Open Forum
New Delhi, 21 February 2008
Big Challenge To
Congress
TUSSLE OVER
TELANGANA
By T.D. Jagadesan
Rumblings in the Congress
over separate Telangana statehood continue unabated, giving an impression that these are manifestation of dissidence against the Chief Minister, Y.S. Rajasekhar
Reddy, rather than an expression of
“pro-Telangana sentiments” prevailing in the backward region. The Congress Working Committee member and deputy leader in the
Lok Sabha, G. Venkataswamy, is still in a defiant mood without caring two hoots
for party discipline or the order from the high command not to speak on this
sensitive issue.
He has emerged as the leader of a dozen-odd elected
representatives of the party from Telangana including MPs, MLAs and MLCs. This
ginger group is stepping up pressure
on the party leadership mainly to embarrass
Dr. Rajasekhar Reddy, who is perceived by them as the stumbling block in the
way of Telangana State.
Fully aware of the designs of Telangana protagonists, who
have scores to settle with him either due to ago clash or frustration over not
getting plum posts, the Chief Minister initially tried to ignore them but later
decided to take on them. Several ministers and MLAs close to him have mounted a
counter-attack on Venkataswamy’s ‘brigade”, questioning the locus standi of
senior leaders to rake up Telangana issue
when they did nothing for separate statehood during their long political
careers.
Dr. Rajasekhar Reddy himself teased these leaders with his
controversial remark that it would not be possible
for the UPA Government to concede to the demand for separate Telangana before
the next elections since there was no consensus among the coalition
constituents on the issue nd that
the Congress could take a decision
only if it was able to secure a majority and form the government at the Centre
on its own.
The Central leadership has sought to defuse the situation by
placating Telangana protagonists with assurances
that the second States Reorganisation Commission
(SRC) is on the cards to go into separate Telangana demand and that AICC
President, Sonia Gandhi, is “very much concerned over the issue” and that she would take an appropriate
decision at the appropriate time.
However, Venkataswamy and his Telangana cohorts are far from
“satisfied” with such homilies. In fact, Venkataswamy has been coming out with
a new demand every day. After threatening to quit the Lok Sabha if the high
command went ahead with the second SRC, he has sought a CWC meeting to discuss the issue.
He now wants the high command to announce the creation of separate Telangana as
a “pre-condition” for retirement from active politics.
Telangana protagonists seem to have misread the signals
emanating from the central leadership. Even while ruling out the appointment of
the second SRC and delinking Telangana issue
from its purview, the Congress high
command has not been forthcoming with a clear-cut commitment for separate state
or a time-table for its formation. But the pro-Telangana leaders take the
reluctance of Gandhi to spell out her stand on the issue
as a “positive sign” that the favours a separate state.
These leaders miss
out on two significant points. The first point is that the party high command
is averse to formation of smaller States at this stage, notwithstanding the
support for Bundelkhand and Harith Pradesh in Uttar Pradesh and Vidarbha in Maharashtra. So far as the demand for trifurcation of UP
is concerned, the Congress is in no
hurry to oblige the BSP supremo, Mayawati, or the Rashtriya Lok Dal leader,
Ajit Singh, owing to the compulsion of prevailing political situation in that State.
Second, from the Congress
viewpoint, Maharashtra and AP are two major States which can make or mar the
party’s fortunes to wrest or retain power at the Centre, since both UP and Bihar have slipped out of hands of the party almost two
decades ago. AP and Maharashtra together have
90 Lok Sabha seats and even if the Congress
gets 45 to 50 seats, this contributes a lot to its kitty.
In the present Lok Sabha, the Congress
has 43 members, besides 10 NCP MPs and an RPI (A) member as its allies, from
these two states. This excludes seven MPs (from Telangana Rashtra Samiti, the
CPI and the CPI-M, who had won in alliance with Congress
in 2004 elections.
If Maharashtra and Andhra
Pradesh, too, are bifurcated, this may prove to be politically disastrous for
the Congress. Both the NCP and the
Shiv Sena are opposed to separate Vidarbha, though the BJP and a section of
Congress leaders favour such a state.
In the event of the NCP quitting the alliance and joining hands with the Shiv
Sena, the Congress and the BJP would
find themselves at a disadvantage. Also, bifurcation of AP would reduce the
capacity of the Congress to garner
sizeable number of seats because regional and sub-regional parties may gain
upper hand in the bifurcated portions.
The State Governments and the Congress
leadership believe that smaller States would turn to be happy hunting grounds
for Maoists, as has happened, in the case of Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand. With
Andhra Pradesh in general and Telangana in particular having a four-decade-long
history of Maoist presence, a separate Telangana State, which is openly
supported by Maoists, would turn into a left-wing bastion, because the TRS, if
it comes to power in the new State, lacks the guts to stand up to Maoist
threat.
Aware of the Congress
gameplan on the Telangana issue, the
TRS founder, K. Chandrasekhar Rao, however, hopes that he can revive his
party’s fortunes by capitalizing on the infighting within the Congress and confusion in the ranks of other parties. He
set the deadline of March 6 for the UPA Government to initiate steps for the
formation of ‘Telangana
State’. --- INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|