an allocation of Rs 2000 crores
to help gear up processing capacity of an additional 500 lakh litres of milk
every day; Preparation of a modern law on contract farming to be sent to States
for adoption and higher productivity for fragmented plots; Coverage of Fasal Bima Yojana increased from 30 to
40 per cent and allocation of Rs 9000 crores made for this purpose though the
sum is less than Rs 13,240 crores, as per RE of 2016-17; Setting up a dedicated
Micro Irrigation Fund the goal of “per drop, more crop”; 648 Krishi Vigyan Kendras
(KVKs) to have mini labs to enable soil testing.
Though all the above may be encouraging, the amount going towards
research and education of agriculture is a meager Rs 6800 crores, which is way
below one per cent of the agri GDP. This must be considered as experimentation
and innovation for higher yields is necessary to ensure that farmers’ income be
doubled by 2022. Even though making this ambitious resolve of Finance Minister
a reality may be very difficult, it is pertinent that if the focus is
maintained on improving agriculture, there could be some increase in farm
income.
The importance given to agriculture in rural sector is justified
following a Twitter poll conducted by the Ministry of Finance, just before the
Budget, which showed there were 66 per cent of around 21,400 respondents
seeking a more agriculture focused Budget. As agreed, problems in the sector
are many but the most important is that the average size of the farm is 1.15
hectares and is likely to shrink further in 2020-21. And, as per 2013 Situation
Assessment of Farmers/Agricultural Households, one cannot earn a living from a
smaller farm less than one hectare. Besides, other major problems are those of finance,
marketing and availability of inputs at affordable rates.
A point that needs mention is that there should have been an
initiative to increase at least by 15 or 20 per cent the number of KVKs in the
country. We have been hearing the need for lab-to-land approach for decades and
unless technology is made available at the sub-divisional levels, farming problems
cannot be resolved. Such KVKs could guide farmers on diversification of
agriculture, organic methods, dryland agriculture, less reliance on chemicals
etc.
Some experts have pointed that the bulk of farm credit
outlay of Rs 10 lakh crores, for which an interest subvention scheme of three per
cent is provided if paid back in time, will be availed by the agri business
companies and not farmers. Estimates suggest that roughly Rs 8 lakh crores out
of the amount would go to the corporate in the name of farmers. Instead, there should
have been some form of debt relief to farmers by reducing interest on loans, if
not striking a portion of the farm debt outright.
The Government’s resolve to address the shelter needs of the
poor and EWS is too in the right direction. Affordable housing for all by 2019
and building one crore homes are significant announcements. Accordingly, the
allocation for Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana has been hiked to Rs 23,000 crores
and it is expected that strict monitoring at the grass-root and panchayat level
would ensure the houses are constructed, as per standards. The push to
affordable housing is expected to have a positive impact not just in core
construction sectors but also in lending business of banks, NBFCs and credit
takeoff, which is the need of the hour.
Another significant announcement has been achieving 100 per
cent rural electrification by May 2018. Indeed, power supply should be at least
for four to five hours so that the benefits of power could be derived by the
beneficiaries as many work in their homes to earn a living or supplement the
family income. Besides, allocation of Rs 10,000 crores for the Bharat Net
project is expected to spur rural connectivity as it will provide high-speed
broadband to 1.5 lakh gram panchayats.
As regards health, the allocation of a mere one per cent of
GDP is not quite satisfactory to tackle the growing quantum of diseases.
Moreover, there is inadequate health infrastructure in the backward
sub-divisions of the country, specially in northern and north-eastern States. There
is need for health centres in each block and small hospitals in each
sub-division, equipped to treat patients of all types of diseases, except
infectious and complicated ones. The Budget resolve to upgrade 1.5 lakh such
Sub-Centres into Health & Wellness Centres is a positive step but more
needs to be done.
The other essential announcement is the target to abolish TB
by 2025. According to Global Tuberculosis Report 2016, India accounts
for 24 per cent of the global cases. It is expected that in the coming nine years
or so, TB which affects mainly the poorer sections, would be abolished or
drastically brought to nominal levels. It may also be noted that the increase
of rural sanitation allocation would steadily control open defecation and help in
preventing communicable diseases.
In the realm of education, the stress would be on spread of
science, local innovation and gender parity. But the spend in this sector has
not received the boost that was expected as perhaps the Government is looking
at the private sector, which has turned higher education into a safe business
for itself. The allocation for Sarva Siksha Abhiyan is marginally up by 4.4 per
cent while that of higher education is at a standstill at Rs 1300 crores. The
only redeeming feature is the proposal to launch Skill Acquisition and
Knowledge Awareness (SANKAPL) at a cost of Rs 4000 crores, which would impart
training to 3.5 crore youth.
In sum, though a section of economists and planners cry hoarse
over the Government providing and/or increasing subsidies to the farmers and
rural poor, it needs to be noted that the corporate groups get more subsidies,
directly or indirectly. While the business houses claim that such subsidies are
aimed at adding to the GDP of the nation, those given to the farming community
are for producing food for the country as also for their struggle for survival.
Moreover, looking after the interests of the poor and the downtrodden and
ensuring for them a better livelihood cannot be termed ‘populism’.
As is well known, the transformation of the rural sector has
become imperative as India
emerges a powerful force in the world. As such, the thrust given to it is the
need of what one could call ‘real development’. The benefits of it must reach
the masses, whose living standards need a boost and must be brought into the
mainstream of life and activity. ---INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|