Economic Highlights
New Delhi, 18 October 2013
Agriculture Sector
FINALLY CATCHES CEOs FANCY
By Shivaji Sarkar
Agriculture has finally caught the attention
of the Indian CEO, as a hopeful bailout. The chief executive officers are
predicting growth in the industrial scenario with a good rainfall and higher
farm yield and rural income. They are buoyed by the predictions of the
Commission for Agricultural Costs & Prices (CACP) estimates. It states the
sector will have 5.2-5 .7 per cent growth during the 2013-14 agricultural year
(July-June). In the last financial year, farm sector growth was estimated at
1.9 per cent. In recent years, the fastest growth rate was in 2010-11, which
propelled overall economic growth to 9.3 pr cent.
“Comparing
these likely agri-GDP growth rates in 2013-14 (agricultural year) with the last
year (2012-13 ) performance, it turns out that the agri-GDP growth is likely to
be about three times higher than last year," the CACP study stated. Some
private economists are still betting on the farm sector growing by around 4.5
per cent this fiscal year.
However, the CEOs haven’t yet taken
the line of Mahatma Gandhi, who had seen the country growing with its
agriculture. The CEOs in their latest meeting see the positive trend to the
extent it helps the industry as farmers remain a consumer for them rather than a
productive asset. This is where they share a common perception with Planning Commission
Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and Finance
Minister P Chidambaram. For all of them agriculture sadly remains a marginal
sector.
The CEOs should possibly have a
broader vision gradually to give the farm sector its due. As per official
statistics, over 54 per cent Indians i.e. 70 crore people, depend on agriculture
for their livelihood. Officially, it contributes to only 14 per cent of the GDP
and thus the CEOs have reason to look down upon. Therefore, the Government and
the CEOs are keen on taking steps to reduce the size of agriculture so that
corporate profits soar.
Indeed, this is the fallacy. A
reduced agricultural-base would not add to the prosperity of the country. No
corporate or their conglomerates can ever provide jobs or livelihood to 70
crore people. They don’t have the capacity to replace the individual farm
entrepreneur that the farmer is with their corporate might. They need to accept
the strength of the 70 crore people in this sector. Farmers have an immense capability
to contribute to the GDP growth if they are recognized as entrepreneurs and given
the necessary support.
Importantly, they need inputs at
affordable cost. They don’t want to remain dependent on Government electricity
supply. Neither the corporate nor the Government has come out with a proposal
to make them self-dependent with solar or alternative power supply to be
generated by them at a low cost. Additionally, seeds, fertilizer and other
inputs have become expensive. Subsidies are being reduced and loans are not
easily available. Farm product marketing is a mess. All this forces the hassled
farmer the only option to commit suicide.
This cannot be the growth model for
the country. It has to change. Farmers don’t even get the remunerative prices
for their products. What they get is the minimum support price (MSP) and any increase
here raises a hue and cry from trade and industry and is dubbed as
inflationary.
Therefore, the Government while
announcing the latest Rabi crop MSP had to yield to the concerns of all except
the farmers. It raised wheat MSP by Rs 50 and mustard and red gram by Rs 100,
against double the amount recommended by the Agriculture Prices Commission. In
fact, it is difficult for the Government not to raise the MSP. It is a
political compulsion as the elections are knocking at the doors in four States
and Lok Sabha polls are not too far.
Clearly, the Government hasn’t been
fair to the farmers. While it is keen on setting up the Seventh Pay Commission,
which is not yet due, to placate the 50 lakh Government employees before
elections, it ignores the CACP to increase wheat MSP by Rs 100.
Undeniably, the MSP has become a
mockery in most cases. Except a few, in most other cases, the farmers are forced
to sell their products at prices far less than the MSP. In Bihar,
parts of eastern Uttar Pradesh and other places most farmers sell the best
grade wheat at almost 65 to 75 per cent of the MSP. As the Food Corporation of India has
reduced purchases by over 25 per cent, they are forced to sell it to private
buyers at around Rs 800 a quintal against the so far prevailing Rs 1350 a
quintal.
Worse, the farmer is not compensated
for higher input costs as the Government has almost abolished subsidies on
fertilizer and other inputs. And, while the farmer loses, the consumer doesn’t
gain either. On an average, wheat is sold by the traders at over Rs 22 a kg and
by large corporate at over Rs 25 a kg. There is huge profiteering. Nobody acts.
This is leading farmers to divert to
other crops such as corn, sunflower, floriculture and sometimes cash crops that
get them higher prices. Despite the so far record of over 250 million tonnes of
food grain production, the per capita availability is reducing.
Economic Survey 2009-10, per capita net availability per day of cereals and
pulses has been lower than that observed in the previous four decades. In foodgrains
it was 447 grams in the 1960s and 70s, which successively increased to 459 gm
in the 80s and 478 gm in the 90s but came down to 446 gm during 2000-08 and
stood still lower at 436 gm in 2008. The situation is far more worrisome for pulses:
its per capita net availability per day has gone down from around 60-70 grams
during the 1950s to around 30 gm currently.
The Swaminathan Committee had recommended replacing MSP with MRP – minimum
remunerative price so that farmers got better prices for labour, seed,
fertiliser, water and other input costs. It hasn’t been accepted. The committee
had also indicated that higher prices to farmers were not the reason for higher
food grain and other commodity prices. It had given the recommendations so that
the country’s food production is adequate. If the farmer diverts to crops other
than food grain, it might cause severe supply side problems and inflation in
coming years.
The CEOs and the Planning Commission
need to change their outlook to ensure overall growth of the country. The US has stood
the crisis because of its strong agriculture base and high subsidies. India needs to
learn. ----INFA
(Copyright, India
News and Feature Alliance)
|