Open Forum
New Dehli, 15 July, 2016
NA’s
Naïve Prescriptions For Cities
WHO
WILL PROVIDE ACCOUNTABILITY?
By
Proloy Bagchi
Niti Aayog’s CEO Amitabh Kant underscored
the criticality of cities to pull up the country by its boot straps recently.
Primarily, because they are vital to the Government’s missions to boost
economic growth and lift the people economically. Be it flagship programmes
like Make in India, Skill India, Digital India or Smart Cities,
in each one cities play the most important role in rolling them out and
accomplishing them.
They are also essential for tracking
economic growth, job creation and delivery of good quality life to citizens.
According to Kant in today’s world it is not countries but cities which compete
for resources and investments consequently, they should become distinct units
of governance and economy. Towards that end one needs to track cities’
performances vis-à-vis GDP, job
creation, private and public investments and consumption.
Unfortunately, the Janaagraha’s annual reviews show Indian cities in very poor light.
While London and New York score 9+ in a 0 to 10 scale, our
cities score a poor 4. This non-profit organisation’s aim is to strengthen
democracy by working for citizen-participation in urban local Government. Besides,
lobbying the Centre to extend the 74th Amendment for more representative local
urban Government.
Notably, the Niti Aayog Chief has
enumerated four key systems of good governance of cities: One, urban planning
and design, two, municipal finances and staffing, three, effective political
leadership, four, transparency, accountability and citizen-participation.
True, Kant has come forward with solutions
to rectify and overcome shortcomings of our cities along-with the “what” and
“how” to achieve it. Wherein, Chief Ministers should attach greater importance
and priority to cities along-with paying more attention to them by preparing a
blue print for a city’s long-term development for 20-30 years.
At the same time, they should devise a
short term plan with sectoral objectives for 3-5 years fixing roadmaps and
milestones and allocating responsibilities for delivery which should be
monitored to check progress of objectives and, presumably, if necessary, take
action for course correction.
Dissatisfied with the current staffing of
municipal corporations, Kant feels short tenures for municipal commissioners
are not conducive to productive work. He is also against the culture of
obtaining officials/officers on deputation from State Governments as it vitiates
the organisational culture. “The rolling stock of ‘deputationists’ destroy the
coherence of the organisation as the ‘deputationists’ seldom develop any stake
in the organisation.
All this is well and good! However, in
describing the modus operandi for making cities units of economic growth, the
Niti Ayog CEO has missed out one vital link. Namely, he has written about what
is wrong with cities and how to go about mending the breaches that have
occurred. But he has not said who will go about correcting everything that has
gone wrong.
Bluntly, to his “what” and “how” what needs
to be added is “who” will accomplish what Kant wants to be done with the
cities, critical as they are to the country’s economic progress. According to
him, Chief Ministers need to pay more attention to cities. But the reality is
that a city administration is already beholden to the State Government for
finances. Interestingly, The Economist magazine too opined that Indian local
bodies are subsumed in the Government which surrounds them.
Consequently, in this highly politicised
environment driven by the art sycophancy, every political animal tends to
ingratiate himself with the powers-that-be wherein the larger interests of the
city and its people are not all important.
Besides, the Chief Minister has his own
agenda – obliging his sycophants, relatives and friends, industrial cronies and
construction or builders’ lobbies. Specially, the realtors as they contribute
money to the Chief Minister for his personal use or for his Party. A case in
point: Bhopal’s
City Development Plan has been delayed by ten years due to them.
Resulting, in the World Economic Forum
finding these sectors highly corrupt with the mark-up on project costs being as
much as 50 per cent. Leading to quality suffering, potholed roads within months
of building/relaying, water pipes repeatedly leaking with unconscionable loss
of millions of gallons of precious water and sewers breaking down. Sadly,
nobody is ever brought to book.
Questionably, in a milieu wherein Chief
Ministers are reportedly corrupt political animals who will take care of the
cities? Add to this, every individual or organisation has developed vested
interests wherein they hardly ever act according to what the general public
wants or needs.
That's why in this mess there is no
accountability. Shockingly, one Madhya
Pradesh Minister admitted to me that the State had no system of accountability.
No wonder, Indian cities are in such poor shape.
As a result in this perverse processes of
planning and design, transparency and accountability – Kant’s first to fourth
systems of good governance – are pushed out of the window. There are numerous
instances of cities acquiring ungainly sprawls without any concern for urban
design or planning, conservation of environment, availability of civic services
etc.
The precious commodity of land is
distributed using rules or bending them for cronies with deep pockets who have
no hesitation in emptying them for favours by politicians. In fact, cities are,
milked by Chief Minsters and their cohorts to fill their coffers and/or of
Parties they belong to for capturing and/or retaining power.
Therefore, to expect the
busy-in-politricking Chief Ministers to actively involve themselves in building
citizen-centric cities is a dream that only Kant can see sitting in his Niti
Aayog office.
The Aayog’s CEO’s two other key systems of
governance – municipal finances, staffing and effective political leadership –
also suffer from the malaise outlined above. State politics ensures depressed
civic taxes to keep the municipalities always in financial doldrums, read
dependent on the State.
Scandalously, vested interests take care of
staffing. Deputations are not sinful per
se; they are so only when deputation is used to fill posts which can be
manned by the municipalities’ own employees. But no, here too sycophancy and
politics take over so that political lackeys can be provided with sinecures.
As for political leadership one can only
look up to the Mayor who in most cases is the Chief Minister’s or the Party’s
man and accordingly is largely ineffective, more so if his Party does not have
majority in the Municipal Council.
Clearly, politicians have vitiated the
system of governance in the country, including city administrations with only
one objective – maintaining status quo so that the system continues to remain a
milch cow. Having been part of the system and seen Government functioning at
quarters, Kant strangely expects politicians to disturb the status quo to their
own disadvantage. Isn’t it naive on his part to do so? ---- INFA
(Copyright, India News and Feature Alliance)
|