Political Diary
New Delhi, 1 November 2016
“I Would Be In
Jail”
Kiska dand AUR kiski laathi?
By Poonam I Kaushish
“If Amar was not there I would have been in jail.” A
criminal’s confession who rightfully needs to be behind bars. Of course, if the
guilty happens to be an aam aadmi.
But certainly not if the person concerned is a khaas aadmi, that too India’s ex-Defence Minister and UP
Chief Minister Mulayam Singh.
This my dear readers, is the biggest dhamaka in the ongoing cat and mouse power game between baap-beta Mulayam and Akhilesh with
uncle Shivpal as kabab mein hadi in
the Samajwadi Parivar. With Assembly elections due early next year the stakes
for Lucknow gaddi’s have sky-rocketed and is up for
grabs. What is on display is a naked and
ruthless lust for power.
Worse, the Samajwadi supremo’s admission has been met with
deafening silence by our polity, even arch opponents Congress, BJP and
Mayawati’s BSP have turned a blind eye. As also law enforcing agencies, police,
income tax, Central Bureau of Investigation even the judiciary.
None want to ask simple questions: What was Mulayam’s crime?
What deal was struck and with whom? And who prevented him from being
jailed? Who stalled the investigations?
Why did the CBI not net him?
Darlings, welcome to the sordid underbelly of sleazy
politics. Call it plutocracy (rule by wealth) or kleptocracy (rule by theft)
either which way netas of all shapes and sizes, hues and colours, communal and
secular flock together collectively coo there’s
nothing’s wrong.
The name of the game is quid-pro-qous and
you-scratch-my-back-I-scratch-yours. Why? One, because sab ek he thaali ke chhatee
batte hai, it’s like the pot calling the kettle black. Two, all care a
rat’s ass for principles, values and morality.
And the less said the better of the CBI whose fatal
attraction for political cover-ups and clean chits have made it into the
Central Bureau of convenience, connivance and corruption, with the devil taking
the hindmost!
Recall, after the SP lost power to the BSP in UP in May
2007, the CBI tells the Supreme Court it had found prima facie evidence against
Mulayam, sons Akhilesh and Prateek and daughter-in-law Dimple to launch
criminal investigations. It registers a disproportionate assets case against
them for amassing over Rs 100 crore between 1993-2005 parts of it coinciding
with Mulayam’s tenure as UP Chief Minister (2003-7).
In March 2008 the CBI seeks expeditious disposal of its
plea. On July 8 the Left Parties withdraw support to Manmohan Singh’s UPA
Government over the Indo-US nuclear deal. And on the same day, Mulayam announces
support of his 39 MPs. Predictably the Government sails through the trust vote.
Following this Dimple immediately shoots off a letter to the
Prime Minister denying allegations that she held benami property on behalf of the family. In November then Solicitor
General Vahanvati opines her assets cannot be clubbed with Mulayam’s as she
“held no public office”.
In December the CBI seeks withdrawal of its case against the
Yadavs. However it does a volte-face in March 2009 and tells the Supreme Court
it wants to proceed against them. The same time, the Congress and SP fail to
strike a seat-sharing pact for the Lok Sabha elections.
In December 2012 as the Court starts hearing the case, the
UPA again seeks Mulayam’s help to elect Pranab Mukherjee as President and pass
the Food Security Bill which he has vociferously been opposing for months. In another
somersault in 2013 the CBI changes its mind and closes the DA case against
Mulayam due to “grossly insufficient evidence”.
Not only Mulayam ditto is the CBI’s tryst with his
compatriots Mayawati and BJP’s Karnataka Chief Yeddyurappa. In 2003 the CBI files a case against Mayawati
in the Taj Corridor scam barely a month after she severs ties with Vajpayee’s NDA
Government.
Between 2003-2007 the BSP extends outside support to the UPA
and the CBI files a closure report in the Taj Corridor case. But the CVC, under
whom the CBI functions dramatically contradicts it claiming enough evidence is
there to prosecute her.
However, in May 2007 when Mayawati ascends UP’s throne, the CBI despite being
ready to prosecute her is refused permission by UP Governor TV Rajeswar,
reportedly close to Sonia Gandhi. Ironically, barely a month after Mayawati quits
the UPA in 2008, the CBI registers an FIR against her in another
disproportionate assets case, an offshoot of the Taj Corridor case.
The Supreme Court questions the CBI in 2012 stating the agency
has exceeded its mandate by investigating a case without permission from either
the Court or the State Government. Arguably, why did the CBI not appeal the
Court order despite claims of having incriminating evidence against Mayawati? Also,
the Court has still not taken away the CBI’s power to proceed against her in
another DA case?
Yeddyurappa’s case too runs on parallel lines. He is
convicted by Karnataka’s Lokayukta for favouring mining companies in return for
gratification and quits as Chief Minister in 2011. Today with BJP at the
Centre, a special CBI court has acquitted him.
Clearly, in this game of political dumb charades successive
Governments have used the CBI as a hand maiden to dance to its tune. A
toothless tiger to help friends settle political scores with opponents, thereby,
raising serious doubts about its honesty and integrity of purpose to weed out
the corrupt.
Is the CBI more sinned against than sinning? Are politicians the main culprit? The truth
is mid-way. Over the years, the CBI has adopted an opportunistic policy of
playing safe with Governments of the day. Both work in tandem in furthering
their own interest. Consequently, the system becomes self-perpetuating whereby
threatened political elite have given more and more powers to the CBI to get
their way and have their say.
Thus, in this game of lies, deceit and deception, the UP
drama reflects the emerging truth of today’s India. Power is all. Arguably, one
can say this is what democracy is all about. Or should one say business of
democracy.
Sadly, the tragedy of Mulayam’s saga is that it has not made
any iota of difference or guilt among our teflon-coated politicians who
continue to be fair game and ply whatever you want: Lay down any law, bend any
rule, change any order, transfer any person and fudge figures.
What next? Time we put in place a clear and transparent
regulatory framework and stop crony capitalism. Our netagan need to cry a halt to political cronyism wherein it spills
over into the business world; self-serving friendships and family ties.
Corrupting public-serving economic and political ideals.
The nation demands, its polity to be whiter than white
otherwise they are not fit to do the job. It is high time to cry a halt to
increasing degradation by conducting our own due diligence, else we lay the
foundation for a weak and pliable polity. We need an effective vetting process
of the real chaal, charitra & chehra of
our leaders.
Prime Minister Modi has oft spoken about ushering in
transparency in governance. It is high time the CBI is truly independent, stops
being His Masters Voice and prevents abuse of power. Undoubtedly this would be
a formidable task given that the agency needs purging of “yes men” and cleansed
of backdoor instructions. There is no point in initiating a biased
investigation which does not guarantee a fair probe.
At the end of the day, are we going to mortgage our
conscience to corrupt and tainted leaders?
Public accountability is indispensable in a democratic set-up. The powers-that-be must desist from
playing further havoc. Who will cast
the first stone? Kiska danda, kiski laathi aur kiski bhains? ---- INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|