Open Forum
New Delhi, 29 July 2016
Increasing Centralization:
LET STATES HOLD THE PURSE STRINGS
By Dhurjati Mukherjee
Some Chief Ministers have alleged that the State Governments
powers are being usurped by the Centre. This was made plain at the Inter-State
Council meeting recently. Undeniably, there has been a trend towards
centralization of the polity wherein States have very little say in matters
concerning them, national level issues are a far cry.
In fact, its is alleged, and quite justified, that the
Centre has been quietly shifting subjects from the ‘State List’ to the ‘Concurrent
List’ and from the ‘Concurrent List’ to the ‘Union List’.
True, Prime Minister Modi delved on the theme of cooperative
federalism but in reality inter-action with States does not take place. Think.
The meeting of the Inter-State Council was being held for the first
time in 10 years.
Add to this, after the winding up of the Planning
Commission, the Niti Aayog does not
hold consultations with State Governments about their demands. This is not all.
Not a few States pointed out that the Centre keeps disregarding the
recommendations of the Aayog just as
it ignores the States’ views.
Importantly, as the Council meeting was held after the
Supreme Court’s verdict on the role of Governors, there was much
dissatisfaction among the non-BJP ruled States.
Apart from the West Bengal Chief Minister, those from Bihar,
Delhi and even
the Punjab Dy Chief Minister (BJP ally) complained that States were being
denied a say in the decision-making process. Scandalously, even the agenda for
the meeting was not discussed with the States.
While Tamil Nadu and many others criticized the shortfall of
funds for education, West Bengal underscored that
any move for pushing certain kinds of ideologies and doctrines into the
syllabus in the name of improvement would be stoutly resented.
The Centre on its part highlighted the need for Sarva Siksha Abhiyan and emphasized that
there was no reason whatsoever for lesser funds in this very important sector.
However, the most contentious matter was the Punchi
Commission recommendations. Wherein, Articles 355 and 356 are proposed to be
amended to enable the Centre to bring specific trouble-torn areas under its
rule for a limited period.
Along-with amending the Communal Violence Bill to allow
deployment of Central forces without State consent for a short period. This
again, not a few felt, was an attempt by the Centre to interfere in the
functioning of the States.
Raising a moot point: Can these activities not be carried
out by the States? Do they need the help from the Centre? Are the States
incapable of looking after internal security?
Meanwhile, State Governments finances are quite critical whereby
the “States may collapse under the weight of repayment dues and interest burden
by 2016-17”, warned Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee. Interestingly, she was
supported by a few of her counter-parts. All stressed that in a federal polity,
the Centre should find a way out of this impasse.
Alas, the federal character of the country remains only in
theory. Realistically speaking, the most important financial powers remain in the
hands of the Central Government. Even the recent episode in Arunachal Pradesh underlines
the fact that if the judiciary was not strong, the Central Government would merrily
continue to topple Governments in Opposition ruled States.
Undoubtedly, the current trend towards centralization is
nothing new. It started with Indira Gandhi whose centralization not only unified
the opposition but also denigrated the Congress Party’s institutions, leading
to its weakening over time.
In addition, during UPA-1 and II, the central Congress
leadership constantly interfered in the affairs of States, deputing both weak
and strong central leaders, such as Prithviraj Chavan and Virbhadra Singh, to
govern Maharashtra and Himachal.
Consequently, the High Command’s interference not only disturbed
political dynamics in the States, weakened Party unity and increased
factionalism. Worse, bowing to the High Command culture even today keeps its
central leadership disconnected from various local organizations. Predictably,
this led to the weakening of the Party organization and was largely responsible
for its failure in the 2014 general election.
Obversely, Modi too has followed the same strategy and some
believe that the current centralization is in line with that of Indira Gandhi,
possibly the first Prime Minster to concentrate power in the Prime Minister’s Office.
But the centralization of power in the Executive is not
unique to the Centre. In contemporary India, most States are governed by Chief
Ministers who have centralized authority in their own offices.
The power exercised by Mamata Banerjee, Jayalalithaa, Badal
family, Naveen Patnaik, and the Yadav Parivar
in Uttar Pradesh is well known to need recounting. Control over patronage
necessitates the accumulation of power in the offices of the Prime Minister and
Chief Ministers.
Additionally, to subvert the arrangements in the
Constitution, the Centre would often impose ‘super tax’ on top of income tax
and appropriate the entire revenue collected therein on the ground that it was
not part of income tax collection.
Similarly, it would often impose an additional or special
excise duty and appropriate the entire collection from it on the plea that it came
under the purview of the Finance Commission Award.
Besides, the trend towards centralization, as States have rightly
pointed out, is only manifest in States which usurp powers of the panchayats and municipalities and plan
for projects.
This tendency is again manifest in the zilla parishads which rarely consult panchayats at the sub-divisional and village levels to ascertain
the projects they need and want to be implemented in a particular year. Distressingly,
economic decentralization has yet to become a reality in our country.
Sadly, decisions making in gram panchayats and other tiers of the State machinery which
involve the community are not being followed. Gandhji’s view of involving the
people and ushering in a system of decentralization --- be it in the political
or economic realm ---- is not being adhered to.
Clearly, our politicians plan according to their own
perspectives, read their own interests on projects dear to them which take
precedence, while others are ignored.
Appallingly, the Centre too is following this policy wherein
it does not think it necessary to consult States in vital matters such as
internal security, education, health etc. Whatever little consultation takes place
is because of the pressure of Parties which are in the opposition in States but
strong in Parliament.
Obviously, when the Congress has not adhered to Gandhiji’s
philosophy of ushering in true decentralization, why expect it from the BJP-led
NDA Government.
In sum, the course correction can only happen if there is a
change in perception about the need for decentralization. India’s
leaders, from Prime Minister Modi to Chief Ministers must pay close attention
to how they manage their tendencies to centralize.
They must tread a path wherein they maintain control over
their respective administrations and organizations but at the same time provide
room for political ambition to reside under their wings. ---- INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|