Political Diary
New Delhi, 7 July 2012
Open Licence To
Loot
PUBLIC FUNDS, APNA MONEY, MONEY!
By Poonam I Kaushish
Government money is nobody’s money. This maxim was
ruthlessly underscored once again last week. When UP Chief Minister Akhilesh
Yadav in his pompous magnanimity announced that MLAs could buy SUV worth Rs 20
lakhs from their Local Area Development Scheme (LADS) to facilitate better
mobility of their constituencies. Sic. Silly me, why did I think that India’s
youngest Chief Minister all of 38 years old would usher in a new bahaar of governance? Forgetting that in
rajniti, public funds translate in to
Apna money, money!
Why blame Yadav? In the last 19 years since its inception in
1993, the MPLADS followed by MLALAD are synonymous with an open licence to loot
of the aam aadmi’s hard earned money.
So deep is the malaise that Trinamool’s
MP Kabir Suman in a tell-all two years back revealed, “Local leaders who
already control Rs 400 crore of the panchayat
samiti and zilla parishad monies,
want the funds and won’t let me spend Rs 1 crore of the Rs 2 crore I receive
annually on installing 44 deep tube-wells in my constituency.”
Even a ‘sting’ in 2006 whereby seven MPs were caught seeking
bribes for doling out contracts under the MPLADS made not an iota of
difference. India’s dalit messiah Mayawati brazenly directed her MPs in 2003 to part
with a part of the “commissions” they made from their MPLADS for Party coffers.
She said, “Arre bhai sub miljul kar
khao”. Adding, that even the most
honest MP makes Rs 50 lakh annually by sitting at home.
Most scandalously, various CAG reports have pointed out that
funds meant for public good are siphoned off to greedy private pockets. Think.
Utilisation of the fund ranged from 37% to 52% during 2004-2009. In 23 States
works under the scheme had not been inspected, 90% of district magistrates did
not maintain an assets or works register. In 6 States, 12 districts showed
advance released as ‘utilised’ in ‘utilisation certificate’, thus inflating
expenditure figure which peaked during elections. In a sample audit of 106
constituencies, it was found that of a total expenditure of Rs 265 crores
reported by the collectors, Rs 82 crores, (31%) was not incurred at all.
The modus operandi is simple. An MP/MLA in connivance with
the DM ensures a cut out of every scheme recommended by inflating the cost and
taking kickbacks from the contractors. The babu
is happy and he makes the MP happier. A smart duo nets up to a maximum of
Rs 2.5 crore of Rs 5 crore and an honest duo a minimum of Rs 1 crore. Asserted
one, it is a "kind of financial rehabilitation package for the political
cadre." For their “protection”, or for other “services”.
Indeed, if you think this is damning, think again. In Hyderabad, over 50%
corporators have not used laptops given by the Government to keep track of
their wards activities and respond to email grievances of residents, simply
because they do not know how to operate them! Of these, some are gathering dust
or in being used by their children and not a few have sold them off.
In Chandigarh,
residents are outraged by their netagan wasting
money by replacing tiles in good condition with new ones on footpaths. Any
wonder, aam aadmi ko gussa kyoin atta
hai. Demonstrating the urgent need to scrap the MPLADS/MLALADS.
The buck does not stop there. Shockingly, over Rs 30 crore
has been spent by various Ministries during 2009-2011 on print and TV advertisements
on eulogizing Party leaders on their birth and death anniversaries. What to
speak of blowing their own trumpets on completion of 100 days, one year et al
year after year. In Delhi,
Sheila Dikshit’s Government spent Rs 22.5 crores in 2008-09 on advertisement,
just prior to the Assembly polls.
Sadly, there is no agency which can stop public funds from
being wasted. Notwithstanding, expert views expressed by various committees. In 2002, the National Commission to Review the Working of
Constitution (NCWRC) sought “immediate discontinuance of the MPLAD Scheme”,
saying it was “inconsistent with the spirit of the Constitution in many ways”.
In 2005, Sonia’s National Advisory Council (NAC)
said “dispense with it” and give the funds “directly to the panchayats and municipalities”. The
Second Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC) headed by the Union Minister, Veerappa
Moily, said in 2007 “schemes such as MPLADS and MLALADS should be abolished”.
Former Chief Justice of India Justice.
Venkataramiah, called it an “assault on the Constitution”. Said he, “The scheme
not only interferes with the federal scheme but also with the healthy
Constitutional principle of separation of powers. There is no provision in the
Constitution, conferring power on individual MPs for spending public money or
giving directions to any officer, particularly an officer belonging to a State public
service, on any matter.
In fact, India
is the only country where legislators have the powers to dispense money and
favours. In the US,
the State imposes penalties for Government finance officers who mismanage
public funds. Not only are they removed but barred from holding public office
for four years and thereafter until restitution is paid. “When somebody’s got
the cheque-book with taxpayer money in it, they’re armed and dangerous and it’s
important that people have the way to correct the situation ... before another
election comes around”, said a Senator.
Sadly, our leaders act like modern-day feudal maharajas. Whereby they expect the aam janata to prostrate before them.
Thus, in this leech infested environment of the
uundata takes it all, our carpet
baggars refuse to let up. Making it imperative for us to have a code of
conduct and ethics in place to minimize the Executives’ violations of
regulations including unjustified misuse of public funds.
In a country where 70% of the population is poor and which
is run by five-year plans wherein enormous monies are disbursed to various development
schemes, which goes into private hands, the time for citizens to understand
what happens with the taxes they pay, why public transport is so poorly managed
and why the public parks look neglected. Without this awareness, how will
citizens stop the loot?
Pertinently, Vijaywada’s 63 municipal corporations have achieved
the unthinkable. They have taken a formal credit rating, signifying their
interest in creating a public profile and tapping the capital markets for their
funding needs. They share their audited financial statements online and the accounts
are certified internally by the municipal auditors and the CAG whose reports
are submitted to the Assembly.
After all, arbitrary exercise of power, mala fide
discretion, cronyism, nepotism and favouritism are dangerous for the country’s
future democratic credentials.
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh needs to recall his speech
during a Short Duration Discussion in the Rajya Sabha on 10 December 2003, on
charges of diversion of the MPLADS funds. As Opposition Leader, said he:
"If you allow things to go this way, people will lose faith in politicians
and the democratic system of governance. This will be a mockery of our legal
system also." A democracy cannot allow exercise of public funds as private
spending. What says you? ----- INFA
(Copyright, India News and Feature
Alliance)
|