Economic Highlights
New Delhi, 10 July 2015
West Plays Party Pooper
BRICS NEEDS STRONG NEWS SYSTEM
By Shivaji Sarkar
Prime Minister Modi’s condemnation of the West’s
highhandedness along-with his call to end sanctions against Russia marks
the beginning of global, UN and Breton-Woods institutional reforms. This might lead
to the end of centuries of colonial one-upmanship, if not atrocities round the
world.
Notably, the BRICS seventh Summit coincided with the release of the 2015
MDG (UN millennium development goal) which highlights an abysmal poverty
record. Shockingly, over 1.7 billion people remain without sanitation, 75 per cent
children are under-nourished, 1.4 billion live below $ 2 a day, many at $ 1.25
alongside increase in many other deprivation and gender discrimination. This
speaks of veiled rise of discrimination and strife due to certain religious
intolerance.
Pertinently, many of these issues directly or indirectly
were the base for BRICS discussion. Amidst the summit, International
Monetary Fund (IMF) also announced the slowing down of global economy
(largely western). Questionably, was this routine or deliberate
psychological-war to unnerve and desist the new Five powers? Given that IMF
failed to check currency speculation.
Besides, just before the Summit,
the US started talking to Iran for ending
sanctions and engaging with it closely. Is Washington
taking note of closer inter-action among the emerging economies --- three of
them neighbours --- India, Russia and China?
Importantly, the BRICS Summit has lessons for the West. Plainly,
western hegemony has not helped the rest of the world. Its financial
institutions even the UN mechanism could not bring better world order.
And the ganging up of the West ensured that whatsoever the
condition of their economies, the US dollar, Euro and British pound would
control the exchange mechanism and manipulate rates of currencies. Thus making
poor nations subsidise rich economies as they get paid peanuts for their
products thanks to poor currency rates. Eventually, increasing deprivation in
the developing world.
Indeed, the purpose of BRICS is to change this by pro-actively
promoting mutual trade in their national currencies. This would gradually reduce
the dominance of the dollar. Subconsciously, the inspiration has been taken
from the Greek crisis. Remember, Greece did well till it had its own
currency drachma and slid when it adopted Euro.
True, it would take some time for the local currency trade
(LCT) to succeed as BRICS has to iron out initial hiccups of deciding the
exchange rates. It remains to be seen how this helps the rupee regain its
position as also how it vies with Chinese yuan-renmibi. Today, one yuan is
priced at a little more that Rs 10. As it succeeds, the rupee-trade area is
likely to engulf a large part of central Asia, Russia,
China and at a later stage
south-east Asia.
Undeniably, the domination of the money market by the West
virtually made all other currencies pariahs. With the five diverse economies
deciding to trade in their own currencies is an attempt to end monopolies. It
is an honest, pro-people but difficult move. The West would sharpen its barbs
and BRICS might not find it easy to duck, at least, in the near future.
There is no gainsaying, the new development bank (NDB) Asia Infrastructure & Investment Bank (AIIB) BRICS has
set up will gradually create the arsenal for freeing these economies. Happily,
the NDB has been widely welcomed and is opening up membership. Its first Chairman
KV Kamath asserted that if the board approved it could consider helping even Greece!
The $ 100 billion contingency reserve agreement (CRA) would
provide additional liquidity protection to member countries during balance of
payment problems. Of this, China
contributed $ 41 billion, India,
Russia and Brazil $ 18 billion each and South Africa $
5 billion.
Moreover, what BRICS is doing for an
alternative to Breton-Woods bodies has in many ways been done by Andean nations
in the 1960s with Corporacion Andina de Fomento (CAF) or Development Bank of Latin
America; Chiang Mai Initiative in 2000 by ASEAN nations, China, South Korea and
Japan; BancoSur or Bank of the South by South American countries.
Further, the rising economic strength of BRICS
countries has outpaced increases in their voice at the World Bank and the IMF
and South-South economic cooperation has expanded dramatically in recent years.
Brazil now has more
embassies in Africa than UK
does and China has become Africa’s most important trading partner.
Significantly, the value of South-South trade
now exceeds North-South trade by some $2.2 trillion --- over one-quarter of
global trade. Additionally, low-income countries have also seen unprecedented
growth in “South–South” foreign aid with China,
Brazil, and India becoming
larger donors. Thus, these BRICS institutions are part of the process of
greater economic engagement by and among developing nations.
The concern of the West is reflected in the
way western news agencies are covering the Summit. They have an overtone of diverse
economies from different regions coming together wherein its success is
suspect.
Conveniently, overlooking the capacity to form
NDB, manage common issues like cyber, climate and energy arenas and even ignore
the possibility of BRICS sub-group of India,
Brazil, China and South Africa on climate change playing
a crucial role at the UN Climate Change Conference in December.
What’s more BRICS countries can resolve
bilaterally issues like military intervention, sanctions, terrorism, investment
and UN Security Council changes. There are many other emerging common
interests.
However, what BRICS has ignored so far is to
have its own information order as the West-based system injects bias in news
presentation. It needs to set up a strong news dissemination system beyond their
national agencies as a pool of national agencies invariably does not succeed.
It has to consider setting up a global agency to counter western propaganda for
the success of its new reforms agenda.
Yes, there are problems. Trade between BRICS countries
is less than $ 320 billion while their trade with US and EU is 6.5 times
higher. In many areas, the Five countries compete for a share in the markets,
from clothing to aircraft and military equipment. This apart, there are
cultural diversities.
In sum, despite this the union of BRICS is a
positive move. Whatever doomsayers might say, within BRICS trade between Russia, China
and India
has increased. Clearly, it has potential to emerge as the third largest economy
and change the course of global economy. ---- INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|