Round The World
New
Delhi, 4 June 2014
N-Command & Control Systems
NEED FOR STRUCTURAL CHANGE
By Prof Arvind
Kumar
(Dept. of Geopolitics & Intl
Relations, Manipal Univ)
The
briefing given by the outgoing National Security Advisor Shiv Shankar Menon and
the Chief of Strategic Forces Command (SFC) Vice Admiral P S Cheema to Prime Minister
Narendra Modi on nuclear command chain has raised debates and discussions among
the members of strategic and academic community on the possible and probable
changes in the nuclear command and control structure in the foreseeable future.
India needed an effective Command and
Control organization over its nuclear weapons because of various international
and regional concerns in the immediate aftermath of the nuclear tests in 1998.
It is high time now to review whether India has been successful in
establishing a robust Command and Control organization. There is no doubt in
saying that New Delhi certainly has been attempting to see how best it can put
a line of order in terms of calling a shot especially when the decision to use
the nuclear weapons will be made during the case of any eventuality. Moreover,
the progress made by India
in acquiring long range delivery system also warrants a proper assessment about
its Command and Control Systems.
By
and large, the word Command and Control system is defined as the exercise of
authority and direction followed by a neatly written structure especially over
the assigned forces in the fulfillment of the mission. Any Command and Control
system dealing with the use of nuclear weapons will have a number of challenges
in terms of seeing that the nuclear weapons are safe and nothing untoward would
be expected. The chain of command as defined in the structure would be adhered
strictly.
Undoubtedly,
it is significant and important to have a Command and Control organization in
place so that the chances of getting the weapon used accidentally or
inadvertently are low and minimal. It must be emphasized here that the Command,
Control, Communication, Computer and Intelligence and Information systems
(C4I2) are always considered vital prerequisites for the survivability and
operability of all the various categories of assets including land, air and
sea-based most popularly called triad. The triad works on the integrated and
coordinated C4I2 assets that synergise and optimalise nuclear operations. It is
very vital and important.
Importantly,
the stable deterrence requires a safe and reliable Command and Control system
that can assure and signal to the rest of the world that an unauthorized launch
at a time of crisis is next to impossible and that retaliation in the event of
a nuclear attack is possible. In this regard, the challenge before New Delhi has been to
complement its ‘No First Use” doctrine by putting a robust retaliatory
capability in place.
For
India,
surviving the first strike of a nuclear adversary is vital and essential to be
able to launch a second strike. If the adversarial first strike is successful
by 50 percent then the quantum of C4I2 assets destroyed would be substantial.
Hence, the protection of C4I2 assets becomes essential and must be given top
priority. This is essential because such probable damage would be difficult for
the defending State to recover from and then retaliate by a decapitating
strike. In the case of any eventuality, the challenge remains especially in the
field of maintaining survivable nuclear forces if a country has a no-first use
doctrine. In addition to this, India
also requires to consider its targeting strategy especially relating to both
counter value and counterforce strategy.
As
was envisaged and debated widely on India’s nuclear doctrine, the
country needed to develop a robust National Command Post (NCP) that should be
survivable so that the chain of command is intact despite the first strike.
There is hardly any information available in the public domain to authenticate
that New Delhi India has built a robust NCP and also whether it would be
survivable and the chain of Command is kept intact during crisis time.
The
decapitating first strike from India’s
nuclear adversary will have all the negative consequences for India’s Command
and Control structure. The pre-emptive strike usually by a nuclear adversary
would target the C4I2 and the vulnerability of all the nuclear installations
and infrastructure becomes quite high. The objective of pre-emptive strike
would be to completely paralyse so that it cannot retaliate.
Hence,
the absorption of first strike by India and then retaliate would be a
challenge if it does not emphasise on the robustness of its C4I2 structure. The
degree of vulnerability will be quite high from all angles if India does not
concentrate on the consequences of such a scenario as it would be disastrous
from the national security point of view.
In
the overall C4I2 equation in India’s
context, the executive authority as well as the personnel dealing with the
delivery system needs to be integrated. It will also be applicable to all the
three legs of the Triad and finally help in maintaining all the safety
procedures especially during the case of any eventuality where inadvertent
launches cannot be ruled out.
To
complement a sound and robust C4I2 system, a reliable and technically sound
surveillance system would be required but India seems to have a lot of gaping
holes in its maintenance. In fact, all the major surveillance technologies with
a focus on high-tech sensors and electronic devices are integral part of C4I2.
Such systems have lot of advantages in detecting missile launches by a
ballistic missile capable and nuclear adversary.
It
was again envisaged and ultimately became a major part of the discourse among
the members of the strategic community whether the C4I2 would help India’s ‘Triad’
(land, Air and Sea-based assets) especially in sequencing its readiness
posture. The responsibility of C4I2 has also been to provide the Triad
sufficient warning for an impending attack. It will be, therefore be important
to highlight that the concept of C4I2 can best be defined in the context of
both offence-defence equation.
The
Indian nuclear doctrine also suggests that the nuclear weapons shall be tightly
controlled and released for use at the highest political level. The authority
to release nuclear weapons for use resides in the Prime Minister or the
designated successor. It also states that for effective employment, the unity
of command and control of nuclear forces including dual capable delivery
systems shall be insured. The Indian defence forces shall be in a position to
execute operations in an NBC environment with minimal degradation. The nuclear
doctrine also announced that space-based and other assets shall be created to
provide early warning, communications, damage/detonation assessment.
One has to analyse these commitments
made by India’s
nuclear doctrine about Command and Control system critically. One can infer
that New Delhi requires
putting a number of technologies in place and then integrating various layers
of Command and Control. India can
afford to have such a suitable system only when it articulates and defines the
deployment and employment strategies of its nuclear forces that would be
applicable both during day to-day situations in a crisis, and also during
actual war. The system basically should be designed to fit the forces it
serves. It will also be based and linked with a variety of factors such as
force size, deployment strategy and launch authority.
There are certainly challenges to
the Command and Control systems in India because of the lack of
articulation of both its employment and deployment doctrine. It is high time that
India
should start assessing its structure and employ all the relevant objects of a
matured nuclear capable country.
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|