Open Forum
New Delhi, 12 November 2013
Rich-Poor Divide
WIDENING DISPARITY UNCHECKED
By Dhurjati Mukherjee
The festival
of democracy is in full swing. Political parties and their candidates are all
out promising the moon to the people in the five State elections. But none has
taken into account or addressed the biggest problem faced by the electorate—the
widening disparity between sections of the populace as also between cities and
rural areas and between organized and unorganized workers. This obviously does
not augur well for a country where balanced and sustained development has been
emphasized over the years. The growing imbalance has a very negative effect
which hampers healthy societal growth and development, in the true sense of the
term.
A recent
global wealth and investment report pointed out that India recorded the second
highest increase in high net worth individuals HNIs – those having investable
assets worth over $1 million – in the world. It went up to 22.2 per cent in
2012 while their wealth grew by 23.4 per cent. As against 84,000 HNIs in 2008
and 125,000 in 2011, the country was home to 153,000 HNIs in 2012. Other
reports were more or less similar as regards India was concerned.
The
Capgemini and RBC Wealth Management 2013 World Wealth Report (WWR) found the
country’s reform measures and monetary easing helped the rich in amassing
wealth which, in turn, boosted equity markets gain 23.9 per cent. Most of the
investments were concentrated in the real estate followed by cash and deposits,
equities and alternate investments.
Importantly,
the World Wealth Report 2013 prepared
by Swiss bank, Credit Suisse, revealed that inequality among people and
countries may be at its zenith. Two-thirds of adults in the world have wealth
below $10,000 which is a mere 3 per cent of global wealth while the 32 million
dollar millionaires – 0.7 per cent of the world’s adults -- own 41 per cent of
all assets.
The bottom
70 per cent of India’s households own only about 20 per cent of the country’s
private wealth, whereas in China it is slightly higher at 29 per cent of such
wealth being held by the bottom 70 per cent. The disparity is widening and
creating spasms in the country, thereby leading to social and economic tensions
between States and also between people of different regions within the
States.
The
concentration of wealth in a few hands is no indicator of a country’s
development or progress in any way. True development means there is a
fundamental uplift of the livelihood conditions of the masses which,
unfortunately, has not taken place in the country in spite of the so-called
progress.
While the
rich have become more and more prosperous, the 2013 Global Hunger Index report,
brought out by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI),
released recently (on October 14) revealed that a quarter of the world’s hungry
or 210 million are in India alone. The three indicators used are: one, the
proportion of people who are undernourished, two, the proportion of children
under five who are underweight and three, the mortality rate of children
younger than five.
However, the
report found there has been some marginal improvement as the country’s hunger
index declined from 24 to 21 between 2003-07 and 2008-12. Similarly, the
proportion of undernourished declined from 21 per cent to 17.5 per cent, the
proportion of underweight children declined from 43.5 per cent to around 40 per
cent and under five mortality from 7.5 per cent to about 6 per cent.
But other
surveys indicated that the nutritional value of food consumed per person is on
the wane, which undoubtedly is a distressing phenomenon. As per the National
Sample Survey Organization (NSSO) data, between 2004-05 and 2009-10, the
calorie intake per person per day dipped from 2047 to 2020 in rural areas and
from 2020 to 1946 in urban areas.
The two
pictures of wealth accumulation and poverty present a shameful disparity of
people amassing money, on the one hand, while a major section languishing in
poverty and squalor, on the other. This trend has been manifest as issues like
agriculture, public health, education and poverty eradication have been given a
short shrift, exposing large sections of the population to disease, debt,
suicide and starvation.
The
politicians of the country have never bothered to analyze why in spite of
innumerable programmes targeting the poor to alleviate poverty, there has been
no perceptible change in the livelihood conditions of the people in general of
the rural areas, specially in the backward districts/areas of the country. The
answer to the ineffective implementation of these programmes remains a mystery
and that State governments are primarily responsible for the pitiable state of
affairs.
The result
of this disparity has been increasing social tensions, communal violence and
spread of hatred and jealousy among the masses. The politicians and also bureaucrats
are not liked by the aam admi, who
feels deprived and cheated in various ways as he/she fails to get justice from
the corrupt system.
In fact,
there has been an “erosion of people’s faith in the Government” and the
confidence in public institutions has declined. For example, while the Planning
Commission has not been able to do anything tangible to ameliorate the
conditions of the poor, it has become unnecessarily embroiled in the poverty
line controversy. The integrity and professionalism of civil servants,
including the police force, are being openly questioned. No doubt the system
favours the rich and the powerful and the voice at the grassroots is rarely
heard.
What then
needs to be done? It is indeed very difficult to come out with any ready
solution but there has to be proper understanding of the situation by the
planners and politicians. Development cannot be measured by the GDP growth rate
but other parameters as well which should include the increase in income
patterns of the poor, their food intake, health of children, water supply and
sanitation coverage in rural areas etc. And to start with, the parameters have
to be applied to say 50 to 80 backward districts of the country.
The approach
to development has to take a new approach. Real social development, as
advocated by Mahatma Gandhi and many other political thinkers and development
strategists, ought to rest on five pillars -- it ought to be indigenous,
self-reliant, need-oriented, environment friendly and open to institutional
change. To achieve this, it is necessary to empower the people and recognize
the third sector, represented by the civil society, as a major emerging sector
on the development scene. This sector should be instrumental in building
public-private cooperation and explore the potential for mobilizing latent
human and physical resources for local developmental projects, initiated and
identified at the grass-root level, with people’s participation.
In recent
times, eminent jurist V. R. Krishna Iyer aptly pointed out: “If our country
cares for Gandhiji, if India lives in villages, if a billion Indians matter
more than 23 billionaires (presently the number stands at over 40 or even
more), a conceptual reversal of vision and values is necessary. I am not
against industrialization as such but wealth multiplication in a few hands
throwing voiceless as worthless commodities”. It needs to be emphasized that
the proletariat must survive and flourish and cannot surrender to the syndrome
of “proprietariat monopoly”.--- INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|