Round The States
New Delhi, 30 May 2013
Chhattisgarh Naxals
Bloodbath
BLAME GAME ERUPTS,
WHAT NEXT?
By Insaf
It’s political slugfest time following the dastardly killing
of Congress’s top leaders in Chhattisgarh’s tribal-dominated Darbha region by
Naxalalites on Saturday 25 May. The Party has squarely blamed the BJP’s Raman
Singh State Government for providing lackadaisical security which killed its
State President Nand Kumar Patel, his son and Salwa Judam founder Mahendra Karma among 27 others and critically
injured 30 others including former Madhya Pradesh Chief Minister VC Shukla. The
Congress convoy was enroute to a meeting as part of it Parivartan Rally. The Party has also questioned the shifting of a CRPF
camp from Darbha just seven days prior to the attack as the Intelligence Bureau
had informed the State Government about a likely major offensive in the region.
The BJP hit back by accusing its rival of trying to encash on the situation in
the Assembly elections in November and talked of Congress leaders allegedly
involvement.
Undeniably, this worst-ever Maoist strike is the first time
that the Red brigade has targeted the political class instead of policeman and
local public representatives. Recall, the last major attack was in 2010 when 76
security personnel were murdered in Dantewada. An angry Centre has made plain
its plan to hit back with a vengeance. Towards that end it has deployed many
battalions of para-military forces to flush out the Red brigade. Simultaneously,
the NIA is investigating the assault while the State Government has constituted
a judicial commission to probe it. Sadly, however the Union Cabinet is sending
mixed signals. Two senior Ministers want a continuation of the “soft approach
of talks tempered with development” while not a few feel a hard line followed
in Andhra’s annihilation of the Naxals should be pursued. Either which way,
both the Centre and State have to seize the moment and take the Maoist bull by
the horns. They can no longer be allowed to play ducks and drakes with human
life. What gives?
* * * *
UPA Pats Orissa
Believe it or not Odisha rule by BJD has earned a pat on its
back from the Congress-led UPA Government for its State’s public-private
partnership in the health sector, despite not ranking high in health
indicators. Keeping political differences aside, the Centre asserted that the
State model was worth emulating during a first ever workshop of state health
secretaries on National Urban Health Mission (NUHM). It cited Odisha’s PPP
guidelines for urban slum health projects and for urban health centres in seven
cities drawn up by the NUHM. This comes of the heels of the Union Urban
Development Ministry lauding Gujarat for its
land-use policy. Both Naveen Patnaik and Narendra Modi are rubbing their eyes
in this belief at the Congress accolades.
* * * *
Mamta Bans Rallies
West Bengal’s stormy petrel Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee
has done the unthinkable, banned holding meetings and rallies in Capital
Kolkata’s ‘heart’ on the fallacious grounds of the police lacking
"adequate infrastructure" to control such programmes, and also not
inconvenience citizens. Undeniably, sparking strong protests from her rivals.
Nine out of eleven parties called for a meeting by Kolkata Police Commissioner
have vehemently opposed this decision with the CPM accusing it of strangulating
democracy. It seems maverick Mamata was prompted by two incidents, one the
death of a Student Federation of India activist under controversial
circumstances during its rally held in the Capital recently. Two, the assault
by Socialist Unity Centre of India member’s on the Police last week. It remains
to be seen if Mamata’s decision will hold?
* * * *
Kerala Controversy
Over Modi
Controversy could well be the middle name of Gujarat Chief
Minister Narendra Modi wherein he has once again engineered a storm during a
recent visit to God’s Own Country Kerala. This time via an article ‘What if
Modi visits Shivagiri’ in a local daily by an IAS officer who is also Kerala’s
Veterinary University Vice-Chancellor. This has landed the official
in trouble with the State Government initiating steps to remove him.
Simply because, the official has questioned the protests by Parties
against Modi's visit to Shivagiri Mutt in Varkala. Namely, that if Modi could
not be welcomed, it should also be remembered that the Shivagiri Mutt did not
hold it against Rajiv, Sonia or Prime Ministers for the rioting following
Indira Gandhi’s assassination at New Delhi in 1984. Further, he criticized Congress Vice
President for refusing to visit the Mutt, adding, “Selective boycott of Modi
reveals double standards”. An upset State Congress leadership once again
underscores the dictum ‘more loyal than the King’!
* * * *
Haryana-Delhi Water
Spat
It is now Congress-ruled States of Haryana and Delhi which are
squabbling over water. The former has categorically turned down Delhi’s demand for more
water. In fact Chief Minister Bhupinder Singh Hooda has even opposed referring
the contentious issue on Munak canal, funded by Delhi, to a ministerial group. Haryana which
was supplying water to Wazirabad pond through a canal faced problems as it was
old and there was a lot of leakage. Delhi
thus stepped in and built the new one in the hope of course that it would get
its share of water. However, on Tuesday last Hooda played spoilsport at a
meeting called by the Centre. He has claimed that he is supplying more than the
share of the water agreed for Delhi
and that the latter has to plug the “unauthorised cut” it has made in the Munak
canal. In all this spat, the worst hit are going to be Dwarka residents, who
are facing water shortage. Worse, its drinking water. Given that the two States
are both Congress-ruled, fingers are being crossed that the two arrive at an
amicable settlement. Sooner the better.
* * * *
Fight Sex Crimes?
Ban Mannequins
Trust the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation to come out
with an out of the blue nouvelle idea of fighting sex crime: it wants lingerie
mannequins banned. On the grounds that the display of bikini-clad figurines
outside shops selling seductive nightwear could “pollute minds and wrong acts
by men in today’s generation” leading to rapes in the country. Not only this. It pre-supposes that women
would feel awkward in front of the scantly two-piece clad mannequins. It cites
the provisions of the Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986,
which states “indecent representation of women means the depiction in any
manner of the figure of a women; her form of body or any part thereof in such
way as two have the effect of being indecent or derogatory to, or degenerating
women, or is likely to deprave, corrupt or injure public morals. It remains to
be seen how statues can result in less sex crimes? ---INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|