Round The World
New Delhi, 28 June 2011
India-Pakistan Talks
SAME OLD CBMs STORY
By Monish Tourangbam,
Research Scholar, School of
International Studies (JNU)
The
India-Pakistan Foreign Secretary level talks held recently in Islamabad
give credence to the view that New
Delhi needs to better manage its backyard. Peace and
stability will not be presented on a platter and that the foreign policy team must
take issues head-on. As expected no breakthrough was made. However, the thrust
on confidence building measures (CBMs) did send the message that New Delhi is all
supportive for peace and prosperity in the region, so long as its own is not
threatened.
No
doubt India
has made drastic strides in the global arena in the past two decades. Since
liberalization in the early 90s, it has eventually earned the title of being one
of the fastest growing economies and a major global market. It is one of the
few countries which successfully weathered the global financial crisis and is
today an active member of the influential G20. Since, its entry into the
nuclear club in 1998 and its eventual waiver from the Nuclear Suppliers’ Group
(NSG), it has also emerged as a major hub of international nuclear commerce.
Despite
all this, one cannot deny that India
still has a troublesome neighborhood. The Mumbai attacks devastated Indians
from all walks of life and since then, India-Pakistan relations are slowly
taking baby steps towards some sense of positivity. Pakistan is in the throes
of a heightened sense of insecurity after having suffered a string of attacks
from home-grown terrorists, and tensions have increased in its relations with
the US post the killing of Osama Bin Laden. Moreover, suspicious linkages
between Pakistan’s
spy agency ISI and terrorist elements have hogged the limelight.
In
addition, with the western powers preparing to start decreasing their force
strength, Pakistan’s role in
the future of Afghanistan
is something that needs close attention. In the backdrop of all these concerns,
the recent India-Pakistan dialogue is a welcome step, towards engaging the
country that has concerned India
for most of its independent history. Notably, the recent Secretary-level talks
came up after the much hyped cricket diplomacy, where Prime Minister Manmohan
Singh and his Pakistani counterpart Yousaf Raza Gilani jointly watched the
India-Pakistan semi-final match at Mohali.
Likewise,
post the Fukushima nuclear calamity in Japan, there
has been an overall anxiety over nuclear safety. In the case of Pakistan, questions over the safety of its
nuclear arsenal have often been raised given the state of insecurity and
impunity with which extremists often attack State entities, including a naval
station in Karachi
recently.
Importantly,
both sides have noted the ongoing implementation of
various Nuclear and Conventional CBMs., and decided to convene separate expert-level
meetings to discuss implementation, strengthening of existing arrangements and other
measures, which are mutually acceptable, to build trust, confidence and promote
peace and security. The dates for these meetings will be determined through
diplomatic channels, as per the joint statement.
As expected, both sides played safe
when it came to the issues of terrorism and Kashmir,
as any heated exchanges on these contentious issues would have deadlocked the
entire process. However, during the dialogue, New Delhi
did manage to pass the message that it expected some deliverables from Islamabad when it came to reducing the menace of terrorism
against India.
Foreign Secretary Nirupama Rao stated: “The
ideology of military conflict should have no place in the paradigm of our
relationship of the 21st century. Instead, this relationship should be
characterized by the vocabulary of peace, all round co-operation in the interest
of our people, growing trade and economic interaction, as well as, people to
people contacts - and all this, let me emphasize, in an atmosphere free of
terror and violence.”
Accordingly, Indian concerns regarding
the links between the ISI and terror groups such as Lashkar-e-Taiba were reiterated (pursuant to
the disclosures made by David Headley in the Tahawwur Rana trial), and New
Delhi assured Islamabad that it would hand over
information on the Samjhauta terror probe after thorough investigations. The Pakistani Foreign Secretary Salman Bashir
is reported to have responded: “While we
understand India's
concerns on terror, this issue of terror requires collaborative approach.”
Insofar as the issue of J&K is
concerned, the two sides “agreed to continue
discussions in a purposeful and forward-looking manner with the view to finding
a peaceful solution by narrowing divergences and building convergence.” It was agreed
to convene a meeting of the Working Group on Cross-LoC CBMs to recommend
measures for strengthening and streamlining the existing trade and travel
arrangements across the LoC and propose modalities for introducing additional
Cross-LoC CBMs.
In a welcome development,
liberalized visa norms are under serious consideration. Moreover, both the countries
are likely to work on an agreement to prevent incidents at sea. Apparently, a draft
is already in place. This follows the 'brush' between INS Godavari and PNS
Babur - two ships involved in rescuing MV Suez. Recall that External Affairs
Minister S.M. Krishna had thanked the Pakistani Navy for its timely assistance in
rescuing Indian sailors in captivity of Somali pirates aboard the MV Suez.
On an equally important front, nagging
defence ties between the two countries were taken note of. It is well-known that the military holds a
place of immense importance in Pakistani polity and society. This can be gauged
from the number of military coups that Islamabad has experienced and the military
generals who have held the reins of power. Even under a civilian government, it
is the military which appears to yield real power.
However, if top sources are to be
believed, a significant CBM is coming to fruition between the two armies. Certain
proposals have been made to start new CBMs—meetings between India's National Defence College (NDC) and Pakistan's National
Defence University, joint seminars and conferences between defence
think-tanks, even talks between the two Coast Guards.
Another major issue which needs serious
attention is that Islamabad has always sought to offset its
power asymmetry vis-à-vis India
by taking assistance of external powers. And certain sections of its
establishment have largely resorted to supporting cross-border terrorism in
this pursuit. Notably, countries such as China have taken advantage of the
India-Pakistani rivalry, assisting the latter in various ways to scuttle India’s growth
as a major power.
Clearly, Beijing
intends to restrict India’s
influence in the South Asian region, and benefit from keeping tension alive in India’s neighborhood.
This was quite evident when Secretary Rao, on the eve of her Islamabad
visit reportedly commented that Islamabad’s
efforts in bringing “other factors” into the dialogue would not help address
the issue of normalizing relations between the two countries. On specifically
being asked about Pakistan
seeking to involve China in
its bilateral talks with India
on issues such as demilitarisation of the Siachen glacier, she declared: “It is India and Pakistan that are dealing with each
other to discuss problems that complicate our relationship. I think to bring in
other factors into this dialogue is not really going to address the issue of
normalizing relations that we wantD.”
Well
said. But even though New Delhi
may describe the talks as “productive and positive” at the end, the moot
question to be addressed is: When will there be a dramatic breakthrough? The
next round the talks in New Delhi
is unlikely to throw up an answer.--INFA
(Copyright, India
News and Feature Alliance)
|