Economic
Highlights
New Delhi, 5 December 2014
Green Tribunal
IDEAS ANTI-PEOPLE, UTOPIAN
By Shivaji Sarkar
The National Green Tribunal is
either too wise or works at the behest of vested interests. Its ideas are
utopian and if implemented would lead to unnecessary policing of those who do
not need it. Else how do you explain its recommendation, lapped up by the
bureaucracy, to weed out all 15-year-old vehicles? The common man loses and
apparently the automobile industry gains along with the corrupt implementing
agencies.
It is a bad economic decision. It
would lead to loss of billions of rupees that could be used for spurring the
economy. Another billion would be lost chasing the wild goose. And what would
be the cost of dumping the “waste” vehicles? How much dumping space it would
require and who would bear that cost? The European Union generates about nine
million tonnes of waste annually from its end-of-life-vehicles (ELV). In India, each
metro would do that.
It is also a myth that a new car is
less pollutant. A 2004 analysis of Toyota
found that as much as 28 per cent of the carbon dioxide emissions generated
during the life-cycle of a gasoline-powered vehicle can occur during its
manufacture and its transportation to the dealer. Even the new hybrids are
found to have a much larger environmental impact during their manufacture
compared to non-hybrids.
Similarly, yet another decision,
thankfully not implemented yet, tends to deny fuel to those who do not have the
pollution-control certificates. It forgets that new Euro III and IV vehicles
even after use of five years have little complaints of exceeding the set norms.
Who is the panel trying to fool or is it yet another instance of working at
vested interests who could earn handsomely by selling petrol in the “black” to
the users? The pollution check for private vehicles should be done only once in
two years and not every three months.
The decisions simply cannot be
implemented without considering the pros and cons. For example, the Uttar Pradesh
Government has found it difficult to implement its decision to deny petrol to
the non-helmet wearing riders in November, 2014. It led to several brawls and
violent incidents.
Similar decision to construct revolting
12 to 15-foot tall irons grills on big and small bridges to stop pollution from
immersion of floral puja (prayer) materials
has not made the rivers less polluted. The utopian decision has led to thriving
of corruption with the nexus of bridge builders and iron forging industry. It
has done no good but increased cost of projects, avoidable loss to the
exchequer, and created grotesque fences.
It appears the decision was taken
with the obvious aim of boosting the unholy nexus and not to save the rivers.
Does ten tonnes each of Durga or Ganesh puja
materials in Delhi
or Mumbai pollute the channels or is it the millions of tonnes of industrial effluents?
The green panel seemingly has become easy green pastures for the corrupt. It
has unfortunately even tried to mislead the highest court.
The country’s national capital, Delhi has a total of
8382284 vehicles of all sorts registered till January 2014, according to Delhi Transport
Department. There are 80552508 private vehicles and 329776 commercial. Let us assume that about 20 per cent of these
vehicles would be 15-year-old. But who bears the brunt more? It is the private
vehicle owners and not the commercial sector.
The decision would immediately affect
about 16 lakh private vehicles and a mere 60,000 commercial vehicles. In all
subsequent years too, it would have at least half these numbers. So the cost of
policing and harassment of the common man would increase. How much it would
impact the work of the police and other implementing forces has not been
reckoned.
This is only about Delhi as the scheme would be extended all
over the country in phases, the cost on all counts would be phenomenal and not
worth it. Should the country, keen on increasing economic activity, be mired in
a thankless job, endless harassment and waste of its manpower for wild goose chase
instead of fixing the criminals?
It is known that private cars except
in exceptional cases do not add much to pollution. The transport department
confirms this as normally it recertifies almost all the vehicles brought to it
after the 15-year-limit. In this country, usually those who keep their vehicle
in running conditions, as old vehicle maintenance becomes cumbersome and
expensive, spend more to keep these fit.
The decision of the green panel would
also lead to creation of many new agencies, usually unproductive as Ireland has
found, like authorised treatment facility (ATF) for ELVs. It also requires
designated sites all over the country, which faces severe land shortage.
Another body has to be set up to deal with hazardous wastes that come from various
effluents and used parts. Perhaps, a few more. Each would add to governance
cost and add to fiscal deficit for dealing with redundant unproductive ideas.
The Indian car recycling industry
usually takes care of these issues and mostly all these supposed hazardous
“waste” parts are reused. The secondary industry absorbs the cost as well as
adds to the growth of the economy without polluting the environment. The ‘kabaar’ or junk industry, recycles and reuses
all that the West considers “waste”. It reduces the social costs and keeps the Government
free of worries to manage the unmanageable. It is a socially and mutually
beneficial system that subsists the Indian society.
The green tribunal, mostly run by
green horns, does not understand the societal norms. They come out with Western
expensive methods suggested by the large corporate to bolster their profits. Their
decision undeniably would affect a larger social chain.
The decision would also lead to
severe pollution. Recycling is the biggest industry in this country. It has
saved the nation many problems the West faces. Why can’t the green tribunal
come with norms that would allow a fit vehicle to be allowed to be run as long
as its owners can? No one drives a sick vehicle.
If the tribunal insists then it would
certainly lead to severe harassment of the masses without achieving the
tangible – reduction of pollution. Block-headed decisions have not yielded much
anywhere. Mexico City
is the worst example of failure of such norms.
If the green tribunal is indeed honest
it should not come out with such utopian ideas but take effective steps to
check pollution and not harass the people. --- INFA
(Copyright, India
News and Feature Alliance)
|