Economic Highlights
New Delhi, 20 June 2015
Industry As Employer
LABOUR SHUDDERS ‘REFORM’
By Shivaji Sarkar
Labour in India
is akin to its ‘caste’ system. On the one hand are the pampered government or
semi-government workers and on the other the exploited non-government ones.
Even the so-called organized sector does not match the conditions of the government
workers.
In such a scenario of high and low caste workers, the
utterance of reform has become a dreaded word. The more reform is the higher is
the suffering of the Indian worker. It is not restricted to a sector or two but
every sector. That is the reality. So when someone says that an investor in the
US, or the West or anywhere else
in the developed world wants more labour reforms in India, it rattles the workers.
The million dollar question is: Can India take the giant
leap without caring for the working class? Certainly not. But the employers of
all hues choose to think otherwise. They want pliable workers, who would
subsist on below poverty wages, be prepared to be kicked out at whims and fancies
and at the same time contribute to the growth of the economy! Their wishes are
encapsulated in a Bengali phrase – “bamuner
gai, khaabe kam, doodh debe beshi” – the Brahmin’s cow should have less to
eat but must yield more milk. This has not happened to the Brahmin and it is
not now happening to new employers.
The Indian economy is sliding because its ‘holy cow’, the
workers, is at the receiving end and is being asked to shed more (Do the
workers have anything to shed?). So what do those investors want? How would
they be contributing to the economy?
All they have are complaints against everything – the tax system,
wages, welfare, regulations and simply want a free run to escape all laws. The
Union Carbide phenomenon continues. While FDI is good and welcome, should
someone bringing some pennies be allowed to romp home with all the profits? Is
the country that helps them repatriate enormous profits supposed to remain
deprived?
The Indian labour has suffered through the era of supposed
protection. Workers were sacked by the industry in droves without even giving
them their basic minimum wages and other benefits. The closed or abandoned
mills around Kolkata, Mumbai and Kanpur
are stark testimonies of the sufferings of the organized labour.
The ushering in of information technology and related
activities initially brought glee. Some workers were paid in six figures, while
others too were drawing handsome wages by Indian standards. However, the euphoria
didn’t last long. The IT industry, despite soaring profits, has now squeezed
their high-paid employees forcing most of them out it. The new wage standard
varies from Rs 5,000 to 40,000. Those who put in some years and rose to higher
scales are often put conditions that they have little option but to quit.
The phenomenon is widely prevalent in the private banking
and insurance companies. More employees are outsourced and they are not privy
to any benefits proposed by law or company rules. Take the example of the courier
industry. It doesn’t have a law or regular employment. Those employed work at
the lowest wages of around Rs 5,000 or so with the dagger hanging over their
heads. The real estate is no better. Even otherwise its bubble has burst.
Foreign companies such as Nestle or Pepsi hardly have any
plant that they call their own. Every activity, from manufacturing to
distribution, is outsourced. Indian businesses are given loans to produce their
product at prices fixed by the companies. The foreign companies have no
liability to the workers. As the recent quality issue hit Nestle’s noodles,
many such outlets closed down overnight making the workers helpless and
distraught. (One worker in Uttarakhand has committed suicide). The company has
little to lose. The losses are to their Indian operators and workers.
It is important to make a note of what the International
Labour Organisation (ILO) has stated: that on the policy front though many
achievements have been made, bottlenecks have emerged in the implementation of
policies and delivery programmes. In certain areas, fragmentation and
coordination of initiatives have become a challenge for policy makers.
Its report ‘Decent Country Work Programme 2013-17’ finds
that 92 per cent were employed in informal sectors. It’s concerned over the
rising contract jobs, euphemistically called “outsourcing”. Further, it mentions that half of the workers
are engaged in agriculture and just 11 per cent in manufacturing. There are not
many non-farm jobs in rural areas and also finds that the number of women
workers there has declined while there has been a marginal rise in urban women
employment.
Additionally, it also notes with concern that 27 million
micro, small and medium entrepreneurships (MSME) may have relevance for youth employment
but their competitiveness is limited. While it would advocate employ people in
large numbers, the red herring is “there is no specific provision for labour
laws”. It obliquely even suggests that the laws there are more violated than
observed.
This is where foreign companies take fancy in employing
MSMEs to bypass laws. The ILO notes that while social protection and minimum
wages remain amongst the basic essentials, labour protection is minimal. So is
the case it found in the 166 functional SEZs.
In the case of India’s growing education sector,
it is found that here too the faculty and other staff are not paid as per
provisions of the law. Recently, a faculty member of a well-known private
university had to seek none other than Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s
intervention to get his gratuity following termination of job. Most of the
teachers in universities or secondary and primary schools across the country are
“officially” paid a wage through the banks but they have to refund at least
half of it to their employers in cash. This happens even in the national
capital, Delhi.
Shockingly, prosecution of an employer for violation of law
is rare and time consuming. Worse, a mere eight per cent of workers are employed
in the so-called organized sectors. The plight is indeed horrendous. The
private sector – foreign or indigenous – has paid scant attention to it. Can India grow with
such dismal record on labour scenario? What more reforms the industry or the
business need?
Apparently, there is almost a consensus that lots needs to
be done for labour. In the name of “reform”, the workers are set to be deprived
of the least they have. Modi has to look at the workers with a fresh vision.
The labour laws do not need reforms. Rather these need a new approach to treat
labour with compassion. Plus, the government alone cannot remain a model
employer. The industry too has to chip in. Remember, it takes two to tango.
---INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|