Round The World
New
Delhi, 22 June, 2016
Orlando Killings
US’s NEW TERROR REALITY
By Amrita Banerjee
(School of International Studies,
JNU, New Delhi)
The toxic
forces of global jihadist terror, lax gun control laws and pernicious
homophobia converged recently at a gay club in Orlando, Florida.
The outcome was the deadliest mass
shooting in the history of United States and the nation’s worst terror attack
since 9/11.
Shockingly,
a US-born son of Afghan immigrants 29-year old Omar Mateen killed 50 people and
injured over 53 using both a handgun and a “long gun”, an AR-15-style assault
rifle.
This
bloodshed, marking the 16th mass shooting during the Barack Obama’s Presidency underscore
the plague of peaceful American society: Gun proliferation bolstered by Constitutional
protection under the Second Amendment and relentless lobbying on Capitol Hill
by the National Rifle Association with its deep pockets.
Mateen,
who ranted about gay people in the past, meticulously targeted the gay
nightclub, reflecting the persistence of deep prejudices about the community,
notwithstanding the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark decision nearly a year ago
upholding marriage equality.
While the
latest attack is another grim bookmark in the annals of gun control reform and
hate crimes against the LGBT community, the standout dimension of the incident undeniably
is the creeping menace of “lone wolf” attacks linked to the Islamic State (IS)
and a prognosis for the American
Security State.
Notably, the
surest sign of the heightened political temperature surrounding domestic
terrorism came from the instant reactions of the two Presidential candidates,
Republican Donald Trump and Democrat Hillary Clinton. While both focused on scoring political points, neither sought to tackle the phenomenon of
mounting lone wolf attacks.
Earlier,
Mateen on a call to the 911 emergency line had sworn allegiance
to IS. Experts noted that
such a pledge is considered a core element of the IS “protocol”. Last December,
the San Bernardino California attackers posted such an oath of
allegiance on Facebook.
Such
public pledges prior to a violent attack eerily mesh with the recent
exhortations of IS spokesman Abu Muhammad al-Adnani, who extolled supporters to
kill innocents in America and
Europe during the holy month of Ramzan.
Importantly,
hate crimes in the US
have become a part and parcel of American life today. This has raised many
critical issues impinging on the polity and social fabric. One, it raises
questions about the level of acceptance of the LGBT community in America.
Pertinently,
the bar under attack was supposedly "the hottest gay bar" in Orlando which usually
hosted its "Latin flavor" event every Saturday night. From the
beginning, it has served as a place of love and acceptance for the LGBTQ
community.
Reiterated
Obama, “it is a place of solidarity and empowerment where people have come
together to raise awareness, to speak their minds and to advocate for their
civil rights”. However, the remorseless killing of predominantly Latino LGBT
people is shameful.
Two, how
does one ensure that firearms do not fall into wrong hands. The cold reality in
America
is that persons with a dubious record can also get gun licences by taking
advantage of the Constitutional ‘right to bear arms’, a provision which has
been very loosely interpreted.
A catalyst
in this appalling situation is the clout that the pro-gun lobby like the
National Rifles Association (NRA) enjoys. President Obama who waxed eloquently
in favour of a stricter gun policy before he was elected had to tone down his
opposition to the NRA because the latter is politically too powerful to be
antagonised.
A clearly
dismayed Obama even admitted the difficulty of passing legislation or even
addressing the gun control issue in a gridlocked Washington of entrenched political
interests.
True, the
White House goes all out to express its determination in putting an end to the
gun menace whenever there are serious incidents like the April 2007 Virginia
Tech case and the December 2012 Connecticut Sandy Hook Elementary School killing.
Alas, such
resolve does not go beyond rhetoric. Undoubtedly, the national failure to
address gun violence in a meaningful way is one of the embarrassments of this
age.
Moreover,
the Administration’s travails are compounded by a judiciary which has put its
foot down against any wholesale ban on firearms. It endorses only reasonable
restrictions on ownership and the right to carry a weapon from place to place.
Three, the
Orlando
killings, is an act of domestic terrorism, a violent crime to intimidate or
coerce civilian population by means of mass assassination or destruction to
draw the Government’s attention to their cause.
Significantly,
Mateen’s apparent motivation and behaviour, fits this definition. Consequently,
this unfortunate incident is both a hate crime and America’s new home grown terror
reality, a pure act of cowardice that urgently needs to be addressed.
Categorizing
mass violence motivated by bigotry as domestic terrorism would also compel the
Federal Government to study, monitor, track, prosecute and ultimately prevent
the hateful actions of demented individuals.
Certainly,
the Obama Administration is right in viewing Islamic State not as some far-away
militia which poses no threat to the US, but as a dangerous group whose
hostility to the country can have immediate and terrible consequences
especially when the perpetrators are acting on their own without direct orders
or support from the organization.
True, not
all Muslims should be blamed for the acts of fanatics and fundamentalists. Notwithstanding,
the attacks were denounced by numerous groups, including the Vatican, Afghan
President Mohammad Ashraf Ghani and the Council on American-Islamic Relations,
it is vital that the Federal Government allocate resources towards countering
violent extremism by hate groups which target communities of colour, gender and
faith.
Succinctly,
unquestionably hate violence stubbornly persists in the US and
Americans must mount multi-pronged, structural approaches to confront it.
Whereby, in order to address the roots of hate violence perpetrated by
individuals it must come to terms with the structural inequities in America. A crucial
reason why most mass shootings occur and the country endures a steady parade of
such killings.
Clearly,
the cycles of economic, education, incarceration and housing policies which abandon,
criminalize and disenfranchise black, brown and minorities foster an
environment in which hateful individuals feel empowered to violently target
already marginalized communities.
Thus, without
overreach that would amount to curbing civil liberties, America’s surveillance
and security apparatus would have to respond with a higher level of creativity
to deal with lone wolf strikes because in the US it is all too easy for a
psychotic, bigoted or unstable individual with leanings towards jihadist
extremism to act out his beliefs in a land that has one gun for every human
being.
Last and
most important, the FBI should also conduct its investigation with more
precision as records suggest they had already interviewed Mateen twice and let
him free as there was no evidence of terror links.
Surely,
the FBI can control this ‘lone wolf menace’ considerably if it maintains a list
of suspicious people and does not let them go from their radar and continuously keep vigil even after they
are given clean chit. ---- INFA
(Copyright, India News and Feature Alliance)
|