Open Forum
New
Delhi, 13 May 2014
Of ‘Hopes’ &
‘Emotions’
FOOLS RUSH WHERE ANGELS
FEAR…
By Chanchal Chauhan
The BJP has already started thanking
the electorate for its massive support to their ‘strong leader’. With exit
polls putting its Government in Delhi,
it’s brimming with confidence saying “we told you so”. This apart, the party has
specially sought to underline the difference in the nature of this General
Election and that of earlier elections.
At a briefing the other day the
party spokesperson emphasised this election was one of ‘hopes’ and not of
‘emotions’. Yes, he was right. Hopes, hopes and nothing but hopes were aroused
at the big rallies by the ‘PM-in-waiting’, Narendra Modi, who stated without
any ambiguity, ‘You gave chance to the Congress for 60 years, give me a chance
for just 60 months.’ He aroused hopes among the masses or his followers that within
this short period he would bring prosperity to each home and hearth.
The ‘hopes’ were stirred pretty much
across States. Modi offered them a better tomorrow with certain slogans even replacing
some deities. People, it appears took the bait of his promise to shower all
wealth and riches on the poor, homeless, unemployed, peasants, workers, Dalits,
OBCs and minorities and that under his governance all sections of Indian people
will prosper and all their ‘hopes’ will be fulfilled.
His speeches remind us the similar
hopes aroused by outgoing PM Mammohan Singh when he, at the behest of the
international finance capital convinced Parliament in 2008 to accept the controversial
nuclear deal with the US
because it would provide electricity to every village and home in India. Those
who opposed the deal were dealt a severe blow in General Election 2009 and
UPA-II captured power once again, and didn’t need the support of the Left
parties, who had vehemently opposed the deal. The reactors purchased on the
basis of that deal may well be now rotting somewhere. Each and every home could
not be electrified. Now the UPA-II is facing the wrath of people, but similar
hopes are aroused by the ‘PM-in-waiting.’
During the earlier elections also
promises were made, hopes were aroused and all those promises were written in
the election manifestoes or ‘common minimum programmes’. But after taking oath
and installation of a new regime, most manifestoes and minimum programmes were
thrown into the dustbin of the Central secretariat. People realised late that
they had been cheated and fooled.
The political parties wedded to the
economic interests of the big corporate houses do this dirty trick sooner than
later. They always treat common people as a bunch of fools, but it is not true.
Indian people, after the experience of the bitter dose of authoritarianism
during the1975 Emergency did not allow one-Party rule at the Centre and often voted
for a coalition so as to checkmate the imposition of any dictatorship on
themselves.
The regional outfits also contribute
to this federal polity and are therefore favoured by the voters of their
respective regions. We see this phenomenon of the ‘hung Parliament’ for this
reason. However, this time around, we may not see a similar scenario as the
ineffectiveness of the UPA-II, unabashed corruption and a badgered economy
evoked a battle cry of a strong Government at the Centre. Keeping known allies
in good humour and high voltage election campaign entailing huge election
expenditure may be the key to achieving this goal.
However, if the exit polls are to be
believed and the attempt of the Right reaction in India succeeds, one may visualise
what is in store for its leader. Modi, is hardly aware, what awaits him. His utterances
at rallies, at times, reminded us what the English bard, Alexander Pope, wrote:
‘Fools rush in where Angels fear to tread.’ He aroused the ‘hopes’ among the
Indian masses in the same manner as Indira Gandhi did after the creation of Bangladesh. She
was treated as ‘Goddess Durga’ and she gave a popular slogan, ‘Gharibi Hatao’. But within a short span
of two years, all those hopes were belied, and she faced the wrath of common man
that led her to impose the hated internal emergency.
The poor were the worst sufferers of
the draconian laws she had framed to suppress the voices of agitating masses. She
was praised for this by Bala Saheb Devras, the then RSS leader. The Ambani
group within no time reaped huge profits from bonus-cut and wage-reduction of
workers and thus got the new status of a monopoly House under that regime. But
the common men were deprived of their democratic rights and civil liberties.
So, the big question is whether
history is going to repeat itself. In case, the ‘strong leader’ wins the race and
what appears to be reach ‘7 Race Course’ in New Delhi, he will first face the
adverse weather conditions approaching Indian subcontinent caused by El Nino effect
and these will evaporate the ‘NaMo’ effect. If the monsoon fails, and it is quite
likely this year as predicted by weather scientists, the economic crisis that
is already creeping into the mass of the world economy will worsen and grip India too.
Then the BJP ‘strong leader’ will
try to fool people by declaring from the ramparts of the Red Fort on the
Independence Day that he got no money to help the poor because the Congress led
UPA government left no money in the government treasury and no grains in the
godowns of the FCI to supply to the poor, so he was helpless and he had no
magic wand.
On this pretext, he is likely to adopt
the same path trodden by earlier regimes--of neo-liberal and corporate-friendly
policies. He would then justify his harsh decisions of selling ‘Navratna’
public sector undertakings, as Arun Shourie did during his tenure in the
earlier NDA regime and will allow the entry of FDI in retail and in other
financial sectors as the decision is being imposed rigorously by the international
finance capital that is ruling now the world economy. And, whosoever becomes
the leader of our democracy will too have to serve those bosses.
They may impose or rather export to India some economists from the US such as
Jagdish Bhagwati and Arvind Panagariya as mentioned in my earlier article. Anyone
can see that during the UPA regimes, the same forces of the international
finance capital exported to our country economists such as Manmohan Singh,
Montek Singh Ahluwalia and Raghuram Rajan to keep hold on the key positions so
as to implement the policies dictated by those alien forces. Some of them may
continue in the new regime too, some may be replaced by those who may continue
to follow the same path with new zeal.
Thus, will the masses realise at some
stage the grimy trick and feel cheated? If this happens, then it could trigger a
wave of agitations, demonstrations and manifold expressions of people’s anger
against the same very leader-- ‘strong’ or ‘weak’. Too early or too pessimistic
to say, but in any case, history shows that the common people will still be at
the receiving end, notwithstanding the hopes. ---INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|