Round The World
New Delhi, 18 December 2013
Diplomatic Row
TIME INDIA TOOK ON
US
By Prof Arvind Kumar
(Dept of Geopolitics &
Intl Relations, Manipal Univ)
The entire world has been watching the unsavoury Indo-US diplomatic row
because the international community, in particular, had great expectations from
the ongoing bonhomie between the two countries. There was a consensus among the
members of world community that the trajectory of Indo-US relations will usher
into fresh strides and may see convergences on almost all the important areas
impacting their relationship. Indeed, it is unfortunate that the recent
humiliation met by India’s
diplomat at New York
has impacted negatively on the ongoing trajectory. This time, the United States’ has crossed all limits and tested
India’s
restraint and patience. New Delhi’s response so
far has not been commensurate with the requirements and it’s high time that India acts tough
and signals its annoyance at the American behavioural patterns.
Undoubtedly, there is no denying the fact that the manner of arrest of India’s Deputy Consul
General in New York Devyani Khobragade has been mainly to downgrade and
humiliate the country of a billion people. It was alleged by the US that Devyani
lied on a visa application for her maid. Even if this was true, the US could and
should have handled it differently. Devyani, a senior diplomat, was handcuffed,
strip-searched, subjected to a DNA swab and was treated like a gangster and
dreaded criminal, as if she was involved in human trafficking. Whether the US’ would be able to initiate similar action to diplomats
from developed countries such as Japan,
Germany and France remains
a crucial question for the debates and analysis.
As is known, the US’
will never afford to even raise some of these issues viz diplomats of the
developed world or for that matter even those from China. The cost of such actions by
the Americans will be too high and shall not be in their interest. The courtesies
extended to the diplomatic community by any nation State have been enshrined
and articulated neatly in the Vienna Convention. As a consular official,
Devyani had to be treated with certain grace even if she was at fault as per
the assessment made by the Department of Justice of the US Government.
Whether the arrest of the diplomat violated Vienna Convention needs to be
analysed dispassionately. It must be emphasized here that the arrest and
treatment meted out to her in the entire episode before the release on bail to
a greater extent has violated Article 41 of the Vienna Convention on Consular
Relations. The Article highlights that consular officials are not liable to
arrest, unless and until, the official has committed or landed up in cases of
severe and grave crime. The Article, however, is silent on the definition of
severe and grave crime and it depends upon respective States to interpret it in
one’s own way.
It must be reiterated here that the Americans may not have made an assessment
on the repercussions of such actions. How the US would have responded in such
cases need to be also analysed? Therefore, India
needs to review all the members of US
diplomatic community both in the US
embassy and Consulates whether any of their staffer has violated local
legislation in India.
New Delhi certainly
requires to calibrate a well-grounded strategy to make its response as per the
Article 41 of the Vienna Convention.
Regrettably, so far India’s
responses have not shown its hard line position. The visit of a Congressional
delegation at this juncture and it not being welcomed by political leaders does
suggest a certain amount of annoyance, but doesn’t reflect India’s
assertiveness. At the same time, New Delhi’s method
of registering its protest by not meeting the US Congress delegation does not
seem to augur well with India’s
emerging power status. In fact, the Home Minister, the NSA and other political
leaders should have met the delegation and voiced their concerns in the
harshest possible manner. Such interactions with the Congressional delegation
would have helped India
in voicing its concerns and this would have certainly been seen positively by
the rest of the world.
It is also unfortunate that so far none of the major powers have come
forward and assured support to India.
This again shows that New Delhi
lacks a clout in the international system. It is like fighting a solo battle. Though
in a way, this is correct at the same time, India
by now should have mobilized a sizeable number of countries in its favour and
could have condemned the US’
action collectively. The role of New Delhi’s
foreign policy becomes paramount in this regard and needs to be proactive,
especially when each of the members of the world community has been eyeing and debating
India’s
rise.
A collective condemnation would certainly have helped India in mounting pressure on the US for an
apology and openly accepting their mistakes. Additionally, the measures taken
by New Delhi so
far do not demonstrate anything practically. New Delhi
has demanded that all American diplomats in India need to turn in their
identity cards for scrutiny. This does not augur well with the type of
treatment the US has given
to India’s
diplomat. India has also
asked that the US
embassy and consulates need to provide the salary structure of all the Indians
working with them as well as the salary structure of the Americans working
outside the embassy and consulates. These responses will not help much in
changing the US’ perception
about India.
Importantly, if India
really wants to be treated well then it requires signaling its assertiveness and
fine tuning its diplomatic maneuvering so that such humiliation does not recur.
New Delhi also
needs to behave more professionally. Where is the need of keeping a maid in Manhattan if the diplomat
is not paid in commensurate with the requirements? Nation States across the
spectrum would be required to follow the Vienna Convention in letter and spirit
and its interpretation needs to be done accordingly. In particular, diplomats
need to understand the analysis part of the Convention threadbare. A group of
experts both from strategic and legal community can help the Government of
India in doing so, which would certainly help New Delhi in evolving an
appropriate response to such arrogant and humiliating action of the US.
Indeed, the Indo-US diplomatic row has the potential of surpassing all proportions.
India’s
maturity will be seen in the context of resolving it in a restricted manner. It
should not escalate and be blown into a complete political row as the other
dimensions of Indo-US relations are equally important. Further, the mushrooming
of Indo-US economic and strategic partnership over the years should not get
impacted because of the diplomatic row. But, at the same time, India has to show its absolute displeasure and
prevail upon the US
in urging corrective measures and subsequent action. Reflection of toughness of
India
would again require a very measured proactive diplomacy. It should not be seen
to be wanting. ---- INFA
(Copyright, India
News and Feature Alliance)
|