Political Diary
New Delhi, 7 May 2011
India: A Soft
State
NOTHING BUT CHEAP
TALK
By Poonam I Kaushish
“Geronimo EKIA…. We got him.” Thus, ended the life of the
world’s most wanted terrorist, Osama bin Laden. Devastatingly and brutally
brought home Monday last when after 10 long years of 9/11, the US tasted
victory. Not only did Operation Osama, the culmination of the War on Terror
showcase to the world what US
patriotism and nationalism is all about, earning it the numero uno Super Power tag. More important, it is a country which neither
forgives nor forgets. Bluntly, don’t-mess-with-me-I’ll-get-you. Eureka!
On the flip side, from the Kargil fiasco, Kandhar humiliation
and Parliament brazen assault to 26/11 Mumbai blood-bath, India’s security
farce continues. While Masood Azhar roams free in Pakistan, ‘death awardee’
Afzal Guru is alive and kicking in jail, Ajmal Kasab is still to be
convicted, Zaki-ur-Rehman Lakhvi and Hafeez Muhammad Saeed continue to spew
venom against India and Pakistan scoffs at New Delhi’s hard rhetoric about
crushing terrorism which ends in a whimper.
Regrettably, our leaders continue to wallow in the false
belief that wars are born in the minds of men ---- won by waving the white flag!
Think, post Washington’s Operation Geronimo, as the clamour for an US-type
operation to revenge Pakistan’s diabolic terrorists’ acts grows, led by Army
Chief VP Singh (India can stage an Abbottabad-type operation), our leaders refuse
to re-draft its Pak policy.
Instead, South Block willy-nilly asserts dialogue with Islamabad is the best option
given the volatile situation in the country. Said Prime Minister Manmohan Singh,
“The Osama episode will not deter will not change the universe of the discourse
between India and Pakistan. Talks
with Pakistan
will continue...” Sic. Adding lamely, even the US
has not broken its ties with Pakistan.
Arguably, is this 'don’t-rock-the-boat-avoid-confrontation'
policy responsible for New Delhi’s
failure to check terrorism, from across the border, North-East and Naxal
country? Do we lack the will for bold, decisive action to defend the country’s
security interests? Is India a soft
state? Yes, a big yes.
Undoubtedly, the polity’s powerlessness to deal with hard
targets strongly has given us the soft State image whereby everyone takes us
for a ride. Worse, the Administration is unable to enforce its writ throughout
the country, a natural sine qua non
of a State. Remember, it is no use having the instruments to enforce law if one
lacks the ability to put them to effective use.
Undoubtedly, New Delhi’s hunger
to build bridges with Islamabad
appears to have blinded the Government to the web of deceit spun by its
duplicitous neighbour. Astonishingly, the Prime Minister turned his cheek to
Pakistan's Foreign Secretary Salman Bashir's blasphemous remarks describing as “outdated”
India's demand for action against the Mumbai perpetrators and warning of
“severe consequences and terrible catastrophe” if it undertook an
Abbottabad-type “misadventure.”
Conveniently forgetting the harsh truth. Talks and terror
cannot co-exist. Pakistan
is a sponsor and user of terror and not its victim. It has not been honest in
its commitment that its territory will not be used for terror. Asserted a senior
South Block official, “Remember, Islamabad
is no pushover, it needs to answer some tough questions. Are they doing enough
on LeT, JeM and Hizbul Mujahideen? The Mumbai trials? On Lakhvi, Saeed et al all
who remain a serious threat to India”?
In fact, many question the utility of an Indo-Pak dialogue
when Islamabad has not delivered on India's demands
on 26/11. “Where was the need for India
to say that it will continue with the dialogue process irrespective of the fact
that Osama bin Laden was protected by Pakistan? India had not
called off the dialogue. It reflects poorly on India's foreign policy. It is
devoid of any strategy, leave alone objective. All these show that our policy
is whimsical and not goal-oriented," said a strategy affairs expert
Indeed, India's
approach has been incoherent over the past two years, in fact bankrupt since
26/11. While a section of the Government favoured talks after Sharm-el-Sheikh,
the Union Home Ministry talked tough on terror. Finally, the Prime Minister,
for reasons best known to him, put the talks back on track by inviting his
counter-part Yousaf Raza Gilani to Mohali as part of cricket diplomacy.
But till date all this has yielded zilch results. Clearly, if New Delhi means business it needs to quickly
do justice in the 26/11 case by sentencing Ajmal Kasab through a speedy trail.
There is no point in asking Pakistan to hand over Hafiz Saeed or Dawood Ibrahim
and speculating on the possibility of a special operation to access them when a
terrorist caught during a terror act of
terror is being used as a poster boy for Indian democracy and justice system.
The time has come for New
Delhi to get its priorities straight and act together.
Our leaders need to show some backbone in punishing terrorists before claiming
to deal with the phenomenon of terrorism. They need to distinguish between
conflict resolution and peace. Make clear that terrorism facing the country is
not co-terminus with the Kashmir problem. Kashmir’s resolution and countering Pak-sponsored
terrorism are two different issues.
Solution of J&K will not automatically defuse the terrorist threat
for India.
Also, work towards evolving a policy that combines open
dialogue with diplomatic pressure. Simply inter-acting, is not a solution.
Talks to improve trade and cultural ties are not instruments to address
terrorism from Pakistan.
Plainly, statements like “Pakistan
should stop harbouring terrorists” are innocuous demands having only rhetorical
value. India
should delineate a time frame with specific demands and spell out viable
consequences if these are not met. Misadventures like Operation Parakaram
(troop mobilization along LoC in 2002) following the attack on Parliament
should be avoided.
Pertinently, perhaps former US
President Nixon had India
on his mind, in his book "The Real War." Said he: “Nations live or
die by the way they respond to the particular challenges they face While might
certainly does not make right, neither does right by itself make might. The
time when a nation most craves ease may be the moment when it can least afford
to let down its guard.
“The moment when it most wishes it could address its
domestic needs may be the moment when it most urgently has to confront an
external threat. The nation that survives is the one that rises to meet that
moment: that has the wisdom to recognize the threat and the will to turn it
back, and that does so before it is too late.”
Clearly, La affair Osama
should awaken New Delhi India into crafting a long-term Pakistan policy
taking national security imperatives into consideration. We need to formulate a
clear-cut regional diplomatic thrust. As also get rid of the naïve notion that
we can preserve peace by exuding goodwill. This is not only stupid but could be
dangerous. It may win New Delhi
accolades but it also tempts the aggressor to be more belligerent.
True, one may not be overtly aggressive but we need to think
and act smart. Have a clear view of where the dangers lie and the responses
necessary to quell the danger. Tough times call for tough action. Above all, our
polity needs to hold the mirror and be truthful. That ‘bankrupt’ practitioners
of third-rate politics do not have the critical first-rate political will and
stomach for making India
into an effective hard State. After all, war can only be won by war! ----- INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|