Home arrow Archives arrow Events and Issues arrow Events & Issues 2012 arrow Poor Student Show: INDIA SHINING OR DROWNING?, by Syed Ali Mujtaba, 30 Jan, 2012
 
Home
News and Features
INFA Digest
Parliament Spotlight
Dossiers
Publications
Journalism Awards
Archives
RSS
 
 
 
 
 
 
Poor Student Show: INDIA SHINING OR DROWNING?, by Syed Ali Mujtaba, 30 Jan, 2012 Print E-mail

Events & Issues

New Delhi, 30 January 2012

Poor Student Show

INDIA SHINING OR DROWNING?

By Syed Ali Mujtaba

India celebrated its 63rd Republic Day, like every other year. This time round too it was a grand show at the historic Rajpath in the Capital, Delhi. The pomp and gaiety that marked the occasion showcased the country’s laurels in many spheres of activities. Almost all TV channels gave a chronological description to this date, India’s progress from January 26, 1950 when it adopted its Constitution and became a Republic.

However, the positive blushes may pale into a big smirk when we hear that our 15-year-old students, who were put for the first time on a global stage and tested for their reading, mathematics and science abilities, stood second to last, only beating Kyrgyzstan. The recent results of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Secretariat's Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), ranked India 72nd out of 73 countries!

The PISA results are based on data collected from some 5,00,000 students undergoing two hour tests conducted annually that evaluates the education system worldwide. These are meant to conduct comparative analyses, across vast international contexts, of 15-year-old students for "reading, mathematical and scientific literacy.”

The 2011 survey reports that China’s Shanghai province scored the highest in reading and also topped the charts in mathematics and science. In fact, this Asian power has been on the top for the past several years and it seems the country's youngsters are unbeatable and are far ahead than their counterparts.

The survey noted that more than one-quarter of Shanghai's 15-year-olds demonstrated advance mathematical thinking skills to solve complex problems, compared to an OECD average of just three per cent. In contrast, India’s participants from Tamil Nadu and Himachal Pradesh that showcased the country’s education and development fared miserably at the test. The OECD report notes that this average Indian is over 200 points behind the global topper!  

Comparing scores, it’s estimated that an Indian eighth grader is at the level of a South Korean third grader in mathematics abilities or a second-year student from Shanghai when it comes to reading skills. In the case of scientific literacy levels Tamil Nadu students had a very mean score that was below the means of all OECD countries, but better only than Himachal Pradesh.

As per the report in Himachal Pradesh, 11 per cent of students are estimated to have a proficiency in reading literacy i.e. at or above the baseline level needed to participate effectively and productively in life. Obviously, it follows that 89 per cent of students in Himachal are estimated to be below that baseline level.

The question amongst experts doing the rounds is whether it was a good idea to select these two States to represent India in the PISA programme. Apparently, Tamil Nadu and Himachal Pradesh rank high on human development indicators among the States. The India Human Development Report 2011, prepared by the Institute of Applied Manpower Research (IAMR), categorized them as “median” States, putting them significantly ahead of the national average.

The fact is that the US, the UK, France or say any other developed country from Europe do not top the PISA list in consecutive years. Instead it is the Asian countries that mostly are on top of this standard education test. And, China, South Korea, Hong Kong, Singapore, Japan and UAE are far better than India.

This provides and interesting insight that the image of a world divided neatly into rich and well-educated countries and poor and badly-educated countries is clearly a myth. The fact is that economic development and education are not congruent to each other and the two have little in common.

Additionally, there is another fallacy in this story. While national income and educational achievement are still related; the PISA result show that the two countries, India and China with similar levels of prosperity can produce very different results when it comes to the educational assessment of its school children.

This brings about another presupposition: can India aspire to compete with neighbor China for Asian supremacy, when the stark reality is that its educational standard falls far below the expectation to even meet the Chinese standards.

According to the census 2011, India has 74.04 per cent total literacy (82.12 % males and 65.46 % females). It's a proud moment for a country which had started from 20 per cent national literacy rate in 1950 and is now racing towards 100 per cent target. However, when we put our proud achievement to the global test the fact that comes to hunt us like a bad dream is the country’s poor educational standard.  

Prior to this participation, in 2003 students from Orissa and Rajasthan took a similar standardized international test called “Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS)” and produced comparable results. It ranked India at 46 among 51 nations. The Indian students' score was 392 versus an average of 467 for the group brought to the fore in a Harvard University report "India Shining and Bharat Drowning".

Given the above picture, it can safely be acknowledged that in the second most populous nation on the planet, with the second biggest educational system in the world, the preferred way to bring clarity to a massive, murky educational landscape would be to let statistics paint the picture cleanly and efficiently.

However, to keep the subject in perspective the Indian context is so complex, so multi-dimensional, that trying to understand its depth merely through a numbered tale is not just silly, but detrimental to our ability to work on fixing the wrong.

The two-hour tests cutting across vast socio-economic, linguistic, and ethnic divides tell us little of the context-specific literacy practices from those areas. There are many discrepancies in the test itself that were disadvantageous to the Indian students. In many ways it actually does not truly comprehend the actual knowledge of our students. 

What we end up with are then overbroad characterizations of how poorly the Indian education system is doing, on the basis of large-scale data collection that doesn't tell what's actually going on in the classrooms. This isn't to say that PISA is useless and the data is sheer garbage. The statistics definitely tell us some hard facts about our own educational system.

The Human Development Ministry has reason to be concerned. It has asked the National Council of Education Research & Training (NCERT), to find answers as to why the students fared so poorly. Its Department of Evaluation and Measurement, which was the nodal authority for helping conduct PISA for the students, would obviously need to do a thorough homework and can ill afford to fudge reasons. Clearly, India will have to ramp up its efforts and get serious about what goes on in its schools as better educational outcomes are a strong predictor for future economic growth. ---INFA

(Copyright, India News and Feature Alliance)

< Previous   Next >
 
   
     
 
 
  Mambo powered by Best-IT