Open Forum
New Delhi, 1 April 2014
Corruption Vs
Secularism
GOOD GOVERNANCE ANY
ONE?
By Dhurjati Mukherjee
The run-up to the General Elections has unfortunately got
mired into both the Congress and the BJP targeting each other on corruption
without realizing that this has hardly been making any impact on the people.
They are not only saturated but believe that both the parties are on the same
plank. The only difference the big two seek out is on the issue of
‘secularism’. BJP’s Prime Ministerial candidate Narendra Modi avoids discussion
on the subject and says that development has to be inclusive. On the other
hand, leading the Congress campaign, its Vice-President Rahul Gandhi underlines
that secularism is the country’s ethos and all sections of society have to be
brought to the mainstream of real development.
But is that all that matters to the common man? The voter is
no fool and is well versed with where the issue is heading—sheer vote bank
politics. However, before pressing the button on the EVM, the voter would
obviously keep in mind, whether his lot has improved in this past decade.
Though there has been much criticism of the Congress-led UPA government,
because of large scale corruption and number of scams being unearthed due to
judicial activism, one cannot deny there has been positive work. The
rights-based approach was initiated by this Government in a unique manner –
right to information from public authorities, right to free education to all
underprivileged children under the age of 14, right to employment and last but
not the least ensuing food security.
At the same time, there can be no denying that lack of good
governance has brought the country to the present state of affairs where people
from all walks of life are aggrieved for its inefficiency. But one also has to
appreciate the good work carried out by the present dispensation during its
five-year rule. The talk of change is very much in the air but realistically
speaking whichever party or group forms the government, it would be extremely
difficult to alter the system where corruption and inefficiency are firmly
entrenched.
According to available statistics, every fourth rural
household benefits from the Mahatma Gandhi NREGA programme initiated by the
Government. One may mention here that well- known academicians, V. M. Dandekar
and N. K. Rath, recommended a works programme to generate employment since
unemployment and underemployment widely prevailed in rural areas. The focus
needed to be changed on a comprehensive and sustainable programme on
agricultural and rural development and the process has already started. It is
heartening to note that this programme has been increased to 150 man days per
annum.
The historic National Food Security Act has been the first
of its kind in the world and such an initiative is imperative for a country
like India
where large sections of the population live in poverty and squalor. This effort
to provide adequate food and nutrition to all Indians would go down in history
as a unique venture. However, the recent finding that of the Independent
Evaluation Office that the Government spends Rs 3.65 to deliver Re 1 of food
while 57 per cent of subsidized foodgrains do not reach the beneficiaries, this
has definitely gone against the Government’s functioning. Better delivery of
public services could have been ensured had the Government insisted on strict
enforcement.
The Direct Assessment Transfer mechanism through Aadhar has
been touted as a game changer when it is fully operational and more bank
branches in the rural areas. This would ensure that the subsidies reach the
intended beneficiaries in time and at their doorsteps. Independent analysts
estimate that this could lead to sample of over one per cent of GDP.
However, it also has to be admitted that during the last
10-year rule of the UPA, business houses have formed a nexus with politicians
and the bureaucracy to generate black money/incomes. The triad has cast a nasty
picture of politics and politicians. The whole blame cannot be put entirely on
the UPA as many of the regional parties too, have a similar if not more of a
nexus with corporate houses. A recent example is that of Subroto Roy and the Sahara group which has all along been protected by the
Samajwadi Party in Uttar Pradesh.
Corruption has become a key issue for the BJP to flog at
this point of time since it results in daily hardships for the aam aadmi, whether it concerns price
rise, favouritism in employment generation, rising electricity charges, dealing
with police and bureaucracy and so on. But whether the new government would be
able to tackle these problems remains a big question as the change requires not
only strict monitoring of rules but a change in mindset of those at the helm of
affairs. Moreover, the nexus between politicians, bureaucracy and corporate
houses has to be broken, which all major political parties presently
enjoy.
While the BJP-led NDA, in its earlier tenure, may have
accomplished building roads and highways and developing infrastructure in
record time, the Congress-led UPA government has not been all that successful.
But the rights-based approach and welfare measures have been positive aspects
of its rule. However, the systemic transformation – so much essential at this
juncture – has not been attempted because of vested interests coming in the
way.
Not just the Congress but the mainstream political parties
lack the will and sincerity to implement governance related issues which, in
turn, calls for strict monitoring of rules and regulations. One may mention in
this context the mining sector, where both the Congress and the BJP have been
accused of corruption in mega illegal mining.
The future programme of Modi, who as per opinion polls now
may just head the next government, is not very much clear. He has been a strong
advocate of industrialization and raising per capita income and Gujarat has done very well in this regard. But it is also
a fact that he has strong links with a couple of corporate houses who have
expanded their business in not a clean manner. Thus it would not be wise to
think that he would be a messiah of change.
The transformation that is needed at this juncture has to be
balanced one with emphasis on rural development and modernization of
agriculture. Just going for large projects by ignoring agriculture, agro-based
industries, specially food processing, small and micro industries would be the
wrong approach. Only then can the problems of food inflation, unemployment and
underemployment and rural-urban migration be tackled effectively.
Just raising per capita income and, turn, GDP growth is an
erroneous concept and cannot lead to true development which is inclusive and
sustainable. The perspective of the new government has to be geared towards
upliftment of the masses and also proper infrastructure development – both
physical and social -- to stimulate the growth process all over the
country. Is this basic perception on the political parties’ agenda?
---INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|