Political Diary
New Delhi, 7 June 2016
Apna Sapna Money Money!
TIME TO ABOLISH
RAJYA SABHA
By Poonam I Kaushish
Now days when you see someone holding his nose you don’t
know whether it’s pollution or politics. Either way the net result is the same.
Increasing political pollution replete with contaminated smog, toxic waste and
sleazy fumes.
The latest in an ever-growing series of political
skullduggery is on full public display in the on-going Rajya Sabha biennial
elections. A gory account of money and more money. Epitomising as never before
that polls are all about sleaze baby!
Who cares? Join the celebrations by our Right Honourables as
another bastion of our young democracy comes crashing down. A “sting” by a TV
channel purportedly showing Karnataka JD(S) and Congress legislators
negotiating money in crores in exchange, for their votes in the biennial
elections to four Rajya Sabha seats from the State.
More. Another channel showed a Congress candidate and
independent legislator reportedly speaking about getting enhanced development
funds for the constituency by the State Government in return for votes.
Followed by an ever so predictable reaction by our netagan.
Asserted Chief Minister Siddaramaiah, “Congress never done
such things.” Really? The BJP accused the ruling Congress of having Rs.100
crores to give to those supporting it along with other benefits. While former
Prime Minister Gowda rubbished his son-in-law’s role in the Cash for Vote Scam.
Big deal. Alas, it is an open secret that Rajya Sabha is today
a “bought” House whereby like elections to the Lok Sabha, polls herein too have
become big business. Shockingly, the figures for ‘buying’ the required number
of votes range from Rs.20 crores to Rs.30 crores. The going rate per vote is
said to be Rs. 5 crores to Rs.10 crores.
Not a few consider this as a good investment as once elected
the MP has a sum of Rs 5 crore annually (Rs 30 crore for 6 years) under the MP
Local Area Development Scheme (MPLADS), to “spend” read do as they please, as
he has no particular constituency per se, unlike his Lok Sabha counterpart.
Remember BSP Chief Mayawati let the cat out by virtually
auctioning the House nomination to the highest bidder a few years ago. Wherein
she reportedly openly extolled her MPs had to “donate” their MPLADS if they
wanted her to nominate them to the Rajya Sabha.
Any wonder, with each passing year the character and quality
of the Rajya Sabha is sharply deteriorating. Personal loyalty to the leader,
monetary considerations and political connections get precedence over
competence and experience.
Worse, the Council of States has failed to evolve a distinct
role for itself as the torch bearer of the State’s concerns and is functioning
more and more as a parallel (and competing) political chamber to the Lok Sabha.
If one had hoped that the Supreme Court would set things
right it was not to be. It held that a candidate need not be a domicile of a
State from where he seeks elections. Thereby, opening the floodgates of
powerbrokers and Lok Sabha losers finding ‘safe’ Rajya Sabha seats for a price
and more.
Bluntly, the States’ voice over the years has got lost in
the din of the power brokers and the money bags, who strut about like peacocks
in the changing Rajya Sabha kaleidoscope. Shouting has replaced serious debate and
the polity has converted the Rajya Sabha into an invoice for self and pelf.
Arguably what is it about the Rajya Sabha that has money
bags, powerful industrialist and power-brokers panting to get a slice of the
action? Succinctly, power. Discredited ex-MP and ‘King of Bad Debts’ Vijay
Mallya was open about how he had ‘intoxicated’ Karnataka MLAs with his money to
wean a seat courtesy Gowda’s JD (S) and BJP.
Why? When he had it all? In a chat with me, he asserted: “I
have the money to buy everything but the trappings of power. As MP I can walk
into any Minister’s or babu’s room
and he has to attend to me. I can raise any issue, insist on being heard even
make outlandish demands, peddle influence etc”.
Scandalously, MPs are members of Standing Committees in
which they have business interests. Take Maharashtra’s
newspaper baron Vijay Darda and Reliance Petroleum’s director YP Trivedi both
were part of the Standing Committee on Finance and the Consultative Committee
of Commerce and Industry Ministry.
Ditto were the cases of Bihar’s
pharmaceutical tycoon Mahendra Prasad aka
'King Mahendra', Andhra Pradesh’s tobacco exporter and liquor distributor
Sambasiva Rao and industrialist MP Srinivasulu Reddy. Jharkhand’s
Ahmedabad-based Reliance’s Industries Corporate Affairs Chief Parimal Nathwani.
Karnataka’s mining magnate Anil Lad is member of the Standing Committee on
Science and Technology, Environment and Forests.
Indeed, the Standing Committees on Finance, Commerce and
Industry, Public Accounts Committee and Public Undertakings Committee are
highly sought after. Primarily because these committees enable them to work
directly with the Minister or Ministry, summon officers generating a lot of
clout and being in an advantageous position to influence decisions.
According to National Election Watch 98 MPs have assets
worth crores (Congress 33, 21 from BJP and seven from Samajwadi) and 37 MPs
have criminal cases pending against them. Industrialist like Kingfishers Vijay Mallya,
Videocon’s Rajkumar Dhoot, BP’s Chandrasekhar, Reliance’s Parimal Nathwani,
‘King’ Mahendra etc underscore how
business interests are now operating in Parliament.
Clearly, the Rajya Sabha is seeing diminishing returns role.
Unfortunately, the House is not what it was intended to be. Recall, our
Constitution-makers wanted it to consist of persons of experience and eminence
than those in the Lok Sabha.
It was intended to give an opportunity to seasoned people,
who may not be in the thickest of political fray, but who might be willing to
participate in the debate with an amount of learning and importance which one does
not ordinarily associate with the House of the People.
What next? The time has come to re-write rules that govern
membership to Parliament. One view is that the Rajya Sabha could still be made
to play a more useful role. JP strongly favoured a Partyless Council whereby
only those who had served one stint in the State Assembly or Lok Sabha and no
more than two terms should be made MP.
Today, we have MPs enjoying four-six terms of six years each
in the Rajya Sabha without ever fighting an elections to either State Assembly
or the Lok Sabha!
I personally feel one should abolish the chamber, as
advocated by leading MPs at different times. Significantly, Dr. Ambedkar
himself went on record in 1949 to say that the Rajya Sabha was being introduced
“purely as an experimental measure” and there was provision for “getting rid”
of it.
Morarji Desai, for his part, was one with Harold Laski’s
view that “a single chamber best answers the needs of modern states.” Why
should the tax payer be financially burdened with unelected MPs whose only
contribution is serving their self interest?
Clearly, the Elders must set their House in order, or else
the coming months will decide whether the Rajya Sabha will make Indian politics
more messy and unworkable. What the Upper House desperately needs is more
substance than style. Else its anthem will soon ring to Apna Sapna Money Money! --- INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|