Political
Diary
New Delhi, 25 February 2011
JPC On 2G Spectrum Scam
WILL IT END LIKE OTHERS?
By Poonam I Kaushish
Its the silly season of loads of brouhaha. Some khatta-meetha,
a little saach-jhooth and a lot of tu-tu-mein-mein about
you-denigrated-the-instititution, no-you-destroyed-it. No guesses, Parliament
of course, the high temple of democracy which hold the record for producing the
largest amount of hot air, farcical theatrics and empty boasts. What’s new?
If one expected a new year, new session with a new
beginning, the hope was belied. The first week was the stereotype usual. By and
large empty benches, dozing MPs who only came ‘alive’ when ‘hot’ issues were
raised. The cause celebre, 2G spectrum scam saw a full Lok Sabha on Thursday last when the Joint Parliamentary
Committee to go into the Rs 1.76 lakh crore swindle was constituted. Followed
by acrimonious accusations between the Treasury Benches and the Opposition over
the genesis of the scandal, during the BJP-led NDA versus Congress-led UPA Governments.
But now that the dust has settled and the Opposition has had
its say and way over setting up of the 30-member strong JPC, the moot point is:
Will it serve any purpose? Is the Government bound by its recommendations? Will
the culprits be nailed? Return the money they have amassed?
All one can do is keep fingers crossed and hope that the JPC
gets to the bottom of unraveling the scam. Sadly, if one goes by the experience
and outcome of the four earlier JPCs set-up, there is not much one can look
forward to. Primarily because even as the JPC recommendations have persuasive
value, the Committee cannot force the Government to take any action on the
basis of its report.
It is entirely the Government prerogative and discretion to
launch fresh investigations on the basis of a JPC report. According to rules
the Government is only required to report on the follow-up action taken on the
basis of the recommendations of the JPC and other committees. The committees
then submit ‘Action Taken Reports’ in Parliament on the basis of the
Government’s reply. These reports can be discussed in Parliament and the
Government can be questioned on the basis of the same.
Importantly, as records show the earlier four JPCs have been
quite disappointing in establishing what happened and in identifying and
punishing those culpable. Recall, the first was instituted to inquire into the
Bofors contract on 6 August 1987. The Committee, headed by B Shankaranand, held
50 sitting, but was lame duck as the Opposition boycotted committee hearings on
grounds that it was packed with Congress members. Needless to say when the
report was tabled in both Houses of Parliament August 1988, it was rejected by
the Opposition.
The second JPC, headed by former Union Minister and senior
Congress leader Ram Niwas Mirdha, was set up to probe irregularities in
securities and banking transactions in the aftermath of ‘big bull’ Harshad
Mehta scandal which led to a steep over 500 point fall in the Sensex in July
1992. The recommendations of this JPC too were neither accepted in full nor
implemented.
The third JPC was assigned to probe the Ahmedabad-based
cooperative bank, Madhavpura Mercantile Cooperative Bank’s big exposure to the
stock market through the “K-factor” nee Ketan Parekh. Set up on 26 April 2001
with senior BJP MP Prakash Mani Tripathi as Chairman, the JPC held 105 sittings
and gave its report on 19 December 19 2002. However, the Government did not
accept the sweeping changes in stock market regulations made by the Committee
but also diluted many of its suggestions.
The last JPC was set up in August 2003 to look into
pesticide residues in soft drinks, fruit juice and to set safety standards. The
Committee, headed by NCP supremo Sharad Pawar confirmed that soft drinks did
have pesticide residues and recommended stringent norms for drinking water.
Alas, nothing came of this too.
Forget the JPCs, the fate of various other Parliamentary
committees reports are no better. Piles and piles of reports on various Union
Ministries gathering dust in the corridors of Parliament bear mute testimony
that voluminous paper reams make not even an iota of difference. Buried beneath
lies the forgotten truth of a committee system launched with great fan fare in
March 1993 by the then Lok Sabha Speaker Shivraj Patil.
These were intended to save the time of the House by
offering our MPs’ an opportunity to ensure greater accountability of the
Government to Parliament through a closer look at its working. As also to
facilitate in-depth consideration of issues, which involve technical points and
are difficult to be thrashed out on the floor of the Houses.
Appropriately, the three-month-long Budget session is now
split into two, with a fortnight’s recess in between. The recess is provided to
enable the MPs as the members of the standing committees to go through with a
toothcomb the annual budgets of various ministries and departments and their
demands for grants and make recommendations, something which the two Houses as
a whole could do only cursorily.
Sadly, however, our MPs view the recess as a fun-time break
and feel they have better things to do. Often even ensuring the quorum of 17
MPs in the 45-odd member committee, becomes an uphill task. Most members merely
put in an appearance, sign their attendance and quietly disappear. The reason?
This entitles them to bunk meetings and yet draw an allowance of Rs 1000 per
day.
More, scandalous is that while committees should be meeting
all the ten working days of the two weeks, from 11 am to 6 pm as in the case of
the two Houses, this does not happen. What is worse, some committees do not
even have a full sitting. They meet for just an hour or two!
One basic question arises: Are the Committees, specially the
JPC any use if their valuable suggestions never get to be discussed or
translated into Government action? More important, how would it unravel any
swindle if the JPC cannot summon and question the perpetrators?
Look at the absurdity. The Parliament is sovereign. It
allows even the dumbest of MPs the right to ask the Prime Minister a question
and he has per force to answer. Yet
the Prime Minister cannot be summoned or questioned by a JPC investigating a
case of national importance.
Thus, it is imperative that India gets rid of its colonial
hangover and allows the Prime Minister and Ministers to be present in the
meetings of the Committees, as in the UK, as much could be gained. The
Ministers would then be available to answer all the queries and respond across
the table to various suggestions, instead of learning about the discussions
second hand from their officers attending the meetings.
In sum, the coming days are crucial. One hopes the JPC on
the Raja spectrum scam will help erase some corruption taint and restore the
people faith in our parliamentary system. Our Government should ensure that the
aam aadmi gets the full value of the
huge amount of money it spends on the system. Parliament needs to be
strengthened and its functioning made more effective vis-a-vis the Government. The success of the JPC would give a
promising dimension to Parliamentary control over the Government and enable
Indian democracy to deliver. Is the UPA willing to let truth prevail? ---- INFA
(Copyright, India News and Feature Alliance)
|