Events & Issues
New
Delhi, 30 June 2014
NGOs & Development
AN AVOIDABLE CONTROVERSY
By Dr.S.Saraswathi
(Former Director, ICSSR, New
Delhi)
Non-Governmental Organizations
(NGOs) in India
are again in the news following the widely publicized leaked report of the Intelligence
Bureau slamming foreign-funded NGOs for blocking development projects. Apparently,
people-centric issues are used by them to create an environment that would
stall projects. Mention is made of donors in Britain,
Netherlands, Germany, and the US. Scrapping of Posco’s Steel
Plant and Vedanta Bauxite Project in Orissa, protests against construction of dams
in Arunachal Pradesh, protracted protests against Kudankulam Nuclear Project
among many others are suspected to be linked with foreign funding agencies for
obvious reasons.
The allegations suggesting collusion
of some NGOs with their donors to provoke people’s protest against development
projects have been heard for quite some time. These are indeed serious and need
to be probed to ascertain the truth. For, crackdown on voluntary groups on mere
suspicion, conjectures, prejudices, and political rivalries by using official
power and machinery will not be advisable. The world over, voluntary sector has
rapidly grown in importance for both development and welfare and has manifested
remarkable abilities to deliver where public sector has lagged behind. The developed
as well as the developing countries are experiencing proliferation of types and
number of NGOs -- also called civil society organizations.
Following adverse reports, the Home
Ministry has clamped down on Greenpeace,
India – an NGO
funded by the international campaign group Greenpeace, which works for protection
of natural environment in over 40 countries. It was in the forefront in the
agitation against coal plants in Madhya Pradesh, genetically modified food,
e-waste, etc. All foreign contributions emanating from Greenpeace International
and Climate Works Foundation, says a report must be kept on hold till
individual clearances are obtained from the concerned ministry for every
foreign contribution.
Like the civil society organizations
of the US and Europe, NGOs are
becoming more visible and active in India. They comprise organizations
of different sizes at various levels promoting varied interests--from street
corner or hamlet level organizations in villages and towns to satellite
connected transnational agencies in mega cities with the common feature that
they are not an arm of the government or a tool of the corporate sector.
Generally accepted definitions of a
NGO mention its characteristics as non-profit voluntary citizens’ group,
task-oriented organizations driven by members having some common interest and
performing a variety of humanitarian services and so on. Thus “citizen concern”
is the central focus, “non-profit making” the cardinal principle, voluntarism
in participation, and variety in interests and operation are the principal characteristics
of NGOs.
There is no reliable data on the
number of such organizations existing in India. In the 1990s, the estimates
ranged between 10,000 and 100,000 and a decade later even put the figure as 3.3
million –unbelievable and obviously arrived at by conceding any group activity
for a common cause as falling within the domain of the voluntary sector.
Indeed, a private organization that pursues activities in common or community interest
to promote common amenities or relieve suffering, and promotes the interests of
the poor and the needy is loosely termed as NGO.
There are over 200,000 registered
NGOs in India
and about 44,000 NGOs are reported to have received permission from the
Government for receiving foreign funds under the Foreign Contribution
(Regulation) Act (FCRA). In 2013 there were Rs.12,000 crore foreign funds for
NGOs and that only 2% of the total number
of NGOs reported it to the Home Ministry. Thousands of NGOs are said to be lax
in filing annual income returns and most funds were diverted to unspecified purposes.
If these were true, it doesn’t augur well for the future of the voluntary
sector.
In the past, the Government had not
been an enemy of voluntary organizations. On the contrary, in the 80s, there
were many rural development NGOs and also an Association of Voluntary Agencies.
These adopted a Code of Ethics which prescribed rules to prevent misuse of
funds and disapproved link between these organizations and political parties.
In the last two decades, the role of
accredited NGOs became significant as the Government found them effective in
monitoring and implementing its policies. A Voluntary Action Cell was created
in the Planning Commission as the nodal agency for Government-NGO interface. The
Department of Family Welfare even devised the Mother NGO Programme under its
Reproductive Health Services to motivate smaller organizations to promote the
concept of small family norm and population control, etc.
The FCRA, 2010 prescribes rules for
prevention of misuse of funds and prohibits voluntary workers from leading
ostentatious life and links between political parties and volunteers.
Commercial and political interests of NGOs are disallowed.
In 2007, Government-voluntary sector
partnership was cemented by the National Policy of the Voluntary Sector, which
enables organizations to legitimately mobilize funds. It covers organizations
engaged in public service, community-based groups, non-governmental development
organizations, charitable organizations, networks of such organizations, and
also professional membership associations. The object is to create an enabling
atmosphere for these organizations to further their effectiveness, safeguard
their autonomy, and promote government-voluntary sector collaboration on
principles of mutual trust.
Alas in about a decade, conditions
have turned topsy-turvy and there is an atmosphere of misunderstanding and
mistrust leading to reversal of policies and a crackdown on these organizations.
NGOs which had achieved a place in development and welfare projects are now
caught in controversies affecting their reputation nay, even their credibility.
As long as the NGOs remain confined
to implementing government programmes, they are encouraged and appreciated. NGOs have better rapport with people
at the grassroots and reach them with ease than government functionaries. Once
an organization crosses this boundary and takes up issues of popular concern
but inconvenient to power holders, trouble starts and the foreign component
comes into question.
NGOs in their enthusiasm to oppose
the establishment on behalf of the people seem to be unaware of a basic point. Issues
like corruption, environmental safety, rehabilitation of project displaced
population, tribal rights, right to information are sensitive national issues
unsuitable for people’s action with foreign funds. Donors – within and abroad -
may have their own commercial interests and are in a position to trap the NGOs.
There is always a danger from
strings attached in accepting donations. In choosing issues, fixing priorities,
and formulating operational strategies, directions from donors take away
voluntarism in people’s movements. The NGOs have to guard against the vested
interests of those who pay the “pipers” ordering the “tunes”.
Certainly, the country has to steer
clear of foreign hands intruding into domestic matters whether it is via NGOs
or public and private sector including political parties and not in fits and
start as reaction to unfavourable developments. Laws and rules must be adhered
to by all and it is the duty of authorities to ensure compliance. They cannot
be enforced selectively or only at chosen times, or as a strategy to eliminate
opposition.
The hue and cry over the present
awakening of the authorities is partly the result of the general apathy in our
country to follow rules, to apply them equally to all, and to take action for
violations immediately. Autonomy of the NGOs must be protected and promoted
within the prescribed regulations. We don’t want a policy of cultivating a
voluntary sector which is voluntary in name but functions as an adjunct or
service provider for the establishment or for global commercial tycoons. The
present controversy is an avoidable one if we cultivate respect for laws and
rules.---INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|