Economic Highlights
New Delhi, 23 March 2012
Big Ticket Reform RGES
PUNCH ECONOMY BADLY
By Shivaji Sarkar
Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee
has quietly ushered in a big ticket reform: Rajiv Gandhi Equity Scheme (RGES)
which allows tax concession up to Rs 50,000 along-with liberalisation and
simplification of the process of initial public offer (IPO). Undoubtedly, the
stock market and corporates are immensely to gain as the scheme would generate
more bad money, if not black, than can expedite growth.
Recall, some years back
investments in mutual funds (MF) were similarly allowed a concession. The net
result was loss to the investors. The companies in pseudo insurance business
linked their policies to MF and now have gobbled up thousands of crores rupees
of small investors. But the rules of regulators like Insurance Regulatory
Development Authority (IRDA) favour the companies more as the profits of these
companies are soaring at the cost of poor common man.
Besides, this has a
relative effect on public sector banks. It is no wonder that actual savings
rates are going downhill. Their deposits utilised for infrastructure and other
developmental investments are dwindling. Pertinently, the Economic Survey noted
this negative savings trend with concern. Presently, this trend is being led by
companies like Aegon Religare whereby even if a worse UTI scam-like scenario is
repeated directly nobody is answerable.
Further, those who
deposit in the RGES for tax relief and “quick gains” at the stock market are
likely to end up big losers. Thus, it is wise to pay the tax component than
invest in schemes like RGES with doubtful returns.
Undeniably, this is not
a new experience for small investors. They have faced this since the 1992 stock
market boom led by Harshad Mehta, by Ketan Parekh in the late 90’s followed by
the UTI scam. In between there had been other less noticed scandals in LIC and
other financial organisations. There is no gainsaying that Indian investors
have yet to recover over Rs 2 lakh crore they lost in these operations. As these
schemes target those with an annual income of less than Rs 10 lakh wherein the
poorer sections of society are at great risk of getting pauperised.
The new proposal for
IPOs is yet another danger to the economy. Mukehrjee said, “I propose to make
it mandatory for companies to issue IPOs of Rs 10 crore and above”. Indeed,
this is a red rag as it again targets small investors. The dangers are immense.
Remember, between 1992-1998 thousands of IPOs of shady companies robbed gullible
investors and the country of several billions rupees. Today, many of these were
fly-by-night operators have vanished without a trail. Not a single paisa has
yet been recovered, worse hardly any of these IPO issuers punished.
Importantly, one wonders
why the Government now wants to officially back such dubious market
instruments. Perhaps, the Government is too obsessed with the capital market notwithstanding,
SEBI even with its best efforts has been unable to chastise them. Given that insider
trade remains a phenomenon that decides equity prices artificially and the net
gain is always of the operator and a loss to the people.
Arguably, isn’t the Government
supposed to protect the public? Instead, it has virtually throws the people to
wolves. Certainly, both sad and surprising that Rajiv Gandhi’s name has been
used for such a scheme. Also, if the Government is fighting against black
money, has it ever assessed how such “legitimate” operations would turn white
money into black?
Interestingly, in this
entire process the banking sector and small investment instruments like the
National Savings Organisation would be worse hit as its money funds the Government’s
developmental programmes. Considering that any Government having a high fiscal
deficit has these instruments to back its operational needs.
Moreover, the RGES would
further rob the Government of easy money. As small savings are already hit, the
Government might find borrowing expensive as it would have to borrow at higher
interest rate. This would create a cycle of further deficit and increase the
cost of governance because debt servicing cost would increase.
Shockingly, the total Government
debts are already touching critical levels of 45.5 per cent, only five points
less than the notified danger mark. Resulting, in alarm bells beginning to
toll. Needless to say, this so called reform would not leave any opportunity to
correct the wrongs being done.
Specially at a time when
the banks are facing a severe liquidity crisis as their funds have got entangled
in several power projects --- almost to the tune of Rs 450,000 crore. As a
result the obsession with the capital market is not only unwarranted but it is
against the economic fundamentals.
Notably, the Government
has to realise that the share market has neither ever been nor would ever be
the barometer of economic health. The recent Occupy Wall Market protesters in
the US
have demanded action against the stock markets. As per their calculations
several trillions of American citizen’s money has been lost in the equity
market. A World Bank assessment puts the figure at $ 13 trillion.
Undeniably, India needs to learn from the the mother of
stock markets experience, the US.
Considering that the 2008 crisis was ushered in by the US stock
markets crash. So was the Great Depression of 1930s.
Plainly, the Government
must withdraw the two equity schemes. This would not only ease the liquidity
crisis but also to give a boost to actual economic activities. Towards that
end, Finance Minister Mukherjee must reorient his budget as he gives his final
touches and replies to the debate in the Lok Sabha. He has to contain the administrative
expenditure and take steps to bring down inflation, which is shooting up once
again.
He needs to lower his
tax rates and by scrapping the equity schemes divert the flow of money to his
own National Savings schemes. It is no prudery to fund the needs of the market,
which can do so on its own, by diverting it from the Government’s own kitty.
In the ultimate, the
people need to have higher purchasing power coupled with industrial and
agricultural growth. Today, the Finance Minister has time to correct his
course. He must do this if he is serious about his growth projections. Bluntly,
the country should not be pawned to some market operators. Mukherjee needs to
keep in mind that political governance is about overall growth and poverty
alleviation. There is still time to revise the steps which should be done post
haste. ---- INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|