Round The World
New Delhi, 23 March 2016
Pokhara Dialogue
PICKING UP THREAD
WITH PAK
By Vinod Sharma
The rhetoric exchange of pleasantries and bonhomie New Delhi shared with Islamabad
on the sidelines of SAARC Foreign Ministers’ Conference at Pokhara in Nepal has again
brought the issue of bilateral relations between the two countries into
spotlight. This was the first formal meeting between External Affairs Minister
Sushma Swaraj and her Pakistani counterpart Sartaj Aziz after the deadly January
2 cross-border terror attack on the IAF base at Pathankot.
At Pokhara, Swaraj exchanged pleasantries with Aziz at
dinner, breakfast and then in one-to-one solitude, presumably to build up a
conducive atmosphere, before formally resuming the derailed dialogue process.
Expectedly, the bilateral talks centered on the Pathankot attack and Pakistan’s
lackadaisical approach in exposing the perpetrators—mainly the Masood Azhar-led
Jaish-e-Mohammed terrorist outfit. Resultantly, both India
and Pakistan
agreed to send the much-awaited 5-member Joint Investigative Team (JIT) to
Pathankot for an on-the-spot probe.
Secondly, Pakistan
also formally handed over an invitation for Prime Minister Modi to attend the
SAARC summit scheduled to take place in Islamabad
later this year. Further, both the leaders expressed hope of a meeting between Modi
and Nawaz Sharif on the sidelines of the Nuclear Summit, slated in Washington March-end. In
all, India seemed ever-eager
to pick up the threads of dialogue, badly tattered by the onslaught of mistrust
and betrayal on part of Pakistan
in the form of Pathankot attack.
Undeniably, the attack was a big shocker as India had not even come out from the feeling of
exuberance of diplomatic victory over Pakistan
after Modi’s bold initiative to unexpectedly visit to Lahore last December. The visit was indeed
historic in the wake of conflicts and disputes of a grave nature responsible to
bring the bilateral relations at their lowest ebb. But the euphoria didn’t last
long. Perhaps the “innovative diplomacy” appeared as a major threat to the
existence of vested interests in Pakistan
as well as India,
who disturbed mutual trust by executing Pathankot attack.
The tone for resuming the dialogue, before Pathankot attack,
was set in Ufa,
where a joint declaration was adopted to initiate dialogue and sort out
contentious issues—including cross border terrorism. After cancellation of NSA
level talks unceremoniously, Modi had again met
Sharif on the sidelines of Climate Change Summit in Paris, presumably to prevail upon him for
initiating peace process. Ultimately, the ice was broken in Bangkok, when the NSAs of the two countries
officially met to carry forward the dialogue.
Then was the “Heart of Asia” summit in Islamabad in which Swaraj announced to work
out bilateral talks at various levels and have a comprehensive dialogue to sort
out all issues. This led to like infusing a new blood in the cold atmosphere
and further set the tone for Foreign Secretary level talks from January 15 in New Delhi. However,
everything went haywire after the Pathankot attack on January 2. The dialogue
came to a grinding halt with both nations losing a major opportunity of
reconciliation due to cancellation of foreign secretary level talks. Yet, India continued
to hope for resumption of talks, everything got embroiled in the Pathankot
tragedy.
However, it is quite disappointing as well disturbing that
despite being given a heap of evidences on Jaish-e-Mohammed’s direct involvement
in the Pathankot attack, Masood Azhar is still at large in Pakistan. No
action taken against him and his terror outfit. Rather, it says, the evidences
provided by India
are insufficient. Annoyed by such dilly-dallying, Defence Minister Manohar
Parrikar even accused Pakistan
of being non-serious and “pretending to be asleep” on the probe.
Nearly a month ago, Pakistan
formed a new JIT to probe the attack, while replacing the earlier SIT, and
lodged first FIR in the case, that too without naming JeM chief Masood Azhar,
who India
has accused of having masterminded the strike. One can imagine the outcome of
such bushed up investigation as it seems to be destined to meet the same fate
as of Mumbai terror attack and other major attacks executed by Pakistanis on
the Indian soil from time to time.
Though terrorism and peace talks cannot go hand-in-hand, the
initiation of peace process in Pokhara is praiseworthy after a lull, provided
it results in achieving something positive and concrete in curbing militancy
and improving ever-strained relations.
Recall, India has a long history of honestly endeavoring
to have cordial relations with Pakistan.
During the previous NDA government of Atal Behari Vajpayee, many liberal
confidence-building-measures, including Delhi-Lahore bus service, were
initiated. Moreover, the historic Agra Summit was organized to resolve
long-standing issues between the two, including a proposal to drastically
reduce nuclear arsenal and issues involving the Kashmir
dispute, cross border terrorism. However, due to the adamancy of then Pak
President Musharraf, the negotiations broke down and the process collapsed,
resulting into cancellation of Agra
treaty.
Earlier in 1999, during Vajpayee’s Pakistan visit, both countries had acceded and
successfully ratified the Lahore Declaration and pledged to make joint efforts
for peace and stability in South Asia.
Instead, Pakistan imposed
Kargil war clandestinely, which was a major blow to the Lahore treaty. Surprisingly, Musharraf was
widely believed to be a strategic mastermind and brain behind the Kargil war.
Take more such examples. On June 20, 2004, both the
countries had agreed to extend a nuclear testing ban and to set up a hotline
between their foreign secretaries aimed at preventing misunderstandings that
might lead to a nuclear war. Both also agreed to a ceasefire on border posts
and fencing of the LoC. But belligerent Pakistan never adhered to its
agreements, particularly the ceasefire issue. On February 10, 2011, India again agreed to resume talks with Pakistan which
were later suspended after the 26/11 Mumbai attacks. India
had put on hold all diplomatic relations with Islamabad,
saying it will only continue if Pakistan
will act against the culprits of the horrific Mumbai attacks. After that both
the nations did not come on negotiating table till the new NDA government took
some bold steps to initiative peace process.
It is an open secret that Pakistani army and their
intelligence agency, ISI, are the two major destructive factors as far as
relations between New Delhi and Islamabad are concerned. Both of them seem to
have enjoyed supremacy over their political leadership and friendlier to
anti-India disgruntled elements working in Kashmir
or elsewhere. However, Pakistan
always remains in denial mode in accepting its involvement in terror acts, despite
fool-proof evidences. Therefore, political leadership alone is not in a
position to be friendly with India
while burying the hatchet, unless all stakeholders in Pakistan are
superseded and crushed.
Hence, the resumption of talks in Pokhara only suggest
reposing faith in Pakistan, like all earlier occasions, by the magnanimous and
peace-loving India. However, let’s hope that one day good sense prevails on Pakistan, and
it stops the acts of betrayals. Nevertheless, the resumption of dialogue will
prepare a fertile ground for the ensuing SAARC Summit in Islamabad later this year, where issues like
terrorism, regional peace, stability and prosperity as well as strong bilateral
relations will be at the centre stage. Meanwhile, Pakistan has sufficient time to
prove its credibility and trustworthiness by ensuring fair probe into the
Pathankot terror attack. ---INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|