Events & Issues
New
Delhi, 11 June 2012
National Youth Policy
NEEDS LINKAGE WITH OTHERS
By Dr S Saraswathi
(Former Director, ICSSR)
The steady flow of scams, one bigger
than the previous and the bitter struggle between political opponents as also
allies, has sadly made political analysts overlook a tiny but significant news
-- the proposed revision of the National Youth Policy announced by the
Government of India.
Since independence, India has
adopted literally hundreds of national policies, and many of these have been
undergoing periodical revisions in conformity with international resolutions,
if any, and also to suit changing needs, aspirations and perceptions in the
society. All policies of any Government are
ultimately interrelated with one another and with the constitutional rights,
duties, and directives.
A fortnight ago, the Draft National
Youth Policy 2012 was published by the Union Ministry of Youth Affairs and
Sports, which is revision of the earlier policy adopted in 2003. That decade
old policy was also a revision of the first National Youth policy adopted in
1988.
Drafting a policy for an age-group
comprising a population with all the heterogeneous features that can be found
in the total population of this country is certainly no easy task. But, the
framers of the policy have the advantage of experience in working two earlier versions, a
number of youth policies adopted in other countries, and deliberations and
recommendations of international agencies to guide their endeavour.
The concept of youth policy can be
traced to the 1960s and the first was adopted in Finland in 1965. The United Nations
Economic and Social Council adopted a Resolution in 1965 emphasising the role
of youth in national development. The Resolution became significant in the
context of widespread student and youth movements in the United States
and some European countries in the late 1960s.
The concept centred around the
importance of youth in economic and social development as actors and
beneficiaries. The Indian government was
also influenced by this idea, and as the first step, the Ministry of Education
was re-designated as the Ministry of Education and Youth Services in 1969. A separate department for Youth Affairs and
Sports was created only in 1985 under the Ministry of Education and Culture,
which was also reorganized as the Ministry of Human Resource Development. A full-fledged Ministry of Youth Affairs and
Sports was created in 2000.
However, it is quite obvious that
the preoccupation of this ministry will be with sports, which excites everyone
irrespective of age, and non-sports matters of youth will have something like a
secondary status. The Budget allocation within the Ministry reflects this
unmentioned gradation.
While the youth policy is the
concern of this Ministry, youth-concerned programmes are naturally scattered in
a number of ministries and departments. The goal of the policy is to empower
the youth of the nation by bringing holistic development.
Unlike the Youth Policy 2003, the
draft policy of 2012 specifies the target groups of youth which include
students, slum dwellers, migrants, rural and tribal youth, out-of-school youth
and drop-outs, those at risk and in violent conflict, transgender, gays and
lesbians, those suffering from HIV/AIDS and TB, those who suffer from social
stigma, and youth in institutional care, correctional homes and prisons.
Priority groups mentioned are young
women, youth belonging to the socially and economically disadvantaged
communities and groups, and differently-abled persons. The concerns of target
groups and priority groups therein are to be addressed through a subsequent
action plan based on policy interventions which are mentioned in the policy
itself.
The earlier policies as well as the
present draft policy are so comprehensive that it can be safely asserted that the
present state of youth in the country is not a result of policy
deficiency. Our governments do a
brilliant job in framing laws and policies and rules and regulations, but fail
only in drawing up programmes to give wide coverage, and in implementing them
in letter and spirit without political considerations.
As a result, we are forever faced
with some crucial problems such as school drop-out, unemployment, and gender
injustice, no matter how many times we address these problems in policy
statements. What we require is action and commitment and not mere reiteration
of some lofty aims and objectives.
There is a growing consensus in many
countries that youth participation is not only a demonstrated value, but also a
political right. It is recognized in some and demanded in many parts of the
world that young people should be key actors in the social-development
processes.
Partly due to historic factors and
also due to post-independence blunders in fixing priorities, India is still
fighting illiteracy, child marriage, infant mortality, and malnutrition. So, we
have a double task of uplifting those below to the ground level, and at the
same time admitting young people as sufficiently empowered partners in
nation-building.
Reforms come only when we act fast. More
and further steps must be taken without halting the process. The draft policy
mentions a number of interventions and young people must be allowed to bring
their own experiences to develop appropriate interventions and services. It
aims at creating a bond between the young people and the community so as to put
the youth at the centre of country’s growth and development.
An important change introduced in the
draft policy is redefinition of youth as 16-30 age group thus shortening by 8
years the range of 13-35 years recognized as youth in 2003 policy and by 5
years the span of 15-34 years recognized as youth in 1988 policy. This is a much needed as the long span of 22 years
under the old policy could result in a ridiculous situation of bringing at the same time a young mother and her child under youth policy. The
UN definition of youth as 15-24 age-group is not suitable for the late starters
in India.
The policy also recognizes three
categories of youth by age-group with distinct characteristics and needs as 16-
21 (adolescent), 22-25, and 26-30 -- a grouping suggested long ago by some
researchers.
The policy is exhaustive and gives a
holistic approach and emphasizes integration with the mainstream development. The country has a National Policy for
Children (1974), National Charter for Children (2003), National Sports Policy
(2001), National Nutrition Policy (1985), National Policy on Child Labour
(1987), National Population Policy (2000), National Health Policy (2002),
National Policy for Empowerment of Women (2001) – all of which are interrelated
with the Youth Policy.
There are many common and continuing
areas under these policies requiring integrated programmes wherever possible,
and definitely a common approach. The success of the youth policy depends on
the success of all related policies and cannot be achieved in isolation. --- INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|