Round The States
New Delhi, 30 October 2014
Delhi Elections
TO HOLD
OR NOT TO HOLD?
By Insaf
Nagging uncertainty lingers around
the nation’s capital Delhi.
How soon will elections be held and what form of Government it will have in
place, is uppermost on everyone’s mind. Lt Governor Najeeb Jung has been far
too elusive, inviting both the Congress and AAP’s wrath, which have been
demanding dissolution of Assembly and fresh election. They accuse him of
appeasing the BJP Government at the Centre. However, the Supreme Court which
has been dealing with AAP’s petition for early elections appears to be
satisfied that Jung is making positive moves to form the Government by
consulting the parties. But, it cannot go on forever, is its warning. The BJP,
which is the largest party, but devoid of a majority, is keeping stoic silence
whether it would stake claim, if asked. At the same time, unlike its opponents
it’s not clamouring for polls either. Guess, it wants to test waters first and
is sitting pretty till the results of the three byelections in November-end are
out. If it wins all three then its tally will go up to 32, taking it closer to
the magical number of 36. But not yet there as there is no question of either
the AAP or the Congress offering support. However, time is on its side.
February 17 is a long way off for President’s rule to expire. It gives enough
time for the Election Commission to hold polls. Will the others patience run
out by then?
* * * * * *
BJP’s Maharashtra Govt
The political race in Maharashtra is inching closer to a grand finish. The
State has finally got its first BJP Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis, who has
staked claim to form the Government as the single largest party and got two
weeks to prove majority. The doors for a backdoor claim for the top seat by
Union Minister Nitin Gadkari were astutely shut. With that done, the BJP has
now to only firm up its mind whether it wants to take estranged partner Shiv
Sena along with it or not. At its end, the SS too has to decide whether it’s
better to be a junior partner or lead the Opposition. The uncertainty has to do
with the NCP offer to the BJP that it will abstain from voting when it moves a
confidence motion in the Assembly. If it keeps its words, then the BJP needs
only 124 to get a majority in the strength of 247 instead of 288, as NCP has 41
MLAs. That’s easy. While two weeks in hand to clinch matters makes BJP
comfortable, the party has decided to have a small Cabinet for starters, making
room for last minute tie-ups. Hope its celebrations from Wankhede stadium last
the full innings.
* * * * * *
Haryana Nuisance
For Cong
Haryana spell further doom for the
Congress. The first BJP Chief Minister Manohar Lal Khattar’s announcements made
promptly after taking over the reins should give 10 Janpath sleepless nights. Khattar
has decided ‘in principle’ to investigate all land deals made by the previous
Congress Government of Bhupinder Singh Hooda. This includes those involving
Congress President Sonia Gandhi’s son-in-law Robert Vadra controversial land
deals, which have been in the news since General elections. Not only was there
alleged violation of legal provisions for granting ‘change in land use’, but
70,000-odd acres is said to have been acquired from farmers at a pittance and
sold to developers at huge profits. In addition, the Government has warned it
would review all announcements and decisions viz appointments or recruitments
made after May 16 by Hooda. Recall appointments to the State Information
Commission and the Right to Service Commission are mired in controversy.
Apparently, a list of “corrupt babus” is already in place with Khattar. While
he may say his Government will not be vindictive, how soon skeletons tumble out
of the cupboard, is to be watched.
* * * * * *
Nagaland-Assam
Row
The Centre has had to step in with
Nagaland’s SOS to it. The Joint Action Committee for Autonomous State of Karbi
Anglong, hill district of Assam has launched a 1,000-hour bandh on Monday last,
adding to Kohima’s woes. Chief Minister T R Zeliang met Home Minister Rajnath
Singh urging intervention to ensure that road communication is not impacted
with the adjoining hill State. Both Manipur and Nagaland have been facing
numerous problems with frequent bandhs in Assam for issues which the two
States have no connection. The JACAS has been demanding creation of an
autonomous State encompassing the two hill districts on the basis of its proposal
submitted last year and the latest move is to pressurise the Centre to
introduce a Bill in the forthcoming winter session of Parliament. While Singh
gave a patient hearing, he also dealt with the disputed boundary issue between
the two States and asked Assam
Chief Minister Tarun Gogoi and Zeliang to work towards a resolution. Both are
to send suggestions within two weeks. Fingers are being crossed for a solution
in sight.
* * * * * *
Punjab’s
Chandigarh
Is Punjab and New Delhi heading towards opposite
directions, is a question doing the rounds in political circles. The whispers
of a rift between NDA partners Shiromani Akali Dal and the BJP during the
recent Haryana election after the former chose to back the INLD instead of going
with its ally are growing louder. This, after Punjab Chief Minister Parkash
Singh Badal at a recent function in Amritsar
raised the decades-old issue of having Chandigarh
as its exclusive capital and getting its legitimate share of river waters.
Though Punjab built the capital, it is shared
with Haryana and has remained a dispute since 1986. The timing of Badal’s
assertion has caught the attention of the newly-formed first BJP government in
Haryana. Its leaders have posed a counter saying Punjab
should clear issues such as handing over all Hindi-speaking areas to Haryana
and SYL canal water to it first. Will the issue become hot and dent relations,
is worth a watch.
* * * * * *
Kerala
Liquor Ban Stays
The Congress-led UDF Government in
Kerala is ‘happy high’ as its new liquor policy has got the green signal. On
Thursday last, the Kerala High Court upheld the ban on liquor and quashed the
bar owners’ petition which challenged the Government policy on grounds of it
being discriminatory. The policy of the State, which has the highest per capita
consumption of alcohol in the country, allows limited sale of alcohol to
five-star hotels and Government-owned retail stores (Bevcos). The HC, has
however, added four-star hotels. Over a period of time, about 1,418 bars have
since closed down following the administration’s decision not to renew their
licenses. Some 80-odd owners had approached the Supreme Court in August on
grounds that different standards were being applied between them and five-star
hotels and thus status quo be maintained. The apex court obliged and asked the
High Court to decide the matter expeditiously. The bar owners reprieve was
indeed short lived. Can they knock on the Supreme Court’s door again or let the
government achieve its noble goal? --- INFA
(Copyright,
India News & Feature Alliance)
|