Political Diary
New Delhi, 20 September 2014
State Funded
Narcissism
NEO-MAHARAJAS TAKE IT ALL!
By Poonam I Kaushish
The more things change the more they remain the same. Daily
we are treated to some mindless antics, inane tantrums, silly shenanigans et al by our rulers. Of which ‘follow-no-rules’ is a fundamental part, instead they
rule by law. No IDs’, no frisking and
long queues, lal batti gaddis filled
with gun-toting bodyguards jumping red lights to exhibit their ‘power’ might. God
forbid, if anyone questions their misdemeanor, be prepared for open fury. Main khaas aadmi hoon, tum kaun?
While some would dismiss the Orwellian syndrome
I-am-more-equal-than-you nee VIP
culture as fallout of the colonial mindset and feudal intent, all concur this
in-your-face boorishness of our VIPs is omnipresent. Juxtaposed with the Oliver
disorder of always-asking-for-more alongside the high octane decibels of Saada Haq whereby, just about everybody,
who’s anybody abuses power and public resources topped by being protected all
at our expense.
The list of our neo-Maharajas replete with the power
trappings that go with it is impressive: Ministers, MPs, netas, bureaucrats, judges, spiritual leaders, criminal-politicos and
leaders kin. Worse, a threat perception becomes a symbol of
power! Sic.
Last week we were treated to three high jinxes of our VIPs. Foremost
political chameleon RLD Chief and ex-Minister Ajit Singh’s bratishness for
being asked to vacate his 5-acre ministerial plush Lutyens bungalow which he
has occupied for hold your breadth, 37 years. First he petulantly argued that
BJP leaders too had illegally occupied mansions during the UPA rule so why
single him out?
When this fell on deaf ears he wanted the house converted to
a memorial of his father ex Prime Minister Charan Singh which was refused as a 2000
order barred Lutyens bungalows being converted to memorials. Singh then got his Bharatiya Kisan Union goons
to demonstrate against the Government who threatened to cut off Delhi’s power supply if
their leader was not allowed to retain his house.
Why is Singh refusing to vacate? Simply because where can
one get a Burra Sahib lavish
seven-star bungalows with manicured lawns, growing wheat and vegetables,
furniture, air-conditioners, fridges and maintenance to boot, down to a Rs 10
tube-light all for free. So what if it cost the tax payer an extra Rs 60 crore
annually.
Lutyen’s Delhi
is absurdly being treated as a holy cow. Think. Each house could be sold to
wealthy Indians between Rs 200-Rs 350 crores, cut into 1000-2000 sq yards plots
and auctioned to the highest bidder thereby netting the Government thousands of
crores or rented out for Rs 25-50 lakhs monthly. Bad luck, the hoi polloi, packed like sardines live in
tin boxes atop each other.
It doesn’t end just there. Two, 15 Karnataka MLAs went
trapezing in Europe for 18-days even as parts
of the State were flood-hit. A nonchalant Chief Minister Siddaramaiah shrugged
his shoulders by asserting he was not aware of it. Recall, when large parts of
the State were reeling under drought 100 legislators went on a junket to Australia and New Zealand. Following public
outcry, the Government conveniently amended ‘rules’ to allow MLAs
subject-specific tours.
Three, our Right Honourables are demanding that when they
fly, they should be allowed to access the airport through a special entrance,
pushed to the head of the line with priority check-ins, treated to freebie
refreshments in first-class or priority lounges and be assigned an airline
representative to handle all their needs and escort them to the plane. Not only
on Sarkari broke Air India or Indian
Airlines, but private airlines as well. Notwithstanding, they don’t deserve
this extra importance. All at our expense.
Raising a moot point: Haven’t we had enough? Do they
actually deserve this extra importance? Considering, most rulers barely
discharge their responsibilities honestly and honourably. Do our leaders know
the reality of Asli Bharat which they
ad nauseum vow to protect? Do they care a damn? Aren’t symbols of authority
contrary to the basic feature of republicanism enshrined in our Constitution? Whatever
happened to democracy by the people, of the people, for the people?
There can be no argument that leaders deserve special
treatment. However, it’s conveniently forgotten that the handling is reserved
only for offices they hold, not for the individuals per se. The President, Prime Minister, Chief Justice, Cabinet
Ministers, Chief Minister, Speaker etc are protected across the world.
At the same time, a fundamental precept of democratic
governance is equality of all citizens before the law regardless of gender,
age, race, ethnicity, religious or political beliefs and affiliations, caste,
class or economic status. Unlike a colonial, feudal or totalitarian regime, in
a democracy the rule of law applies equally to all citizens. No public servant,
not even the President or Prime Minister, is above the law.
Alas, we seem to live in an India where only VVIPs matter, living life in the slim strip called
‘official’ in a race for privilege. Wherein there is a wide chasm between the aam aadmi and our khaas aadmis. Leading to increasing frustration, disconnect and
contempt for the rulers which results in defiance by people at large.
Not for our neo-Maharajas the fact there's something
demeaning about the idea of VIPs, something inherently undemocratic. As it militates
against the idea of equality, for the simple reason that it makes citizens
inferior to rulers. When red beacons and police protection become status differentiators
and they come at the cost of the dignity of the ordinary citizen, there’s
reason enough to challenge the idea and rip it apart.
Clearly, the don’t-you-know-who-I-am’
VIP term is outdated in a democracy. That over one billion people should be beholden
and subservient to their undaata is
anathema and does not hold. It is ironic that those elected to
serve the people deny the very people they serve access to themselves.
Contrast this with developed democracies where equality
before the law governs the demeanour of public servants. In
America
baring a sitting President all others are frisked. Public officials routinely
drive their own cars, meet people, go to restaurants and mingle with the hoi polloi.
Sweden believes in sticking to the rules
and rejoices in its complete absence of hierarchies. Everyone is treated the
same, from company CEO to its cleaner, except of course, the King.
Name-dropping is considered extremely embarrassing. In New Zealand two years
ago, the Prime Minister’s convoy driver was caught over-speeding, faced the
legal process and was promptly served with regulatory notices.
Plainly, our leaders need to dispense with the jo hukam sarkar culture and dismantle
their privileged fortresses, financial pampering and perks if we have to
survive as a nation. This would force them to experience the pathetic state of
affairs in Mera Bharat Mahan and
understand how democracy is undermined when VVIPs break all rules, usurp flights
and train seats and how unsafe public transport is for women.
As a new generation comes of age our rulers need to remember
a home-truth: Democracy is based on the fundamental premise of equality for
all. Gone are the days when leaders were revered, today they symbolise
everything that plagues India,
warts and all. If they don’t change they will become increasingly irrelevant.
We do not need gestures which total zilch. What gives? ----- INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|