Events & Issues
New Delhi, 27 January 2014
Reducing Tariff
USING ENERGY TO WIN
‘POWER’?
By Nikhil Gajendragadkar
Maharashtra Government’s latest
decision to reduce power tariff is widely seen as a move to win votes in rural
parts of the State and to nullify AAP’s influence. But how long can the Government
bear the burden is the key question. Besides, how many other States will follow
suit is worth a look-out.
As election season is hotting up,
political parties and State governments are expectedly doling out goodies to their
people. The Government of Maharashtra has put forth one such ‘bright’ example.
It has slashed power tariff by 20 per cent. The reduction in rates is across
all consumer groups. Yet all are not happy. You do not need a Nobel laureate to
foretell that the decision will affect the State's already poor financial health.
Maharashtra's decision is described as the 'AAP'
effect, as in seen in some other State’s as well. There is some truth in it.
After assuming power in Delhi,
AAP declared free water to all -albeit in limited quantity-, and reduced
electricity rates by half. Immediately clamor for rate cut started in Maharashtra. Two MPs from Mumbai, Priya Dutt and Sanjay Nirupam,
took to the streets to press their demand. If the Delhi Government can do it,
then why can’t the Maharashtra Government replicate it, was their question.
This agitation created an embarrassing situation for the Congress-NCP Government,
as both MPs belong to Congress party. Nirupam was earlier with the Shiv Sena.
Chief Minister Prithviraj Chavan
constituted a committee headed by Minister for Industries, Narayan Rane. The
committee recommended reduction of tariff by 15 to 20 percent. The Government
accepted and implemented the recommendation. As of now, the decision is restricted
to all parts of the State excluding Mumbai - or rather parts of Mumbai-where
power is supplied by private companies.
Interestingly, Chavan has denied
that the move is a ‘copy’ of AAP. According to him, the Government had
constituted the committee last November after complaints were pouring in from
various user groups against the tariff. In September last, the State
Electricity Company increased various surcharges amounting to 20 per cent
increase in rates. So, in effect, the Government has cancelled or withdrawn
that increase. That means there is no real reduction in power tariff or
electricity rates. This so-called reduction is applicable to those who consume
less power, i.e. up to 300 units per month for domestic use.
Even then, this decision will put
additional burden of roughly Rs.7, 200 Crores per annum, according to the Government's
statement. The shortfall has to be compensated by way of providing subsidy. The
cost is Rs. 706 Crores per month. The Government
will bear Rs. 606 crores and two companies, Maharashtra State Electricity
Transmission Company (MahaTransCo) and Maharashtra State Power Generation Company
(MahaGenCo) will bear Rs. 100 crores. If one calculates these figures, the annual
cost comes to around 8400 crores. Then, the big question is, whether this 'cut'
is for a limited period? That is up to elections in May?
Another interesting point is, the Government
has not involved third and important company, Maharashtra State Electricity
Distribution Company (MSEDCL). The two companies have shown accumulated profit
of Rs. 2200 in the financial year 2012.
MSEDCL's accumulated losses are Rs.4649 crores in the period. Now,
without doubt, this ‘please all' decision will drag these two companies in the red.
How the Government will be able to
provide for subsidy is obviously the big question. Undoubtedly, State of Maharashtra's finance is
in a mess, and that can be an understatement.
Whatever the reasons, either because of draught or slowdown in economy,
revenues are drying up. Every year the Government presents surplus budget, but
by the end of the financial year it turns into a deficit one. This year (13-14)
surplus shown is mere Rs.27 Crores. On the other hand debt is piling up. As per
an estimate the year will close with more than Rs. 2, 70,000 crore of
debts. Major portion of the State's
earning is spent on debt servicing and 'non-Plan' expenditure .In simple terms
it means that Maharashtra is spending more to
run its administrative machinery. Very little money is left for developmental work.
Maharashtra’s electricity woes do not end
there. ’MahaGenCo’s dwindling productivity is a cause of concern. In 2011-12 it
was 54 per cent, last year it came down to roughly 52 per cent. Lesser
productivity means more cost of production, which in turn is recovered from end
users. Private companies are more
efficient as they register 85 to 90 percent productivity. For example,
Reliance’s power plant at Dahanu has established capacity of 500 MW, but they
produce 510 to 515 MW through the year. Adani, Mundhra, Indiabulls, and other
private companies are buying electricity at Rs.2.50 to Rs. 3.25 per unit. On
the contrary the State government is paying MahaGenCo Rs. 6.50 per unit.
Using coal of lesser quality –or
outright bad quality- also adds to the cost of production. According to the CAG
report, during 2005-2010 use of inferior and wet coal has drained the State
exchequer to the tune of Rs.5500 Crores. This is a huge loss. Due to
inefficiency, production cost of two plants (Paras, Parali) went up. So, the total
loss is estimated at Rs. 6,852 Crores.
During 2010-13 irregularities in
purchase and use of coal for power generation became even more serious. Coal
must not have ash content more than 30 per cent, is a rule or standard
criterion. But the State’s power generation units were using coal which has
more than 50 percent ash content. So they were burning tax payer’s money. Apart
from corruption and irregularities, power theft adds to the miseries of the people.
Stealing electricity from poles is rampant in rural and urban areas as well,
not just in the State, but across the country.
The supply cannot match demand,
hence large part of the State – particularly rural area-experiences power cut
for twelve hours during summer. Though this is described as sheer ‘load
shedding’ by the Government, power cut is a regular feature for the people. Even
today the State is facing shortage of power. If a consumer is not getting basic
power supply what then is the use of any ‘relief ‘to him?
This forces one to conclude that
this is mere election gimmick. The State can provide electricity at affordable
rate to common people, if –that is a big if- it weeds out corruption and
malpractices from the power sector. Can the Government do this? Does it have the
political will? Are people being overcharged, etc? In fact, Maharashtra
will provide answers relevant to the entire country. However, these will be
known only after the elections--both Assembly and Lok Sabha. --- INFA
(Copyright, India
News and Feature Alliance)
|