Economic Highlights
New
Delhi, 30 March 2012
Gold Tax Lead To Smuggling
CUTTING NOSE TO SPITE FACE
By Shivaji Sarkar
The new four
per cent tax on gold import and tax deducted at source (TDS) for purchasing gold
over Rs 2 lakh is likely to lead to higher smuggling and cause more revenue
loss than earnings anticipated.
Importantly, in a regime where tax rates are needed to
be lowered and simplified such steps cause more adverse effects. The almost
fortnight long strike by bullion traders has led to a loss of Rs 12,000 crore
of business --- a supposed loss of Rs
450 crore calculated at four per cent tax levied in the Budget.
In fact, the new tax might have more adverse effects
than visible. The rich are likely to be hit less while the poor and marginalised,
both in cities or villages, are likely to lose more.
In the absence of access to banking and less confidence
in paper currency, large sections of the marginalised population still use gold
as a saving instrument as they are deprived of financial inclusion.
The rich too invest in gold is due to the decision to
tax interest earnings on bank deposits. Notwithstanding, the policy makers argument
that imposition of the tax on gold is because black money is being turned into
gold.
Undeniably, the demand for gold has increased almost
in proportion to the lower savings rate. It might mean savings are being put in
instruments where people could save on extortive demand for taxes.
Indeed, this calls for immediate review of the
decision to tax small interest earnings like Rs 5,000 till last year and Rs
10,000 as proposed in the 2011-12 Budget. It is true the Government is earning
some taxes from interest earnings. But it is also correct that many who were
putting their money in banks have decided to bank on gold. Thus, it is not correct
to term all the money invested in the yellow metal as black.
This calls for reform in the thinking process.
Deposits or savings are put in banks by people after they have paid tax.
Demanding tax on such deposits is a dis-incentive for keeping money in banks or
any other savings instrument.
Undoubtedly, it would be prudent to do away with the
tax on deposits to encourage flow of funds to legal instruments. This would not
only increase the flow of funds but also solve the problem of liquidity the
banking sector is facing presently. The Government would save thousands of
crores that it has now decided to put in re-capitalisation of banks.
Besides, taxing deposit is an imprudent measure. It
only diverts funds to instruments like gold, which is considered a safe
investment option. Freeing the bank deposits would solve many problems,
including a huge amount wasted not only by the Government in calculating such
taxes but also by individuals.
Banks themselves have to spend a huge amount for such
unnecessary accounting and paper work thereby reducing liquidity. As all these
savings would lead to higher earnings by the Government which needs a more
pragmatic approach.
In addition, there should be easing of norms for
opening new savings or other accounts with banks. The banking process should be
open to all. Shutting doors on those who want to put money in banks would only
lead to and encourage illegal transaction methods like ‘hawala’.
Time for the nation to think out-of-the-box to
attract money to legal channels as this would help the economy grow faster. Remember,
stringent restrictions are always counter-productive. It not only leads to
higher expenditure in monitoring but also results in diversion of funds to
other channels and consequent troublesome procedures.
Significantly, the State has to realise that in
ancient times the tax concept started as a voluntary contribution. Whereby, all
civilisations resented demand for high taxes or cumbersome procedures. Also, despite
opting for market economy two decades back, India still has to come out of the
mindset of socialistic controls dating to the pre-liberalisation era.
Pertinently, more the controls the more would be the devious
means of diversion. This does not help a healthy economy.
Furthermore, not so long back, India used to
spend a huge amount to stop gold smuggling. In 1991 when Manmohan Singh became
the Finance Minister, the country moved away from the concept that imports of
consumer and luxury goods was bad. Customs duties on gold were removed leading
to the collapse of gold smuggling and related criminality. This measure itself
saved the Government a huge unnecessary expenditure.
Once again the country is slipping back to old
policies. People forget history but those making policies should not. As gold
is easy to smuggle. There is no gainsaying that by imposing such taxes, funding
for Bollywood movies would be made through smuggled gold from Pakistan or Dubai. This would also have an adverse impact
on the sliding international value of the rupee.
Moreover there is a gender aspect to gold as well.
Women in poor and even rich families still feel marginalised within the family.
They put their small savings into gold or buy gold on loan from the local
jeweller. They repay it in small amounts, whenever they can save money. In the
end, they own a liquid financial asset, which they can sell or use as
collateral or pawn it for taking a loan.
The rural rich families too still put their savings
in gold. Primarily, because they trust banks less. For three reasons, one, the interest
rates are low, second, procedures to avoid even legal tax is cumbersome and lastly,
deposits earn less than the loss one makes in terms of inflation. Whereas, in
gold they feel it would keep pace with inflation.
In addition, gold gets one loans easily without too
much of paper work. But the recent RBI step in raising interest rates on gold
loans would reduce the value of gold from the present 80 per cent to 60. This might
again divert small gold investors from non-banking financial institutions to
the village money lenders.
In the ultimate, the nation has to recognise that
inflation is a problem. It cannot be wished away by increasing interest rates. Think.
In 2010 Turkey
cut interest rates despite high inflation. This not only revived its industry,
earned more revenues for the Government but also prices came down.
Clearly, higher gold imports should not be seen as a
problem. This could be solved through better financial inclusion and a non-repressive
simplified tax system. Whereby, gold would not lose its importance by making
the taxman step in or by making it difficult to obtain a gold loan. Lower
inflation and interest rate might suffice. Else, gold would continue to be
smuggled in. A case of cutting the nose to spite the face! ----INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|