Political Diary
New Delhi, 8 March 2016
Ishrat Jahan Political Circus
NATIONAL SECURITY
BE DAMNED!
By Poonam I Kaushish
This is a sordid saga of one of the most infamous and
controversial incidents of encounter killing in India.
In the wee hours of 15 June 2004, 19-year old Ishrat Jahan
and three others were gunned down in a joint operation by the Gujarat police
and Intelligence Bureau (IB) on the outskirts of Ahmadabad. The State Government claimed they
were members of the dreaded Lashkar-e-Toiba
(LeT) on a mission to kill Chief Minister Narendra Modi. The killing made
headlines, thanks to Jahan’s tenacious mother who moved court claiming her
daughter was innocent and killed in an audacious fake encounter.
Nine years later the CBI in its explosive 1500-page
charge-sheet held it a fake cold blooded murder resulting in seven top police
officers, a senior IB official and then State Home Minister Amit Shah languishing
in jail on the ground it had political sanction. Notwithstanding, a
Lahore-based publication Ghazwa Times quoting someone from the Lakshar’s
political arm Jamaat-ud-Dawah that
Jahan and her companions were LeT “activists”.
Jahan's name once again made it to front page headlines last
month when one of the main conspirators in the 2008 Mumbai attacks David
Headley reiterated his 2010 stand that she was indeed a LeT operative. This was
endorsed by then Union Home Secretary GK Pillai who asserted that the first
affidavit of August 2009 declaring her a LeT agent was one month later at the
behest of his boss Home Minister Chidambaram.
More shocking, Pillai implied that the LeT group was lured
to Gujarat. Added Under Secretary Mani that he
had been “coerced” by the CBI to project the encounter as fake. Chidambaram in his
defence said that as the first affidavit was filed without his approval, he was
bound to file a supplementary affidavit to set the record straight.
Predictably,
this has resulted in a BJP-Congress slugfest. While the former accused its
rival of “whitewashing” facts due to its “congenital dislike” for Modi because
it foresaw him as a “political threat”, the latter dubbed it yet “another
example of BJP opportunism and having implicit faith in terrorists and what
they say.”
Lost in the raucous tu-tu-mein-mein
was the crux: Was the teenager a terrorist? Undeniably, the first and
second affidavits contradict each other. Whereas the first shows Jahan as a LeT
operator, references to her Lashkar links have been deleted in the revised
affidavit.
True, either which way the Government machinery was abused.
Also correct it is very difficult to prove who is telling a lie as there is no
real evidence to link Jahan to LeT apart from inputs received from intelligence
officers. Pillai could face serious charges if caught about Jahan's role in LeT
plans to kill Modi.
On the other hand, Chidambaram might have to answer tough
questions if and why he is covering up the teenager’s links with terrorists.
What if the terrorists had succeeded in their plans to kill Modi? Who would be
held accountable?
Questions arise: Why did the bureaucrats not disclose this
seven years ago? What held them back? Why did Home Minister Chidambaram change
the affidavit? Why did he cover up Jahan's Let links? Who instructed him to do
so? Or is Pilli lying?
Is it fair that innocent officers should serve jail
sentences for no fault of theirs and become pawns for politicians to score
brownie points? Importantly, can one politicize national security and play
ducks and drakes with it?
The needle of suspicion squarely puts Chidambaram in the
dock. He must come clean on the flip flop and who was instrumental for the
second affidavit? Was it then Prime Minister Manmohan Singh or Congress
President Sonia Gandhi? What was the purpose of doing so?
Indisputably, the bureaucrats have once again proved how
spineless and gutless they are. Why are Messers' ex-IB Chief MK Narayanan,
ex-Home Secretary GK Pillai and Under Secretary Mani singing now? Underscoring
once again their loyalty to their kursi
comes first, followed by political mai-baaps
and the nation can go to hell.
See how once the ruling dispensation changed, like a
chameleon babus too changed colour.
All began singing like canaries. Sic. After all, closeness to powerful
political superiors is more rewarding than mere seniority or merit which helps
them to get promoted more rapidly than their performance and seniority justify.
Consequently, instead of the right man for the right job
being the criteria, there is invariably a wrong man for the right job for wrong
reasons! In fact, the political identification of officials has become so
marked that even the bureaucracy itself is able to predict as to who will
occupy which top post, if ‘X’, ‘Y’ or ‘Z’ Party or individual comes to power!
Moreover, some even succeed in bagging political offices by
obliging the right politician through thick and thin. Leading to most officials
having little interest in taking any initiatives and are willing to make self
and boss-serving compromises with the fundamentals of administration
Clearly, the steel frame has rusted and how! Averred a
retired official, “Bureaucrats were to be checks in the system. The checks have
turned into cheques while the balance is out of the window! The civil service
has become an elite self perpetuating club which protects its perks, turf and
corners all top jobs. Shockingly, for every officer who refuses to sign a file
due to political pressure, there are 10 others willing to do it.”
What next? Alas, nothing anyone has said or done so far
suggests that our leaders really wants to get to the bottom of the story, worse
our netagan’s shenanigans in
Parliament and media gives reason to believe that nothing is going to change.
Given they revel in scoring political brownie points, national security be
damned!
The tragedy of it all is that the Centre will continue to
grope in the dark about how to deal with terrorism till our leaders don’t stop
politicking on national security and the country’s security apparatus. It has
to respect the reputation of its intelligence wing and desist from giving a
communal slant to every incident.
Clearly, instead of getting into a political-intelligence
slanging match it is vital that checks and balances are put in place as IB is a
covert intelligence body and intelligence gathering a dangerous game requiring
opacity. Thus, it has to be protected and officers ensured immunity like in US,
UK,
France, Germany et al. Any prosecution would set a bad precedent for counter
terror operations thereby emboldening the State’s enemies.
Our polity must realize that beyond human frailties and
fallibilities as they exhaust precious national energy, time and money on the
Ishrat Jahan storm they should not loose sight of the larger issue of giving no
quarter to terrorism.
Time now to unearth this terror tale. We need to know the
whole truth and nothing but the truth. It’s critical for the credibility of India’s
national security, our fight against terrorism and the criminal justice
system. Else we will only prove Acharya
Kriplani right: He described Indians as the world’s biggest hypocrites and
humbugs. What gives? ----- INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|