Political Diary
New Delhi, 10 May 2016
It’s Raining
Freebies
IT’S GOVT MONEY,
NOT MINE, YAAR!
By Poonam I Kaushish
It is a perfect electoral cake rolled out by various Parties
to the strains of ‘Vote For Me.’ Iced with luscious lip-smacking freebies galore
for one and all. From the aam aadmi
to the debt-ridden kisan to the top
tax payer. To cream the electorate at the husting.
Wherein sound economic sense has been surrendered to
political gamesmanship with reckless promises being made by Parties on the assumption
that populist promises yield better electoral rewards than reasoned issues and
sustainable programmes. Who cares? After all promises are just promises. And
Government money is nobody’s money!
Witness how our netagan
are raining populist schemes and loan waivers in five poll-bound States,
merrily converting political sops into vote percentages. And social and economic upliftment is weighed
on the scales of vote-bank politics.
Leading the pack is none other than Southern belle AIADMK
supremo Jayalalitha who woos her voters with 8 grams of gold, free mobiles-laptops
50 per cent subsidy for women to buy scooters, mopeds and 100 units of free
power for two months, Rs.40,000 crores in loans for farmers and Rs 18,000
maternity aid and nine months leave from 2016-21 for women.
Not far behind is DMK’s Karunanidhi who assures free smart
phones, 3G/4G connections, tablets for 16 lakh school students, cheaper milk, loan
waivers and complete prohibition. In Assam Congress’s Chief Minister Tarun
Gogoi offers a job to one member of each family and give benefits to poor
families whose annual income is less than Rs 2.5 lakh. Continuing her Ma-Mati-Manush talk Mamata harps on her
development agenda for a “New Bengal.”
Undeniably, populism is not a new phenomenon and election
2016 is no different from previous polls. In the last over 50 years this
‘catch-all’ politics has reared its ugly head in various forms. The ball was
set rolling by the DMK in Tamil Nadu in 1967 when it guaranteed rice at Rs 1.
In Andhra TDP’s Telgu bidda
NTR Rama Rao followed suit by promising rice at Rs 2 per kg in 1983 and made it
into a symbol of victory. Then came the disastrous “loan melas” of the late eighties followed by the era of gifting
colour TVs, fans, sewing machines, saris to voters.
Congress’s Indira Gandhi heralded political one-upmanship
via slogans: ‘Garibi Hatao’ in 1971, BJP followed with ‘Mandir’ and VP Singh Mandal.
Which made way for economic giveaways, Narasimha Rao’s “roti, kaprah aur makan” and Sonia’s “Congress ka haath aam aadmi ke saath.” The BJP tweaked this to ‘Bijli Sadak Paani’ which saw it wrest four
States.
In subsequent years bereft of anything knew to offer the aam aadmi ‘rice politics’ once again
took centre-stage. In 2008 Parties promised subsidized rice and grain to the
poor for Rs 1 and Rs 3 and emerged victorious. The DMK returned in Tamil Nadu,
BJP retained Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh, debuted in Karnataka and Congress
in Andhra.
True, it can be argued they Parties are obliged to be seen
as populist in the no-holds-barred free-for-all electoral race, as it would be
stupid to wish away political lollipops to entice the electorate. Raising a
moot point: Where do they get monies to fund these doles? Obviously, by taxing
us, the people.
Think. The DMK spent over Rs3,340 crores over five years on
15 million television sets, with each costing an average of Rs2,456. The AIADMK
spent Rs 2,000 crore on mixers, grinders and table fans to over 3.5 million
beneficiaries in 2013.
However, the harsh truth is that political promises in the
economic sphere should not cross the prudence limits, where it starts hurting
the economy as a whole. Notwithstanding, assurances of cheap rice, wheat or
free electricity can be justified on the grounds of acute poverty.
Besides, these concessions are imperative in a country where
40 per cent of the people live below the poverty line and over 700 million earn
less than Rs 20 a day. Is it not the duty of our jan sevaks to take care of the welfare of its people?
However, given the level of dishonesty, populism and
irresponsibility which increasingly governs our political system, these
exclusive measures announced are an invitation to disaster. None sees the
danger of economic derailment as the biggest loser are the poor, weak and
under-privileged in whose name many of the freebies are justified.
By providing free candies to the voters the masses have
become dependent on the politicians with the result that there is no true
empowerment. This has resulted in the people not being able to critically
evaluate their own leaders.
Also, given the economic logic that there is no such thing
as a free lunch, a populist scheme is invariably paid for either in the form of
higher taxes or increasing inflation. Precisely, what the mint fresh State
Governments in Assam, West Bengal, Tamil Nadu etc would have to take recourse
to.
Pertinently, in the Subramaniam Balaji vs Tamil Nadu Government case in May 2013, the Supreme Court directed
the Election Commission to frame guidelines to restrain Parties from promising
freebies to voters, so as to maintain a level playing field during elections.
“Distribution of freebies shakes the root of free and fair
elections to a large degree,” it underscored Even as it observed nothing under
Section 123 of The Representation of the People Act barred Parties from
promising voters freebies in their manifestos.
What next? One way is to make it obligatory for Parties to
inform the EC where the money will come from to implement the free giveaways
and if they will raise taxes, reduce allocation for these programmes once in
power.
Two, it would be more beneficial for Parties to offer people
permanent solutions to their problem in their election manifestos instead of a
slew of seemingly advantageous, but temporary stop-gap measures. Three, the EC
needs to penalize Parties who use the quick exploitative mechanism to win
people’s votes.
Clearly, care should be taken to draw a distinction between
welfarism and populism. Welfarism takes into account the needs of different
sections of society as a part of a large development framework. Populism is purely
guided by vote banks. Albeit, granting concessions which have no economic
rationale and are not part of the larger economic planning, as enunciated by a
Government.
Unfortunately, our policy-makers have been unable to
perceive the reality of the situation. They have consistently failed to evolve
a strategy of development which would take into account our pluralism and
fluctuating economic disparities.
It is time now for the Parties to realize that
liberalization and populism do not go hand in hand. Populism will only provide
immediate succour at the expense of the future. It is no remedy for neglect of
education and health. Faulty priorities in industrialization and
under-investment in rural areas.
The aam aadmi is
no fool. Each populist slogan only accentuates his growing awareness. The real
significance of any electoral battle is that unless the problem of poverty is
substantially resolved, violent earthquakes will continue to rock the Indian
polity, whereby it could endanger our federalism and pluralism. A Government
cannot afford to throw away money on populist whims. The time to draw a ‘lakshman rekha’ on vote bank politics.
---INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|