Round The World
New
Delhi, 3 February 2015
Nepal’s Constitution
INDIA, WORLD AWAIT OUTCOME
By Ashok B
Sharma
India, with the rest of the world
is watching with eagerness the transition of Nepal to a full-fledged republic
with a Constitution that aims to empower all segments of the society. The small
Himalayan country has already shown the world how to abandon the path of
bullets and opt for ballot and to assimilate insurgents into the mainstream.
However, a new draft Constitution continues to be elusive.
New
Delhi is eager to see Nepali leaders draft the Constitution on
their own. In August last year, Prime Minister Narendra Modi in his address to
the Constituent Assembly appreciated the objective of a federal democratic republic
and Nepal’s
sovereign right to choose its own destiny. He hoped that the framers of the
Constitution would work with the spirit of a rishi (seer) with an insight into not only into the country’s
present condition but also into the future and do justice to all ethnic groups
based on the principle of “Sarvjan Hitay,
Sarvjan Sukha” (everyone’s interest and happiness). Modi had met the
political leadership in Nepal
across the entire spectrum.
Nepal is India’s immediate neighbour and also shares
borders with China.
Therefore, India needs to
deal with a valuable partner like Nepal with extreme caution. Not
that it should remain indifferent, but lend support when the government and the
people of Nepal
seek assistance. However, the young democratic republic is very sensitive to
its sovereignty being encroached upon by interference by foreign powers. With
multiple political parties (about 31) in the fray having different interests
and representing different ethnic groups has made difficult for Constitution
framers to arrive at a consensus as suggested by some world leaders. Besides
some political leaders have their own ambition.
Recall, the second Jan Andolan (people’s movement) resulted
in the overthrow of the monarchy in April 2006. The peace process that begun
led to the coming into force the Interim Constitution early next year in
mid-January to manage the transition from an unitary constitutional monarchy
state to a federal republic.
The elections in April 10, 2008 led
to the formation of the first unicameral Constituent Assembly of 601 members –
240 directly elected by the people, 335 elected through proportional
representation and 26 nominated. It began its work on May 28 2008, but could
not produce a Constitution within a period of four years. Thereafter, the 2013
elections threw up a second Constituent Assembly (CA) of 601 members.
The senior-most member of the House
and a former Prime Minister Surya Bahadur Thapa assumed chairmanship of the CA
on January 20, 2014 and administered the oath of office to 565 lawmakers at the
first meeting of the Assembly on January 21, 2014 were the leaders of the Nepali
Congress, CPN-UML and UCPN (Maoist) pledged to draft a new Constitution within
a year. This self-imposed deadline is now over with producing any tangible
results.
If we are to compare Nepal with Afghanistan in the South Asian
region, the latter, being a war-ravaged country, had suffered a lot to come out
of the dreaded Taliban regime and draft a Constitution within a span of barely
two years. As per stipulations of the Bonn Agreement the Afghan Constitution
Commission was set up in October 5, 2002 that suggested that a new Afghan Constitution
be adopted by a Loya jirga (Grand Assembly). The loya jirga was required to
convene within 18 months of the establishment of Afghan Transitional
Administration, which was established by the Emergency loya jirga in June 2002.
After some delay, the proposed Afghan Constitution was presented to President
Hamid Karzai on November 3, 2003. A loya jirga began December 14, 2003 (four
days after schedule) in Kabul
and was endorsed January 4, 2004.
Afghan Constitution was drafted when
foreign troops were present in that country. But this is not the case with Nepal – there
is no presence of any foreign troops, the country is sovereign. The Nepali
leaders on their own came to negotiate peace and the people gave up “bullets”
for “ballot”. But if we compare the situation in Afghanistan,
even after the drawdown of NATO forces, there is still presence of Taliban
insurgency in Afghanistan
and the government is trying to negotiate peace. Certain ethnic groups like
Uzbeks, Turkmens and Baluch resented that the Constitution did not reflect
their culture and interests.
Nepal has the experience of
drafting Constitution in 1959, 1962 and 1990 – all these under Monarchy. In
1990, the first Jan Andolan had
brought multi-party democracy back to Nepal, but it was short lived.
After the overthrow of the monarchy in April 2006, the experiment for drafting
a new Constitution for the republic is in process. The Interim Constitution in
place to facilitate transition from a unitary constitutional monarch state to a
federal republic has also undergone some amendments.
Though the political leadership have
agreed to the concept of federal democratic republic, the debate over the form
of federalism and creation of different States has become a contentious issue.
Two competing proposals are on the table – one is territorial and
administrative federalism and the other is identity-based federalism. In the
proposal for territorial and administrative federalism, creation of seven
provinces have been proposed, namely Far West, Lumbini, Karnali, Gandaki,
Bagmati, Janakpur and Koshi. The critics of this proposal say that high castes
will dominate over the under privileged. The advocates of the other competing
proposal for creation of 10 identity-based provinces say that it would do
justice to several ethnic groups.
Other issues where leaders are
failing to reach a consensus are on the details of the form of governance,
electoral system independence of judiciary, system of direct and proportional
representation. The Madhesis issue has also become a contentious issue. Due
closeness in culture with some neighbouring States in India, many
mistake them to be pro-Indian even though they have been Nepali citizens over
several generations.
The composition of the second
Constituent Assembly is different from the first one. The Communist Party of
Nepal (Marxist) of Pushpa Kamal Dahal (Prachanda) which was dominant party in
the first Constituent Assembly with 229 seats has been reduced to only 80 seats
in the second Constituent Assembly, where Nepali Congress of Prime Minister
Sushil Koirala has 196 seats followed by United Communist Party of Nepal
(Maoist) with 80 seats.
Nepal has a large network of
fragmented civil society groups that are exerting pressure along with the
demands of as many 31 political parties in the Constituent Assembly. There are
also about 100 registered parties who failed to get their candidates elected. The
second though has drawn upon some political leadership to get the Constitution
drafted and approved through a majority vote if the path of a consensus fails.
One can hope that Nepal drafts a
vibrant Constitution enough to do justice to the cross section of its cultural
and ethnic diversity. A vibrant Nepal
will not only be in the interest of India,
but also South Asia. ---INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|