Round
The World
New
Delhi, 3 July 2012
India-Japan-South Korea Dialogue
CHINA’S SOUTH CHINA
SEA FORAYS
By Monish Tourangbam
Research Scholar, School of International Studies (JNU)
India's
'Look East Policy' got a significant boost post the 1st India-Japan-South Korea
trilateral dialogue held recently in New
Delhi. Importantly, China's
rising aggression and prevarication in the Asian Continent particularly in the
South China Sea was a major strategic component of India’s communication with these
countries. As India, Japan and S Korea are not only major Asian
powers but also functioning democracies they share noteworthy convergence on the
sustenance of strategic stability in Asia.
Of late, emergence
of triangular relationships in international politics has been a significant
phenomenon with powers including US making efforts to go beyond bilateral to
forms triangles in view of the changing strategic landscapes. In fact, there is
an India-US-Japan trilateral as well, also to manage the rise of China.
In the present
context, India's relations
with both Japan and S Korea have developed into mature and trusted
partnerships over the years and successfully infused growing confidence, across
many issues, including the crucial nuclear negotiations.
Recall, after the Fukushima disaster and acute domestic concerns in Japan against the use of nuclear energy, there
was a U-turn in New Delhi’s nuclear negotiations
with Tokyo.
Nevertheless, the understanding that Japan
eventually gave to India's
civilian nuclear energy aspirations did manage to take ties to another level resulting
in positive dividends across other issues.
Pertinently, India's nuclear negotiations with S Korea
continue to gather steam and forms a pivotal part of New
Delhi’s growing strategic ties with Seoul. Also, India
and S Korea have decided to boost their cooperation in civilian nuclear energy
and space, including the launch of Korean satellites by India in
separate negotiations.
Significantly, economic content
dominates New Delhi’s
ties with both countries. As a part of its Look
East Policy, India's
trade proportions with South-East Asian and East Asian countries have seen a
major upward trend. Despite Beijing’s
reluctance, New Delhi has managed to substantially increase its role in
various regional organisations like ASEAN, ASEAN regional forum and the East
Asia Summit.
Moreover, the
comprehensive trade partnerships with both Japan
and S Korea have shown positive results, in
terms of “trade enhancement, investments and opportunities for professionals.”
For instance, India’s IT presence in both countries is growing and one only needs
to see Indian markets to recognise the success of Japanese and Korean brands specially in electronics
and automobile sectors.
But unlike
economic ties with China
that are accompanied with concern regarding Beijing’s
strategic behaviour and muscle-flexing in the region, there is no such plague
in India's relations with Japan and S Korea.
The shared strategic vision of a secure and stable Asia
among them gives depth to the relationship. Today, Japan’s
vehement criticism of India's
nuclear energy aspirations by slapping a battery of sanctions post the 1998 Pokhran
tests is history.
Undeniably, there has been a
significant turnaround over the years, especially after the Indo-US nuclear
deal and subsequent waiver for India
at the Nuclear Suppliers’ Group (NSG) which opened a floodgate allowing
erstwhile nuclear critics to negotiate civilian nuclear commerce with India. Japan even decided to
lift its decades-old ban on arms exports. Overtures which have not escaped the
eyes and ears of Chinese strategic circle.
Add to this, China's blatant propagation of exclusive
sovereignty in the South China Sea and its aggressive response to other joint
ventures, including those of India
with other South-East Asian countries like Vietnam has increased strategic
tensions in the area. The Sea’s disputed waters are claimed in whole or in part
by Vietnam, Philippines, Taiwan,
Brunei, Malaysia besides China.
In view of these contesting claims, Beijing’s behaviour has
attracted the ire of other countries, including US which sees a role for itself
in the Asia-Pacific region. Washington’s newly
emphasised re-balancing strategy towards Asia-Pacific adds more dimensions to a
possible strategic face-off in the South China Sea
region.
Further, Beijing’s increasing military modernisation
and its Navy’s deliberate march towards becoming a blue-water navy are a major
source of concern. Besides aggression in its vicinity, Chinese maritime plans in
and around India
are raising concerns among strategic circles.
Indeed, Beijing
which projects itself as a ‘peaceful nation’ intent on a “peaceful rise” is
showing its arrogance of power and influence in the disputed South
China Sea. Yet it has turned a deaf ear to New Delhi’s concerns regarding its
questionable activities and investments in the disputed Pakistan Occupied
Kashmir (PoK).
True, New Delhi has no intention of muddying waters
in the Asian region and neither strategic ambitions of stoking rivalries and
conflicts among countries. But “China”
in the South China Sea does not translate into Beijing’s supreme authority over the maritime
resources of the region. Consequently, this concern is shared by many Capitals
in the region and beyond.
Arguably, managing China’s rise
does not translate to preparing for a hot war, unimaginable in today’s globalised
world, where economic ties go hand-in-hand with strategic rivalries. However,
as economic linkages might not translate into strategic convergences, it is
imperative to take a long-term view and prepare for the worst.
Asserted Sanjay
Singh, Secretary (East) in the Foreign Ministry, “There
is common commitment to maintaining freedom of the seas, combating terrorism
and promoting inclusive economic growth. India,
Japan
and ROK depend heavily on the Sea Lanes of Communications (SLOCs) for their
energy security.”
Raising common concern, he emphasised
that the South China Sea was “witnessing
competing claims” and the “common objective” was “to see that the seas and
oceans become regions of co-operation instead of competition particularly as
our energy security and trade depends on them.”
Undoubtedly, with the launch of the
India-Japan-South Korea dialogue, New
Delhi adds another chapter to its re-energised Look
East Policy extending the frontiers and scale of its partnerships in the
region. But it is more important to see if this dialogue will remain just
another fixture on the diplomatic calendar, or it will add some meat to the
Asian security structure that India
desires to develop with other like-minded partners in the Asian Continent, of
which Japan and South Korea are
primary.
Notably, the
trilateral framework will now be taken forward by the three partnering
institutions which includes India's
premier defence think tank Institute for Defence and Strategic Analyses (IDSA),
Korea National Diplomatic
Academy and Tokyo
Foundation in terms of providing it "with meaning and substance."
Lacing this
triangular framework with strategic substance and justification would be the
work of experts from these institutions. To give more teeth to the whole
endeavour but subtle at the same time would be a major contribution. The
discourse among these three countries should be inclusive and broad-based.
Subsequent dialogues are to be held in Tokyo and
Seoul. -----
INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|