Open
Forum
New Delhi, 1 February 2012
Olympics & Bhopal Tragedy
CONG, NOT DOW TO BLAME?
By Proloy Bagchi
The
row over Dow chemical sponsorship of the London Olympics 2012 has, of late,
assumed larger proportions. While the Manmohan Singh Government Centre has asked
the Indian Olympic Association to lodge a protest with the London Organising
Committee for Olympic Games (LOCOG) 2012 for allowing Dow Chemical as a
sponsor, the Vietnam Association for Victims of Agent Orange/Dioxin (VAVA) has
also asked LOCOG on behalf of its 300,000 members and three million victims of
Agent Orange in Vietnam to drop Dow Chemical as a sponsor.
New
Delhi’s protest was based on the linkage of Dow Chemical to the Union Carbide
Corporation from the erstwhile Bhopal factory of which a lethal gas escaped in
December 1984 killing and maiming thousands. The VAVA, however, has protested
for the reason that Dow was one of the companies which supplied toxic chemicals,
collectively called Agent Orange, for use by the US military in the Vietnam War
devastating the country’s ecology and environment, leaving millions dead and
suffering.
The
Dow Chemical Company (TDCC) signed an agreement with the International Olympic
Committee (IOC) in 2010 under which the former was declared its official world-wide
partner and for the Olympic Movement up to 2020. As per the agreement, Dow is
also supposed to partner the National Olympic Committees across the globe. For
the 2012 Games, Dow is footing the bill for a temporary decorative wrap over London's Olympic Stadium.
It, however, removed its logo from the wrap following widespread protests and
demonstrations against its association with the Games.
The
company's sponsorship deal has led to outrage among victims of the Bhopal tragedy. The Bhopal Gas Peedit Mahila Stationery Karmchari Sangh's Rashida Bi said
her organisation had requested the Prime Minister and the IOC Chairman three
months ago to register the country's opposition in the matter but it went
unheeded. "It is unfortunate that lawmakers in England are protesting against
Dow's sponsorship of 2012 London Olympics but no step is being taken by the
Centre or the IOC," said Bhopal Group for Information and Action's
Satinath Sarangi.
Some
of the former Indian Olympians branded the Dow sponsorship as “offensive to the spirit
of the Olympic Games” in a press conference held jointly by organisations
fighting for relief for the Bhopal
disaster survivors. Even the Ministry of External Affairs in a letter to the Prime Minister's
Office stated that the company's sponsorship was a very sensitive issue and
there was strong public opinion against it.
TDCC
is in the eye of the storm as the offending factory of Bhopal was owned by the Union Carbide
Corporation (UCC), which is now its wholly-owned subsidiary. The process of
acquisition commenced in 1999 and TDCC acquired UCC as a sequel to a
transaction that closed in 2001 for $11.6 billion. Sebastian Coe, Chairman of
LOCOG, has, therefore, defended the association of Dow with the 2012 Games
stating that its links with the company that was responsible for the Bhopal gas leak came long
after the 1984 tragedy.
He
further stated: “Dow were never the
operators or the owners of that chemical plant in 1984, nor were they the
operators or the owners of the plant in 1989 when the final settlement was
agreed... Dow became the major shareholders in that company only in 2001, some
17 years after the tragedy. And the final settlement was upheld on two separate
occasions by the Indian Supreme Court.”
From
all appearances, Coe is right. Clearly, Dow became the owner of the UCC in 2001
when the latter had no liabilities relating to the Gas Tragedy of 1984 – all
its obligations having been discharged. Had the liabilities persisted Dow might
have refrained from acquiring UCC. Thus, legally speaking, Dow wouldn’t seem to
be involved anyway with the Gas Tragedy. Its ethical liability also would seem
to be extremely tenuous.
Many,
obviously, are accusing it of spending billions on supporting the Olympic
Movement during the next decade yet turning a blind eye to the plight of the
victims of its lately acquired subsidiary’s apathy and neglect. But, legally
that would cut no ice and, hence the song and dance about removal of Dow as a
sponsor appears misplaced.
The recent resignation of
Meredith Alexander, a prominent environmentalist, from membership of the
independent watchdog set up to monitor sustainability of the London Olympics has
created a flutter among the protesters. Alexander resigned over the
controversial deal with Dow which, according to her, had links with Union
Carbide, the company responsible for the Bhopal
gas disaster. But this was promptly squelched by a release by the LOCOG which
asserted that the deal with Dow was on. Obviously, Coe’s contention carried little
weight with LOCOG.
The facts being what they
are, Dow can in no way be held responsible for the plight of the gas victims.
The only entity that needs to be blamed for it is the Congress, which was at
the helm during the relevant period both at the Centre and in Madhya Pradesh,
in whose capital the gas-leak occurred. The reasons are many and worth
considering:
From fishing out a proposal
kept on ice for five years for erection of the chemical plant with obsolete
technology in the ‘70s to allowing its erection in Bhopal and encouraging
building of shanties around it for political gains; for ignoring alarms raised
in the local media about the factory’s shoddy maintenance; for understating the number of deaths to only
15000 which is now proposed to be revised to 25000; for assuring Warren
Anderson, UCC Chairman against his arrest and then smuggling him out of India
after being arrested and charged with manslaughter; for finalising a settlement
for a mere $470 million in 1989 towards compensation for the dead and surviving
after having lodged a claim for $3 billion, simultaneously extinguishing the
rights of the suffering survivors to pursue their claims for compensation; for stopping
remediation of the factory site by UCCs successor company Eveready and taking
it back against the prevailing law exposing surviving shanty-dwellers to
consequential environmental hazards.
Indeed, it was the Congress
that was responsible, ruling, as it did, both at the Centre and the State, right
through these years with most of its decisions being political. Even the current
Congress-led UPA government at the Centre decided against becoming a party in
the ongoing compensation case of the gas victims in US courts, with the Law
Minister stating: “Our courts are competent and capable of resolving (the
matter)”, as if he didn’t know that orders of Indian courts wouldn’t be
enforceable in the US.
Besides, the same government
allowed the Bhopal
Memorial Hospital,
a top-class facility created for the benefit of gas-leak survivors, to go to
seed with many of its departments virtually shut down having been starved of
men and equipment. Congress’s has been a long saga of serving the cause of the
UCC and apathy towards its victims. If our own politicians do us in why blame
others? Why blame Dow? ---INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|