Round The States
New Delhi, 21 June 2013
Uttarakhand Devastation
RELIEF MEASURES CRITICAL
By Insaf
Uttarakhand devastation should send warning bells ringing in
States as well as the Centre. The cloudburst and aftermath has once again put a
big question mark on the effectiveness of the disaster management machinery. In
fact, some may say what’s new, given that we are known to act post-disaster
forgetting the idiom that prevention is better than cure. Thus, expectedly, the
State authorities have reportedly been “non-functional” with no programmes in
place, as what the CAG states. Worse, even the Supreme Court had to step in
directing the Government to evenly spread rescue and relief operations in the
flood devastated areas around the char dhams. With the toll in what is being
termed the Himalayan Tsunami would run into ‘thousands’, relief measures for
those having survived it would need to be undertaken on a war footing. While
the Centre has offered Rs 1,000 crore relief and States such as Bihar, Madhya
Pradesh, UP, Orissa, Gujarat and Haryana have
too chipped in with a couple of crores each, the Congress Government would need
to deliver. The ‘national calamity’ has evoked a responsible response from the
people at large. Donations are pouring in. Let these not go waste or into wrong
hands. The State can ill-afford another disaster.
* * * *
Bihar’s Bitter Separation
Bihar has little to cheer
about. The ruling JD (U) may have won the war but not yet the battle. Chief
Minister Nitish Kumar expectedly sailed through the trust vote in the
243-member Assembly on Wednesday last, after breaking away from a 17-year-old
alliance with the BJP-led NDA. However, it has been a bitter separation and
left a bad taste not only on both sides, but political onlookers across the
country. The two parties together had ushered in a welcome change in governance
of the State on various fronts, be it law and order, electrification,
roads—development per se. The Nitish-Sushil Modi team had worked well, despite
coalition glitches. But to now see it trading charges is unpalatable. While the
JD (U) is harping on upholding secular principles, and revelling in taking pot
shots at Gujarat’s Narendra Modi, the BJP is busy releasing Nitish’s speeches
to punch holes in his ‘holier than thou’ stance. Surely, the two must realise
that the people are no fools. Sadly, the drama unfolding is for the big chair
-- kaun banega Pradhan Mantri (who will be PM?). While Nitish may not be able
to put aside his personal ambition, at least he should try that it doesn’t take
away what the State and its people have gained. Good governance should not be a
casualty.
* * * *
TN Big Fight
Tamil Nadu is bracing for the big fight. With Rajya Sabha
biennial elections to be held on June 27, both the AIADMK and DMK are busy
getting their numbers, even if it means forging interesting alliances. There
are six seats and seven candidates. For starters, Chief Minister Jayalalitha
had a pleasant surprise for the CPI, when she dropped one of her candidates to
accommodate sitting member D Raja, who could not have made it on his own.
Though many would see this as a move to make it tougher for rival DMK to get
its one seat, it may well also be the beginning for Jayalalitha to play a role
if and when a Third Front emerges for the bigger battle--2014 elections.
Likewise, a worried DMK got a breather with MMK moving across to its camp to
support M Karunanidhi’s daughter Kanimozhi’s candidature. The DMK chief,
however, is burning the midnight oil to woo the Congress, which as of now is
showing signs of keeping its distance from the 2G-scam tainted party and
preferring to back the DMDK, which has too fielded its candidate. While the
suspense would be over in less than a week, it would be worth a watch how the
new alliances work out for the future.
* * * *
Jharkhand ‘Politricking’
Jharkhand is in the midst of hectic political activity. With
a year-and-a-half still left for the 82-member State Assembly term, JMM and
Congress leaders in Ranchi
are trying to reach an understanding to avoid State elections and do away with
the President’s rule since January 18. The JMM chief Shibhu Soren, who had
pulled the rug from under its alliance partner, the BJP, has been supporting
the UPA II from outside, since the breakaway in the hope that the Congress
would veer around and help JMM come back to power or have it as a coalition
partner. However, the Congress top brass simply gave him the cold shoulder. But
no more. The reported softening could be on two counts: one that the JVM (P),
which was once its alliance partner, is seeking dissolution of the Assembly and
elections. Two, which appears more probable, is that in its calculations for
the Lok Sabha polls, the Congress hopes to gain in the numbers game. It does so
given the background that in the 2004 General elections the JMM-Congress
alliance had won 10 of the 14 Lok Sabha seats, as against two and one
respectively in 2009, when they went their separate ways. Will there be a
re-marriage, political pundits wonder?
* * * *
West
Bengal Histronics
West Bengal may well end up having
enough of its Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee’s histrionics. In her penchant for
outdoing her detractors, the TMC firebrand supremo forgets that people will
take her word only so much and no more. The latest being her visit to Kamduni
village. Angry over the protests against her by the village women, who were
upset over the handling of the rape case of a college girl last week, Mamata
sought to make amends by stating the absurd: There was a Maoist-CPM plot to
kill her during her village visit! The women protestors were their members, she
was being targeted and her security was blocked. Recall that her remarks on Park Street rape case, or getting a
professor arrested for his anti-Mamata cartoons did raise a stink in Kolkata,
putting a question mark of the vote for change amongst the city goers. Now is
it the turn of the rural folk? If only someone could give her a piece of
advice, provided however she is willing to listen.
* * * *
SC Raps Mumbai Police
Mumbai has sadly given foreigners a taste of what many
Indians face -- police brutality. On Wednesday last, the Supreme Court gave a
hard knock to the Mumbai Police observing “the country gets a bad name because
of acts of few officers.” The rap was prompted by three Ugandan nationals,
including a parliamentarian, approaching the apex court after the Mumbai police
impounded their passports and restrained them from leaving the country. The
reason: They had come to the city on April 17 to resolve a business dispute
with a big industrial house, which in turn filed a complaint with the police.
The latter readily obliged and filed an FIR, which the court described as
“baseless.” It directed the police to immediately release the passports and
allow the three to go back to their country. Liberty cannot be restrained by the police
because of a business dispute, was the clear message. Besides, the Ugandan
nationals should have been helped rather than harassed. Hope the message
travels wide and far to other States too. --- INFA
(Copyright, India News and Feature Alliance)
|