Economic Highlights
New
Delhi, 16 November 2012
Challenges
For India
US LOGS
‘SWADESHI’, EU DUTY CUT
By Shivaji
Sarkar
The issue of foreign direct investment continues
to haunt the nation. The Opposition, Left to right, from the BJP to CPM, have
started singing similar tunes, if not the same. Coupled with this are some
global changes i.e. re-election of US President Barack Obama and EU’s pressure
to cut import duties from 60 to 10 per cent on automobiles and many items that could
make a dent in the Indian economy.
Additionally, both India
and the Pacific may have to deal with the resurgence of ‘swadeshi’ in the US, as President
Obama has to create new opportunities, as promised. America is keen on strengthening
its manufacturing sector, even in consumer goods, and reducing “unnecessary”
imports.
The debate whether the FDI is required or not is
ongoing. A country flush with almost Rs 9 lakh crore of reserves – Rs 7 lakh
crore in the private corporate and Rs 2 lakh crore in public sector – may have
to think twice before seeking expensive FDI that comes with many tags and high
repatriation costs.
Another coincidence is seen in the large NPA –
bad debt – of banks. According to the latest study of the RBI it has increased
to Rs 1,11,604 crore from Rs 52,807 crore in 2008. The fall in asset quality is
stated to be significant in public sector banks. Bad loans are rising as growth
falls and industrial activity plummets.
The moot question is: Can FDI take the country
out of this difficult situation? Growth projections are being lowered every
day. Euro crisis, US
slowdown, rising oil prices, energy costs and lack of a prescription to turn around
the domestic economy are affecting the GDP. The contraction of wages,
particularly in the private sector, is affecting the purchasing power capacity
of the average worker. Indeed, it is a difficult situation.
Unfortunately, FDI is not generating jobs
despite the fact that American FDI during the past four years has increased by
30 per cent. Conversely Indian investment in the US increased to 40 per cent. About
35 India-based companies created over 60,000 jobs in the US, according
to Confederation of Indian Industry. It is the other way round than the
Americans believe. The CCI study shows that over 80 per cent workers at India-based
companies in the US
are Americans particularly in telecommunication, health care and iron and steel
sectors.
India’s recent decision to
open insurance, retail and aviation sector may bring in American investment but
it is doubtful whether it would create enough jobs. The past experience in some
sectors such as soft drinks, credit cards and similar activities resulted in
creation of low-paid risky jobs. Retail companies are known to be poor
employers even in the US and
it is unlikely that these would create quality jobs in India.
Response to the aviation sector has surprisingly
been less than lukewarm. Even if some companies come into this area it would
not create many jobs. It is well-known that foreign airlines are experts in
operating with the least hiring.
Nor does the insurance sector create viable
jobs. They hire only part-time workers. Perception is that Obama’s comeback may
not help the Indian economy the way New
Delhi perceives. It is possible that with the kind of political
pressure that the Americans have put on India more jobs from Bangalore IT hub
may shift to the US and Europe. The IT companies are ordained to follow the
diktat of the US
President if they want to survive in their global business. Despite the slowdown,
the US may create jobs at
the cost of India
and the latter despite performing better has destined many benefits to the
West.
This apart, the latest move of the EU to lower
custom duty in India for
goods being supplied from Europe may create
problems for many Indian companies. Slashing customs duty on “high-end” wine
and spirits is part of the Broad-based Trade and Investment Agreement (BTIA)
with the European Union, which is bound to make life difficult for many local
players, particularly at a time when liquor barons such as Vijay Mallya have
been forced to sell stakes to global giants.
Mallya sold 53.4 per cent stakes of United
Spirits to Diageo. He is
also exiting Aventis Pharma, the
Rs 1,085-crore company whose major shareholders include Sanofi-Aventis and
Hoechst GmbH. Accordingly, Aventis Pharma has stated that its promoter Hoechst
would raise its stake in the company to 60.37 per cent in the firm by acquiring
Mallya’s holding. Hoechst plans to acquire shares from Kingfisher Finvest,
United Breweries (Holdings), McDowell Holdings and Mallya Private Ltd at Rs
1,750 per share.
On the automobile front, it is feared that if
the import duty on cars is lowered to 10 per cent, several European car manufacturers
would export their cars to the Indian market rather than set up units in the
country. This would increase European business as these could operate without
creating more jobs, even some low-paid.
On the other hand, this might create fresh problems
for the units set up in India
be it Maruti or other car manufacturers. The tariff protection that the
domestic industry has been enjoying will go soon after a deal is signed with the
EU. This is a critical element of the trade pact which is currently being
negotiated. Initially the Government had offered to lower import duty on a
specified number of vehicles. However, now it seems to have agreed to an across
the board reduction along with a cut in customs duty on around 65 auto parts
and machinery.
In return it has got the EU to agree to phase
out import duty on cars by 2020 and allow Indian textiles to enter the member
countries on payment of concessional duty. A deal to export banana, rice and
sugar has too been clinched. But
the EU has not allowed any concession in services, visas and labour movement.
There are also hitches on patent issues, social development and many other
investment conditions that the EU wants to put on India.
Therefore, the intimidating tactics of both the
US and EU are no different. The two don’t want to give any more benefits to the
Indian industry but seek access to the Indian market and bleed it to their own benefit.
However, the US signs a tune of having an Indo-Pacific orientation. It may
recognise that the prosperity of the world depends on ensuring that
Indo-Pacific is a place where commerce and freedom of navigation are not
hampered and believes that this would be the new way to America’s recovery.
Strategically it is keen on reducing dependence
on China. But having learnt from the Chinese experience it is not keen on
depending on the Indo-Pacific the same way. It would plan to have the maximum
benefits and throw crumbs to the economies in the region. India has therefore to
look for a new strategy. ----INFA
(Copyright, India News
and Feature Alliance)
|