Events & Issues
New Delhi, 18 March 2013
UPSC
Controversy
NATIONAL
INTEREST CRITICAL
By Syed Ali
Mujtaba
Notwithstanding
the Government putting on hold the March 5th controversial notification of the
Union Public Service Commission under all-round pressure within Parliament, the
latest revision of the pattern of examination leaves ample scope for discussion
and debate among the intelligentsia in the country. The Government would do
well to take these into consideration before holding discussions with the UPSC
officials as assured.
The
new pattern of the UPSC Civil Services examination was first introduced in 2011
with the Civil Services Aptitude Test (CSAT) in the preliminary examination.
Now in 2013, a new pattern is introduced in the Main exam that has triggered a
heated debate in the country particularly by the regional satraps on two major
counts. One revolves around Hindi versus other linguistic groups and two, the
rural-urban divide being encouraged by the UPSC.
The
voices from non-Hindi linguistic group have become shrill, calling the coveted
examination favouring the Hindi medium candidates while discriminating
aspirants from regional languages. There is equally a sharp criticism about the
new pattern of examination alleging that it tries to create an “unhealthy and
unequal competition among rural and urban candidates.”
The UPSC
had in 2011 introduced the CSAT pattern involving reasoning and a mental
ability test requiring speed and accuracy. The questions were printed in both
Hindi and English and were obviously seen as advantageous to the Hindi medium students
because they would grasp and answer the questions in their mother tongue faster
than their counterparts in linguistic group, who would depend only on the English
script.
The
March notification has among others shockingly done away with the language
paper of qualifying nature. Earlier, students had to qualify in English and
regional language paper in the main examination, the marks of which were not
counted but passing these was mandatory. But now, the candidates will no longer
need to qualify in a regional language paper and this is being viewed as
helping the urban English-speaking youth. Apparently, even after qualifying the
Prelims, five to nine per cent candidates flunk in regional language paper
while writing the Mains exam.
This
apart, only if a candidate has done his education in a regional language medium
at the degree level, would he/she be eligible to write the Mains exam in that
language. Worse, a minimum of 25 candidates are required to write for the
same and a candidate cannot choose a regional language as an ‘Optional Paper,’
unless having graduated in a particular regional language or studied it as an
optional subject.
Undoubtedly
the UPSC norms have stirred the hornets’ nest, particularly in Maharashtra,
Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat and Tamil
Nadu. The argument is that many candidates shall be deprived of writing the
exams in a regional language, which they may be comfortable with despite not
having studied in that medium. Further, the minimum quota of 25 candidates
required for a regional language is unfathomable. Why should an aspirant suffer
if others choose to write in English or Hindi? Likewise, why shouldn’t
candidates be allowed to choose language as an ‘optional paper’, even if they
have not studied in it at the graduation level?
Undoubtedly,
the language issue is a sensitive matter given the diversity of the country.
However, there is the other side too. One needs to understand the outlook of
the Central Government services such as the UPSC Civil Services examination
where the two languages formula works ideally--the national language Hindi and
the link language English. With the Civil Services having an all-India
character, it would be really difficult for the UPSC to cater to the demands in
22 regional languages in the 8th Schedule of the Constitution.
Thus,
when it comes to providing a level-playing field for all languages in the
country, it is true that the Hindi medium candidates have a definite edge in
the UPSC Civil Services exams. So for the UPSC to be correct it should print
question papers in all the 22 regional languages and allow these to be answered
accordingly. Setting this option aside on grounds of it being unwieldy may not
solve the problem of regional aspirants.
Likewise,
by scrapping the regional language option in the Main examination is the UPSC
being discriminatory? Not necessarily, because the regional language paper was
only of qualifying nature and its marks were never counted in the main
examination. And, in any case a candidate after qualifying the Civil
Services is posted in different State cadres and has to clear the exam in that
language accordingly. Thus, doing away with the language paper has neither made
a positive nor a negative impact on the Civil Service examination.
On
the other issue of UPSC putting restrictions on writing the Main exam in a
regional language and in choosing a language as an ‘optional paper’, may not
necessarily open the slush gates to urban aspirants, having studied in Hindi or
English medium and give a “big blow” to rural counterparts. Keeping emotions
apart, the new pattern of is not really discriminating the regional language
candidates. They are allowed to write the exam in regional language provided
they have studied in that language medium. However, the 25 candidates’ quota
should be revised as administrative considerations can be no
argument.
At
the same time, the UPSC has sought to create a level-playing field between
rural and urban aspirants by increasing the weightage of the general studies
paper. Seen more realistically it will help bridge the gap between social
sciences students and other streams, with the former by and large representing
the rural youth and the latter, urban.
The
subject specialist mostly in commerce, pure sciences and technical stream may
now find it difficult to cope up the 4 papers of general studies, while the
students with social sciences and humanities background may have an advantage.
This may help the candidates from the rural background who may have been bereft
with technical degrees due to their socio-economic background.
Additionally,
the UPSC has done well by retaining English as a paper in the Mains
examination. Its marks being counted as the link language is essential in all
such all-India services. At the same time it has done no harm to regional
aspirants by scrapping the language paper of qualifying nature, even
though some urban aspirants may find this to be advantageous.
In
the end, the UPSC could consider printing the question papers in all the 22
languages, allowing a candidate to write the main examination in the language
of his/ her choice, withdrawing the quota of 25 candidates and agreeing holding
the personality test in the preferred language of the candidate. There must be
give and take in the larger interest of the country.-- INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|