Open Forum
New Delhi, 23 January 2013
Hold On GAAR
WOOING ELUSIVE INVESTORS
Dr PK Vasudeva
The Government is
pleasantly in a proactive mode, at least on one front—wooing investors. Finance
Minister P Chidambaram’s recent declaration that the nation has buried the
“ghost” of General Anti Avoidance Rules
(GAAR), viewed as a ‘monster’, should be hopefully re-assuring to many investors.
GAAR, which was proposed
by the then Union Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee in the 2012-13 Budget is an
anti-tax avoidance rule, which prevents tax evaders, from routing investments
through tax havens such as Mauritius, Luxemburg and Switzerland. This was long-awaited
and was overdue because tax evaders are increasing by the day. However, as the rules
gave unchecked powers to the taxman to check evasion of taxes by foreign
investors, it led to major apprehensions among them, which upset the
calculations of the Ministry to get investments into the country.
According to the
draft, GAAR would have originally come into effect from 1 April this year. As
per the guidelines, Foreign Institutional Investors (FII) not opting for treaty
benefits and ready to pay taxes would not come under GAAR, but those who did opt
for dual taxation avoidance agreements would come under its purview.
For starters, New Delhi was forced to
defer the rules until April 2013, and now subsequently to April 2016 as foreign
investors had expressed their reservation about the language used in the rules.
They had maintained that the ambiguous language used could lead to the misuse
of the rules and some of the FIIs therefore may take undue advantage by
misinterpreting the language.
The GAAR
provision’s objective is to insist upon the principal of “substance over form,”
meaning the real intention of the parties involved and the purpose of
establishing an arrangement are taken into account for determining the tax
consequences, irrespective of the legal structure of the transaction or
arrangement. This immediately impacts upon Mauritius,
which has been the single largest investor into India for much of the last 15
years.
The reason for
this is the Mauritius-India tax treaty, which allows for tax exemption in
capital gains. As a result, much of the Mauritian investment into India is actually round tripping by Indian
companies setting up a Mauritian entity to avoid capital gain tax (CGT) in India. The GAAR
rules, however, are being interpreted as suggesting that investors into India using the Mauritius
route will now be subject to CGT unless they can demonstrate a “substantial
commercial presence” in Mauritius.
This is
currently under review, with representations being made to the Government from
a variety of major financial investors in India, including Goldman Sachs, JP
Morgan, Morgan Stanley and so on. Clarification will be issued once the Finance
Bill is passed, but for now investors would be wise to note that the Mauritius
route for investing into India may be about to be trimmed down in tax value
terms.
Keeping in view the difficulties in executing
GAAR, Chidambaram had little option but to withhold implementation of GAAR till
April 1, 2016, which is a welcome step in the current economic environment.
However, it would require Parliamentary sanction, considering that GAAR become
law with the passage of the Finance Bill 2012, providing for its enforcement
from April 1, 2014.
It is now for the Government to
convince the Opposition about the need for a two-year deferral and to
incorporate it in the ensuing Union Budget/Finance Bill to be voted upon. The
case for postponement is definitely strong and sensible on two counts.
Firstly, it relates to
administrative preparedness as the Government is not yet prepared to implement
GAAR by April 2014 because of the clarity on GAAR, as the term indicates, is
about tax ‘avoidance’ as opposed to blanket ‘evasion’ that is to be dealt with
an iron hand. Avoidance involves transactions undertaken purely with a view to
derive tax benefits; these are illegal in substance, but not in form.
However, proving that an assessee
has entered into an arrangement lacking any purpose other than obtaining tax
advantage requires revenue officials well versed with the finer aspects of
international taxation rules. Without creating this specialised cadre and
machinery that also inspires confidence among assessees – about the GAAR
provisions not providing latitude for exercise of discretionary powers – there
is more harm to be done by introducing a radically new approach to taxation in
a hurry.
Secondly, timings of GAAR
implementation are not opportunistic. The present macroeconomic context is
certainly not conducive to any measure that unnecessarily spooks foreign
investors. With a current account deficit that crossed $78 billion in 2011-12
and looks set to further widen this fiscal, the country requires huge capital
inflows to bridge the gap and prevent the rupee’s free fall. This concern
simply cannot be brushed aside because the Finance Minister is finding it very
difficult to keep the fiscal deficit within 5.3 per cent of the GDP though desirable
to keep it less then 5 per cent of GDP.
Once the implementation of GAAR gets
deferred as per the Government’s plans, details regarding its response to
various other recommendations of the Parthasarathi Shome Expert Committee
become irrelevant. That includes abolishing tax on gains from transfer of
listed securities and levying a higher securities transaction tax to compensate
for revenue loss; making GAAR applicable only on investments undertaken after
April 1, 2016 and so on.
These are matters for the next
Government to consider. Right now, the issue is only when GAAR gets
implemented. By seeking a two-year deferment, Chidambaram has taken the right
call, but the Opposition has to play ball for its approval. Let us hope and let
hope be not in vain.
Additionally, the same needs to be
done vis-à-vis recent suggestions to
impose an additional surcharge on the ‘super rich’ or taxing dividends in the
hands of investors at rates applicable on ordinary incomes. One cannot doubt
the legitimate equity concerns surrounding these proposals. But addressing these
now is to rock the boat at the wrong time. ---INFA
(Copyright,
India News & Feature Alliance)
|