|
Spotlight
New Delhi, 6 August 2014
CSAT Controversy
TEST DEFIES NATURAL
JUSTICE?
By Syed Ali Mujtaba
Will it be
a case of ‘too little, too late’ or will the Government yield totally? Indeed,
the raging controversy
to scrap the Civil Services Aptitude Test (CSAT) preliminary examination for
the UPSC has got both the Government and many Civil Services aspirants unnerved.
The aspirants are anxiously waiting to write the exam on August 24 but are
unsure about its dates and its pattern. At its end, the Government has yielded
to pressure in Parliament and announced that the English content of the CSAT
exam will not be counted, but this has hardly placated those agitating to
revert to pre-2011 pattern. Along with this there is a section of former civil
servants who are arguing that the Government appeasement is unwarranted.
The uncertainty is gnawing. The
scheduled exam is already delayed by two months because the UPSC has changed
the pattern of the Mains examination. Now it has fixed the date of the prelim
exam in August, which normally used to be held in the month of May. At present
it appears that the exams will be held on the fresh date with the cosmetic
changes, but it hardly seems to have solved the main problem.
This is the second successive year
when some students have launched an agitation to scrap the CSAT introduced in
2011. They are buoyed by the regime change in the Centre and like to press hard
their point that CSAT doesn’t confirm to principles of natural justice and
there is an uneven playing field being created through this method of testing.
The grievance to scrap the CSAT
comes from a section of students who are uncomfortable for brain teasers and
are pushed to elimination in the first round itself facing such questions. They
have little choice either to forgo the exam or oppose the CSAT pattern.
Adapting to the changing reality is forcing them to go back to school.
In 2011, the UPSC decided to
introduce CSAT as a separate paper replacing the main subject paper in its
Prelim exam. CSAT seeks to test interpersonal communication, logical reasoning,
decision making, problem solving and English language skills. The paper carries
200 marks and along with General Studies the total marks of the exam are 400. A
candidate has to score 315 plus marks, to qualify the prelim exam.
In the changed pattern, a good score
in the CSAT is essential to qualify the prelim exam. But for those students who
find reasoning difficult to handle it is impossible to clear it. Such students
come from humanities and arts background and may have rural and regional
profile. They are completely uneasy about new pattern testing and argue
that the CSAT favours students of science, management and engineering
background because the science stream students continue to hone their reasoning
and aptitude knowledge after their 10th level well into their degree
stage; the arts and humanities students are totally devoid of such content
after their 10th level.
Such students after graduation who
plan to write the Civil Services exams find it difficult to connect to class Xth
level analytical academic content. They have to travel back almost 6 years into
their studies and brush up their Xth level studies to come to terms with
CSAT.
Notwithstanding the facts, that the
CSAT questions are only of class Xth level, doesn’t put all the candidates on
equal terms. As a matter of fact, many students who have mental block to math
and reasoning have a great escape after 10th when they opt for arts
and humanities.
Now such students who have to take
CSAT may find a bit too strenuous to catch up with the past that they
deliberately chose to give up. They find the core paper at their degree level
much easier to study and be tested than going back to the school level and
honing the lessons of aptitude and reasoning. This is the sum and substance of
the problem.
Prior to 2011, preliminary exam use
to have one optional paper and the common general studies paper. Normally,
candidates scored high marks in the optional paper as they were fresh with it
at the degree level. In the General studies paper they could answer substantial
questions, leaving few aptitude questions to luck. In such a situation, they
could still qualify the prelim exams, even if they were not so comfortable with
the aptitude questions.
The complexion of the preliminary
exam totally changed when the Aptitude Test was made compulsory along with the
General Studies paper in 2011. Many aspirants found it rather tough to handle. While
the science and engendering students readily adapted to the changes, the
students from arts and humanities struggled to adopt the new pattern of
testing. It is these students who want the CSAT to be scrapped and may like to
see reverting to the old pattern.
To argue that the CSAT questions are
of high school level and provides a level playing field to all sections is bit
to hegemonic. It defies the logic of the principle of natural justice.
Broadly in India there are
two formats of competitive exams for government jobs. One is based on testing
reasoning and analytical skills and other test the comprehensive knowledge
through written tests. The UPSC Civil Services examination, the Provincial
Civil Services examination, the Judiciary Examination is all in the format of
essay writing to tests. The bank exams and other Public sector exams are
geared towards general mental ability test pattern.
While there may be some candidates
who may be comfortable with both the GMAT (Graduate Management Admission Test) pattern
and comprehension pattern, there could be some students who may not be
comfortable with the GMAT pattern. As a matter of fact, they may find
comprehension pattern of testing more suitable rather than GMAT pattern.
It is to such students that CSAT
defies the principal of natural justice as it tries to sideline many students
of arts and humanities background. As a matter of fact, they argue that
forcing the CSAT is a mere ploy to eliminate a large section of students in the
first round itself.
Just scrapping English from the CSAT
is not the solution to the problem, which is more fundamental in nature. The Government
appointed committee that is looking into the demands for change should look
into all the details before coming up with recommendations.
If the UPSC sticks to the changed
pattern of CSAT it would be forcing the students to adapt to the new pattern or
simply tell them obliquely not to write this exam. If it does so it should be
infringing upon the domain of natural justice. The UPSC needs to be a fair
arbitrator that offers a level-playing field to all the candidates across the
country.
Rather than reworking on CSAT and
make some cosmetic changes to placate some students, it would be more prudent
if the UPSC reverts to the old pattern of examination. This may create a more
level-playing field and suit the aspirations of the Civil Services aspirants
across the country. All eyes will be on how best and how soon a solution is
found. ---INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature
Alliance)
|
Archives 
