Economic Highlights
New Delhi, 1 February 2007
Avoid
Fiscal Contradictions
Separate Budget from Policy Measures
By Dr. Vinod
Mehta
Just on the eve of the budget, the media is full of
speculative news about cut in tax exemptions and subsidies. Yet when the actual budget comes there is
neither reduction in subsidies nor cut in tax exemptions. The old things continue.
For the last five decades it has been observed that
the annual budgets are used to make major policy announcements, which are not
conducive to long-term savings and investment decisions. Many a time these
policy announcements upset the market expectations and lead to volatility in the stock market. The time
has come to think whether we should continue to make policy announcements
during budget presentation or separate policy announcements from budget.
Budgetary exercise is essentially
an exercise to balance the revenues and expenditures of the Government and it
should be treated as such. It is not the place to make economic policy
announcements, which is a much more serious matter than the balancing of
receipts and expenditures. Moreover, latching economic policy announcement to
budget is leading to contradictions in many areas without in any way providing
solutions to serious issues.
One has been hearing about curtailing tax exemptions
and levying taxes on savings at the time of final withdrawal for the past few
years. But when it comes to taking a
final decision the Government develops cold feet. So is the case with
subsidies. For the past several years,
the nation has been discussing the
rationalization of subsidies and every time on the eve of a budget anti-subsidy
feelings are taken to new heights to find that the subsidies instead of being
cut are in fact raised.
The handling of the question of subsidies and cut in
tax exemptions call for a serious holistic approach and cannot be tackled in
the annual budgetary exercises.
Admittedly, there are a large number of tax exemptions especially to the
corporate sector and that savings are tax free at every stage. For instance,
when one puts money in Provident Fund or puts money in specified bonds one gets
a rebate up to Rs. one lakh and when the final amount is withdrawn the
accumulated interest is also not taxed i.e., the final withdrawal with interest
earning is also tax free. So the argument goes why one should get tax exemption
twice for the same saving? Therefore it
is argued that at least the accumulated interest on savings be taxed. The Government
is convinced of this reasoning but saving public is not pleased.
Again, subsidies are an accepted norm in modern
societies and cannot be wished away. The
important thing, however, is for what purpose the subsidies are being given and
which group(s) stands to benefit from them and whether there are any bad side
effects of these subsidies. The second
aspect of this is that these should be administered in a cost effective manner
and that the continuation of a particular subsidy is reviewed periodically. This is the case in most of the developed
countries. For instance, the public
transport system, school level education, primary health care, etc. are
subsidized in most of the developed countries and the quantum of subsidy
reviewed periodically.
Therefore, there is nothing wrong in giving subsidies
so long as they serve a useful social purpose. Let us take the case of
subsidies on fertilizers. This is one single subsidy which everyone knows is
only harming the nation, but the vested interests are so strong that no Finance Minister has been able to garner
enough of courage and do away with it in one stroke.
It is common knowledge that the use of chemical
fertilizers beyond a certain point is an environmental hazard. Its long term-use not only pollutes the soil
but also spoils the health of the people who eat the produce of such
farms. By keeping the prices of
fertilizers artificially down, we are only encouraging the misuse of fertilizer
on a large scale. One fails to understand that in a country of over one billion
people and the largest number of cattle in the world can't we have sufficient
organic manure to replace the use of fertilizers?
Since fertilizers have been made so cheap that it is
not economically possible to invest
funds in improving the quality of organic manure, which is environment friendly
as well as health friendly. Recently the
Government approved to clear subsidy on fertilizer to the tune of Rs. 34,000 crore by March 31 this year.
Stop the subsidy on fertilizer and let the farmer buy
it at the market prices. Its consumption
will go down and, importantly the farmer will now make an efficient use of it
and many of them would even switch over to organic manure. If the fertilizer
companies find it uneconomical to operate without any subsidy then let them
close down their shop and invest the money in producing organic manure.
Therefore, delink the question of subsidy from the
budget and let the Government state a policy as to what subsidies will continue
and what subsidies will be retained. It
may be better to do away with subsidy on fertilizer in the next few years so
that the farmers are mentally prepared to buy their requirement of fertilizer
at market prices, have time to switch over to use of organic manure as well as
give sufficient time to fertilizer companies to either reduce their production
costs or switch over to the production of organic manure or
bio-fertilizer. At the same time the
Government should come out with an agricultural policy in its totality
including the scientific research so that the country is able to produce more
than what it requires in the coming years.
Similarly, the subsidy on food also needs to be
streamlined. As of today a large part of
this subsidy goes to meet the expenditure on FCI. Firstly, the Government has to borrow heavily
from the bank to buy food grain from the farmers to store in FCI godowns. Secondly, it has to pay the maintenance
expenditure to keep these stocks in silos.
On the top of it, it has the whole machinery of rationing staff all over
the country to implement this scheme. If
the idea is to provide cheap food grains to the poor then the best way would be
to issue them food coupons. The poor can use these coupons to buy their food requirements from the market. The cost of administration would be much
lower than the current food subsidy.
As a principle, the commercial activity should never
be subsidized except in exceptional circumstances. There is no need to subsidize exports. It is
high time the Government comes out with a working policy paper on its idea
about eliminating/cutting tax exemptions and the extent of desirable subsidies
or otherwise for each sector of the economy; let the average citizen and the
experts react to it and then the Government should finalize its overall policy
towards tax exemptions and subsidies.
With interest rates lower than what they were a few
years ago and with the Government pushing the average citizen to equity
market/mutual fund the citizen should be able to take right decisions about his
savings and investment decisions. Since
these are essentially long term
decisions the clear cut policy on tax exemptions will help one to take informed
decisions on savings and investments. So is the case with subsidies. It should come clean on the question of
subsidies and end once for all the speculative stories about tax exemptions and
subsidies. It will also end volatility
in the capital market, which always follows ad hoc announcements in every
budget.
All these are policy issues.
They need to be de-linked from the annual budgetary proposals. There should also be nothing secret about the
budgetary proposals. They should be
discussed the whole year round and
announced at the appropriate time. There
should be only marginal changes in the tax rates with a view to balancing the
receipts and expenditure. ---infa
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|