Open Forum
New Delhi, 22 December 2011
Retail Saga
WHO BENEFITS TODAY?
By Dharmendra Nath
Widespread misery of potato farmers
across the country from Haryana to Gujarat
again draws our attention to grievous shortcomings of our current retail trade.
Good economic management means good management of production, distribution and
prices. Availability and prices are not a matter of production alone for what
is produced can easily go waste or can be cornered and kept away from the reach
of the market. Distribution is a key factor which affects both production and
prices. Faulty distribution can affect production adversely by withholding
market signals from the producer and prices by creating artificial scarcities.
Hence the pressing need for an
economic policy to concentrate on distribution. Proper distribution not only
ensures availability, but more importantly, it conveys appropriate market
signals to the producer so that he can plan his production accordingly. Should
he produce more or less? Should he produce some thing different? These are
questions best answered by signals thrown up by the market.
Only a few steps from distribution
is the more sophisticated territory of sales and marketing. In sales the
products are just stored and sold to whoever wishes to buy them at that price.
There is no effort at market widening or deepening. For that one has to make an
extra effort of venturing into the territory of marketing. Product, price,
placement and promotion all have a role to play. Each is to be paid attention
and the result can be a dynamic and massive change in market size and shape.
These then cease to be static concepts.
If that is the context, should we be
thinking of plain vanilla distribution or at best sales only and ignore
altogether marketing and the advantages it can bring to the economy? A look at
our traditional retail trade would show that it has mainly been distributing
and selling through the ages. Post independence we introduced mandi (market-yard) auctions to secure
competitive prices for what could reach the mandis.
But we continued with essentially the same old multi-layered mechanism
comprising wholesalers, semi wholesalers, stockists and retailers which rule
the roost today.
Every item travels through that
funnel. It is a boa constrictor grip and every layer of trade adds its margin
to the product cost and sells it for that much more. There is very little
choice for the producer or the consumer.
And the margins added are not small.
There was a time when our Essential Commodities Act talked of 2 per cent whole
sale and 4 per cent retail margin. Nobody is satisfied with that. Today’s
margins are in double digit percentage. There is hardly any self-restraint.
Quite the opposite, the clear message is to charge as much as the market can
bear, with the result that any wage increases in the economy are quickly lapped
up by trade.
Also there is hardly any effort at
market widening, cutting cost or economizing. Those management tools are just
not used. The opportunity is simply lost. What could have been a challenging
and nation-building task is reduced to the level of idle livelihoods. It is for
us to see if we are satisfied with this kind of passive performance.
If the feudal land order which
served us for so long went out because it was slow, passive and outdated, why
should we be persisting with an equally dull feudal commercial order? Is it not
equally outdated, passive and slow?
Let us now see how the operation of
the present order affects us all in the larger society, the producers, the
consumers, the employees and the Government. We keep hearing and reading
documented stories of how producers get only a small fraction of the price
consumers finally pay for a product. The story repeats itself in every glut
season and we just ignore it. Call it the onion story or the potato/tomato
story. It recurs with seasonal regularity. Currently our fields and streets in
several States are littered with unwanted potatoes which cannot even bear the
cost of transportation and digging them out whereas our consumers are agonizing
over their high prices.
The society largely ignores the
misery of the producer because it is the misery of a less vocal and widely
scattered section. Consumers of course pay many times over the price paid to
the producer. They are appeased through token fair price shops while the longer
term strategy always is to wait for the storm to blow over after windfall gains
have been made.
As for employment with the retail
sector, less said the better. Being a part of the unorganized sector it employs
people at very unfair terms with very little job security. A mere look at the
salesmen of the organized sector and at their counterparts in the unorganized
sector makes the difference clear. More than that unorganized retail is the
principal employer of unauthorized child labour. We totally ignore the plight
of the boy who fetches and carries at the retail shop and satisfy our
conscience with a small tip to him. What about his lost childhood, his right to
education?
How about the Government and its tax
collection? There is no proper billing in the retail trade. Hardly any one gives
a bill or a receipt. How does the Government watch over proper tax collection
in this situation is an unresolved mystery.
Now look at organized retail. There
is a vast difference. Prices paid to the producer and charged from the consumer
are recorded. Government taxes are calculated on the bill and clearly shown.
Employees are neatly turned out. There is a marketing effort which can enlarge
the market for many of the products handled. What else do we want?
So, why shouldn’t organized retail
backed by the best technologies in the field of procurement, storage, supply
chain management and cash circulation be given a fair chance? If there is
foreign investment in other key areas, why not in this one too? Or do we think
that we have nothing to learn from others?
An important question relates to the
tremendous clout of the present day retailer in our social set up. The answer
is not far. A portion of what the producer, consumer, employee and Government
are deprived of is paid to political parties who lap it up to run our
democracy. Outside of scams, the retailer is the steadiest source of political
funding. That is the nexus looking for specious arguments to satisfy our
conscience. Can we ever rise above this hullabaloo and get done with it? ---INFA
(Copyright, India
News and Feature Alliance)
|