Open Forum
New Delhi, 15 Dec, 2016
HC On Triple Talaq
WELL BEGUN IS HALF
DONE
By Oishee Mukherjee
The recent judgment of the Allahabad High Court on triple
talaq has come at a very opportune time when the Supreme Court is examining the
issue, with women and social activists demanding it be abolished. In an
observation, Justice Suneet Kumar had stated that the “Muslim husband enjoys an
arbitrary unilateral power to inflict instant divorce” while also pointing out
that personal laws cannot claim supremacy over the rights granted to the
individuals by the Constitution.
Obviously, women cannot continue be at the mercy of the
patriarchal set up held under the clutches of sundry clerics, having their own
interpretation of the Quran. The judgement reiterates the need for a uniform
civil code as an imperative need given that gender equality and the dignity of
women have become critical issues in the modern world. Even the Prime Minister has
on occasions denounced the practice of triple talaq as one that goes against
the rights of women, even going to the extent of ruining their lives.
Lately, the Law Commission very rightly pointed out that the
introduction of a uniform civil code, that would include scrapping talaq,
should come from the people. In this connection, Justice BS Chauhan, a former
Supreme Court judge, stated that the Commission would shortly submit its report
to the Government after examining the overwhelming response received from the
public.
Another significant observation too has been made by the
National Commission for Women (NCW) which has told the Supreme Court that
triple talaq was unconstitutional and had played havoc with the lives of innumerable
women. In its affidavit filed (on November 5) to the court, the Commission
stated: “These practices – triple talaq, nikah halala and polygamy – should be
strictly prohibited. The NCW is supporting the stand of the Union Government
and is adapting the affidavit filed by it”.
As is well known, the Centre had filed its affidavit in the
apex court on October 7 and requested the abolition of triple talaq and
polygamy, terming them unconstitutional customs hurting general equality and
women’s dignity. The Centre pointed out
that one section of women in society could never be worse off than others. Thus,
it urged the Supreme Court that keeping in view that women must be treated as
equal partners in development, “any practice (triple talaq, and polygamy) which
denudes the status of a citizen of India merely by virtue of the
religion she happens to profess is an impediment to that larger goal”.
In fact, women activists, even those belonging to Muslim
communities, want this talaq travesty be done away with to ensure that women
are no longer exploited. If there is
need for a debate, it should be between knowledgeable persons from the Muslim
community who are well-versed about their religion and the views of
fundamentalists need not be considered, Modi observed recently.
The Centre, which wanted abolition of these traditions calling
them “unconstitutional customs” further stated that inequality amongst women
itself was not acceptable. It has cited the example of several Islamic nations such
as Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan,
Morocco, Tunisia, Turkey,
Indonesia, Egypt and Iran, which had reformed their laws
to give women equal rights in matrimony. Obviously, these nations have followed
the Quran and deliberated on the issue before taking this decision.
The fact that Muslim countries, where Islam is the State
religion, have undergone extensive reform, it is imperative that the practices
need to be changed here as these “cannot be regarded as an integral to the
practice of Islam or essential religious practices”. Moreover, there is the critical
aspect of personal laws being in consonance with the Constitution of the
country.
It would be well-worth mentioning a blog, titled Triple
Talaq and the Government‘s Affidavit, where Finance Minister and eminent lawyer
Arun Jaitley posted in Facebook comments which highlight the fact that in the
past too, the State reformed personal laws through legislation. He recalled
that the previous Government, headed by Manmohan Singh, had amended the
Marriage Laws (Amendment) Bill to give women, in case of a divorce, half of the
share of her husband’s residential property, regardless of whether the property
had been acquired before or after marriage.
While it is indeed distressing that these laws are still
prevalent in our country when many Muslim nations have reformed theirs, it is
our political class which should be held responsible for being complacent and accepting
or allowing these barbaric personal laws of Muslims to be still prevalent. Unequal
representation in the decision-making process is no doubt a hindrance towards
the ideal of gender equality. Moreover, in a liberal country like India, these
should have been reformed long back. Some social scientists believe that lack
of adequate women in politics may also be reason for these laws still prevailing.
In a changing world, women should, rather must be considered
equal partners in social and economic development. With women constituting
nearly 50 per cent of the population, it is crucial for democracy that they be
given equal status and that gender equality, irrespective of caste, class and
creed, be the rule than an exception. However, one has to admit that in spite
of the wave of modernity that has swept the country, in most spheres of life, there
is still manifest exclusionary practice against women. A research study
recently pointed out that there has been deterioration of the values of
equality, structural arrangements for promoting inclusiveness and issues
concerning representation.
In this age of globalisation and rapid social change,
governments must adjust to keep pace with current trends, irrespective of what the
fundamentalists advocate. Though in
recent times, there has been awareness of the need to give women their due
place in society, the scenario is somewhat different in most rural areas of the
country, where education and awareness levels are sadly low.
At the same time, it is gratifying to see a section of women
becoming increasingly assertive of their rights, implying their socio-cultural
diverse norms in a particular territory. That is why women’s groups have united
to protest against injustices committed against them, including the barbarian
systems prevalent in Muslim personal law.
It may not be wrong to say that the prevailing situation has
witnessed a change with the present government too being in favour of giving
women their rightful place in society. But corresponding with women’s
assertiveness over their rights, the attitude of men too has to change as they need
to realise that patriarchal dominance has no place in a changing society.
Slowly and gradually the tolerance levels are going to diminish. The value
system has changed worldwide and India should not be lagging behind.
---INFA
(Copyright,
India News & Feature Alliance)
|