Open Forum
New Delhi, 15 June 2011
UN Anti-Sleaze Convention
INDIA FAILS TO LEGISLATE
By Dr. P. K. Vasudeva
As India grapples with the mammoth
scourge of corruption and the Government drags its feet on the Lokpal Bill, New
Delhi stands out as one of the few countries in the world that have not acceded
to the UN Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC).
Remember, this Convention, which
came into force on 14 December 2005 and signed by 140 countries, has not been
fully ratified by India.
More scandalous is the fact that New
Delhi continues to tom-tom it has ratified the
Convention but this cannot be treated as ratified as the Convention’s Articles
make it mandatory for legislations to be brought in.
True, the Government announced the
ratification of the UNCAC on 12 May last which would help in dealing with the
problem of black money and corruption through legislative and administrative
measures. Whereby it would help the Government seize illicit money and assets.
"I have been informed that India
has completed the process of ratification of the UN Convention Against
Corruption," asserted Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.
"The completion of this
ratification process has been under active consideration since September 2010
by a Group of Ministers which is overseeing the ratification process,” he added.
According to the UN Convention, each
member country shall "consider adopting appropriate legislative and
administrative measures, consistent with the objectives of this Convention and
in accordance with the fundamental principles of its domestic law, to prescribe
criteria concerning candidature for and election to public office."
It also prescribes disciplinary or
other measures against public officials who violate the codes or standards
established in accordance with the articles of Convention.
Needless to say, the Task Force on
Financial Integrity and Economic Development welcomed India’s
announcement that it had ratified the UNCAC. Building upon India becoming a member of the Task Force in
January 2011, the ratification comes as part of a broader effort by New Delhi to tackle
corruption and stem the flow of illicit capital flight estimated at about $19
billion per year, the Task Force said in a statement.
Importantly, the Task Force while
welcoming India’s partial
ratification wondered why New Delhi
has not yet brought its domestic laws in line with the international
Convention. Pointing out that nearly six years had elapsed and India still had no legislation in place it underscored
the Union Government’s lack of interest in making India less prone to corruption due
to proper lack of legislation.
According to the UNCAC 51-59 Articles,
the agreement on asset recovery is a major breakthrough and is also the reason
why many developing countries have signed the UNCAC.
Undoubtedly, asset recovery is an
important issue for many developing countries where high-level corruption has
plundered the national wealth. Reaching an agreement on this Chapter involved
intensive negotiations, as the needs of countries seeking illicit assets had to
be reconciled with the legal and procedural safeguards of the countries whose
assistance was sought.
Countries from which return was
likely to be sought, on the other hand, had concerns about the language that
might have compromised basic human rights and procedural protections associated
with criminal liability and freezing, seizure, forfeiture and return of such
assets.
The UNCAC’s ratification would only
be complete when legislations are passed in the Parliament that asset-recovery
of the stashed wealth and property outside the country would be declared public
property under the Convention’s 51-59 Articles.
This is a particularly important
issue for many developing countries like India, where corruption has
plundered national wealth, and where resources are badly needed for
reconstruction and the rehabilitation of the poor and down-trodden. Indeed,
Anna Hazare and Baba Ramdev’s demand is in line with the Convention on asset
recovery and declaration of ill-gotten wealth as public property.
Plainly, acceding to the Convention would
have made it easier for India
to repatriate the billions of dollars in ill-gotten wealth that have been
stashed overseas. Given that Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee has found
himself in complex negotiations with Liechtenstein,
Switzerland and Germany to
bring back looted assets.
Under Article 51 of the Convention, return
of assets to countries of origin is a fundamental principle. But legislation
has to be enacted in the Parliament to this effect as demanded by civil society.
This is not all. An entire chapter
of the Convention is dedicated to prevention, with measures directed at both
the public and private sectors. These include model preventive policies, such
as the establishment of anti-corruption bodies and enhanced transparency in
financing of election campaigns and political parties.
Further, States must endeavour to
ensure that their public services are subject to safeguards. Public servants
would have to be subject to codes of conduct, requirements for financial and
other disclosures and appropriate disciplinary measures.
Scandalously, so far no Bill has
been placed in Parliament, to include the Prime Minister, his Cabinet colleagues,
Parliamentarians, bureaucrats and judiciary for action under the Convention.
Bluntly, the Jan Lokpal Bill under consideration by a committee comprising five
Ministers and civil society members should be in line with the UN Convention.
Moreover, according to Articles
41-45, the Convention criminalises not only basic corruption such as bribery
and embezzlement of public funds but also trading in influence and the
concealment and laundering of the proceeds of corruption.
States the UNCAC: “offences
committed in support of corruption, including money-laundering and obstructing
justice, are also dealt with. Convention offences also deal with the
problematic areas of private sector corruption.” Undeniably, India’s legislation
should also include public and private sector honchos.
Notwithstanding Team Anna Hazare
insisting on the inclusion of Prime Minister, MPs, bureaucrats and judiciary in
the Jan Lokpal Bill in keeping with the UNCAC the Government refuses to relent.
For obvious reasons.
Team Hazare also wants
the Lokpal to be a Constitutional authority like the Chief Election
Commissioner and Controller and Auditor General of India at the Centre and a Lokayukta
in every State.
Clearly, Anna Hazare’s job of Anna
is tough, very tough. First, there will be many hurdles to overcome in
formulating the Bill and second, getting it passed by Parliament by 15th August
2011. Even as the Government tries every
trick to delay the Bill as much as possible for one reason or the other.
But let us hope that with the
support of the aam aadmi and Team
Hazare’s resolute determination the Jan Lokpal Bill will see the light of the
day and India
can say goodbye to corruption. ---- INFA
(Copyright, India
News and Feature Alliance)
|