Spotlight
New Delhi, 7 May 2015
Nepal Catastrophe
FUTURE SINGNALS FOR
INDIA
By Dhurjati Mukherjee
The recent earthquake in Nepal,
which had a strong effect in Bihar and UP,
calls for an analysis of our country’s preparedness to deal with such natural disasters.
Though the destruction and nowhere near Nepal’s, where it was calculated to be
7.9 in the Richter scale and causing death to over 7,500 people, on modest
estimates, nonetheless it needs to be pointed out that proper planning to
withstand quakes of a little high intensity are missing in the country.
Experts have long indicated that the entire Himalayan region
is earthquake prone as the Indian tectonic plate, which is part of the
Indo-Eurasian plate, is moving northward at around 5 cm. a year. In fact, an
international team of scientists found that where the Indian plate slips
beneath the Himalayas, 63 km long earthquake rupture on a previously
unrecognized fault in western Nepal
has been identified. The scientists had cautioned recently in the journal,
Nature Geoscience, of “a potential seismic hazard within the interior of the Himalayas” and this may have contributed to the present
quake.
Geophysicists are of the opinion that earthquakes typically
cause a sudden subterranean shift in the positioning of the continental plates,
the relevant one in this instance being the Indian plate. A section
of experts has been anticipating an earthquake within a 600 km stretch of the Central Himalayas between Kangra in Himachal Pradesh and
the Bihar-Nepal border. It is also being anticipated that some of the energy
released presently may actually load some incremental strain in the
Kumain-Garhwal region of the Himalayas.
The National Institute of Disaster Management (NIDM) and the
National Geophysical Research Institute (NGRI) has warned that quakes may hit
the sub-continent’s four seismic zones more regularly due to the movement of
the Indian plate towards the Eurasian plate. It may be mentioned here that
Zone-V, the very severe intensity area, consists of parts of J&K, Himachal
Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Raan of Kutch, parts of north Bihar,
and the Andaman & Nicobar Islands.
As part of the risk-mitigation efforts, the NIDM paper has
put greater emphasis in capacity building. It stated that 27 States and Union Territories
were disaster-prone from phenomena like quakes, floods, river erosion,
landslides and avalanches. Almost 59 per cent of the landmass is prone to
earthquakes of moderate to high intensity. Referring to high risk States, the
NIDM warned that “construction in these cities are predominantly not earthquake
resistant, regulatory mechanisms are weak, thus any quake striking one of these
cities would turn into a major disaster”.
The NIDM warning definitely calls for serious concern as the
preparedness of the country to deal with any major disaster in quite poor.
Records suggest that four major earthquakes have occurred in the Himalayan
region – Shillong in 1897 (8.7 in the Richter scale), Kangra in 1905 (8),
Bihar-Nepal in 1934 (8.3) and Assam-Tibet in 1950 (8.6).
In recorded history, several great earthquakes have taken
place in the Himalayan region, which is seismically one of the most active
intra-continental regions of the world. The high seismic activity in this
region has been attributed to the on-going geo-dynamic process that has built
the Himalayas over the past 40 million years.
Therefore, scientists have predicted that earthquakes of greater intensity
would continue to occur in the Himalayan region in future also.
In the Himalayan region, it is not only earthquakes that are
a matter of concern. The extremely sensitive eco-system of a young mountain
requires careful nurturing and not mindless exploitation of its natural
resources. An example in this context was the Uttarakhand deluge in June 2013
where thousands expired due to various factors, including unrestricted tourism
for which unsustainable infrastructural facilities were built.
Keeping in view the above scenario and also the fact that
building collapse causes over 90 per cent of deaths in the event of an
earthquake, there is need to evolve specific standards of construction.
There is need to reform civil engineering education at the under graduate
level as around 60 per cent of the country falls in regions that are liable to
seismic damage. According to an expert of the Geological Survey of India (GSI),
retrofitting is the logical option and, as such, this has to be included in the
syllabus to make buildings safe.
Apart from this, city planning needs to thorough undergo a
change, specially in the risk prone areas. This could be done at an all-India
level with experts who could also explore collaboration with Japan, which
has lot of technical acumen in this field. The Government needs to
conduct its survey and insist of usage of construction material which is
earthquake resistant.
Earthquakes, as is well known, are as old as the earth
itself and the primaeval inhabitants of this planet suffered no less from the
natural ravages of this natural phenomenon than we do now. Research and
statistical data have shown that about a million earth tremors, heavy and
light, occur annually. While most of these are ignorable, there are about
twenty major earthquakes which really cause great damage to life and property.
As such, it is very much necessary to economically design
any structure capable of resisting earthquakes. For this, a prior knowledge of
the science of seismology and the reaction of the various types of earthquakes
on different types of structures is essential. This aspect has assumed great
importance in India
because most of the river valley projects being undertaken are in the Himalayan
seismic zone. As the prediction of the location and the magnitude of an
earthquake are yet to become a practical reality, it is high time that
something more than statistical inference is drawn about the occurrence of
quakes. The examples of devastation in many countries like China and Japan bear testimony to the fact
that unless a scientific prediction methodology is evolved, the future may
witness worse consequences.
At this juncture, it needs to be reiterated that in India
experts from the National Geophysical Research Institute (NGRI), Roorkee School
of Earthquake Engineering, Indian Institute of Geomagnetism, Geological Survey
of India and, of course, NIDM should form a core group to come forward with
specific recommendations both regarding possibility of future earthquakes and
measures needed to withstand them. More research about plate tectonics of the
Himalayan region and awareness generation in the high risk areas are of vital
necessity at this point of time. The Nepal tragedy has sent warning
signals, which both the Centre and States can ill afford to ignore. ---INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|