Open Forum
New
Delhi, 13 July 2011
SC Sets Up SIT
BLACK MONEY NAILED
By Col. (Dr.) P.
K. Vasudeva (Retd)
Three cheers to the Supreme Court
for its unique order on 4 July when it directed the setting up of a Special
Investigating Team (SIT) to monitor the investigations on the issue of black
money. In its 67 pages verdict, a two-member Bench comprising Justices
Sudershan Reddy and Justice S.S Nijjar, demanded stringent action against
Indian nationals who had stashed illegally unaccounted money in foreign banks
and tax havens.
The Bench also ordered the
disclosure of the names and other particulars concerning such persons and their
accounts. Importantly, this historic verdict was the result of a Public
Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Messrs Ram Jethmalani and others, demanding
immediate action on black money hoarded abroad by Indians.
This is not all. The Apex Court has not
only done great justice to the issue of black money, but is also a masterly
treatise on the duties and obligations of the State and the parameters
determining the quality of governance. Along-with the inescapable imperatives
of transparency and accountability to which elected Governments in a democracy
are required to conform.
Pertinently, the order comes against
the backdrop of estimates that India
has the largest numbers of account holders who have illegally salted away
trillions of dollars of ill gotten black money in foreign banks.
Further, the verdict gives a
disturbing account of all the instances of tardiness by the Government in
unearthing black money and its willingness to turn a blind eye to the glaring
malfeasance of the gangs involved in the Government and other public service
personalities (criminals).
It also shows the Government in poor
light vis-à-vis handling of the black money issue within and outside the
country which points a finger towards our present rulers. Worse, it is one of
the most scathing attacks on the UPA Government for dilly-dallying on the
issue.
The Court order states: “Depending
on the volume of such monies, and the number of incidents through which such
monies are generated and secreted away, it may very well reveal the degree of
softness of the State.”
Significantly, the judgment goes
beyond the back money issue and raises the matter whether India is also
becoming a failed State. Quoting from Director on Intra-State Conflict and
Conflict Resolution, Robert Rothberg’s book ‘When States fail: Causes and
Consequences’ the verdict dwells on the features of a failed State, which are
remarkably similar to those present in the country.
Namely, unparalleled economic
opportunity confined to a privileged few, hand-in-glove with the ruling
oligarchy; conspicuous absence of the Government's responsibility to maximise
the well-being and prosperity of all its citizens; and flourishing corruption
--- petty and “lubricating,” on one side, and uncontrollably escalating on an
unusually destructive scale, on the other.
Undoubtedly, the Supreme Court order
on the Government and its investigative and enforcement agencies like
Enforcement Directorate (ED) and Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) conduct
leaves one with the impression that insofar as black money is concerned, all
have not only been negligent of their duties but it also points to deficiency
in service under the Constitution.
Primarily, one of the reasons why
the Jan Lokpal Bill has not been passed in the Parliament for the last over 60
years. True, the doubts would continue to remain even after a ‘watered down’
Bill is passed in the near future, notwithstanding agitations by the civil
society.
The Supreme Court actually gives
blunt expression to its worry on “the extent of (systemic) incapacities …as
well as (those) of ethical nature, (which) go to the very heart of, (and run a
foul of), Constitutional imperatives of governance”.
It minces no words while pointing
out “the lack of seriousness in the efforts of (the Government) is contrary to
the requirements of laws and its Constitutional obligations…. (It) clearly
indicates a compromise of the ability of the State to manage its affairs in
consonance with what is required from a Constitutional perspective…. A
substantial degree of incapacity, in the above respect, would be indicia of the
degree of failure of the State,” it adds with good measure.
In essence, the picture emerging
from the Court Order is of the Government's failure to discharge its functions
in compliance with the provisions of the Constitution. If similar situation had
arisen in respect of a State, it would have led to the imposition of the President
Rule.
The Supreme Court's well-deserved
Order of setting up a SIT with retired Supreme Court judges as the Chairman and
Vice-Chairman and directing the Government to disclose to the petitioners the
names and nature of the action taken, except in regard to investigations which
are yet to be completed, can only mean a verdict which underscores lack of
confidence in the bona fides of the Government. Clearly, the Government has no
one but itself to blame for bringing this rap on itself by its various acts of
omissions and commissions.
On the whole, the judgment has not
only made the nation but also the Supreme Court proud. The people can now heave
a sigh of relief that the truth will finally come out and the economy would get
a big boost once the trillions of dollars illegally stashed in the foreign
banks are brought back to the exchequer. Undeniably, this would put a stop to
future movement of black money out of the country.
The aam aadmi have their fingers
crossed and hope that the SIT will get full cooperation from the Centre and
State Governments for unearthing the illegally stashed ‘peoples’ wealth in
foreign countries. ---- INFA
Copyright, India News and Feature Alliance)
|