Open Forum
New Delhi, 7 December 2010
More Than The PAC
JPC VITAL FOR TRUTH
By Shivaji Sarkar
The
reticence on not having the Joint Parliamentary Committee for probing the Rs
1.76 lakh crore 2G scam has stalled Parliamentary proceedings for over three weeks.
The Opposition
led by the BJP has exemplified rare unity with the Left, AIADMK, Samajwadi and
other Parties joining issue over unravelling the mystery that involves large
corporate groups. The CAG has done the basics to point out how the Government
has been deprived of the funds that could have easily come to the exchequer.
The Congress
has made the stalling of both the Houses an issue of “ethics”. Its MPs are
trying to denigrate the Opposition by posturing that they would forego their
daily allowances. The Congress is also trying to emphasise that the nation is
losing massive sums every day as the House proceedings are not allowed to be
held.
These are
good arguments. There is only one mistake in the calculations. Parliament
spends massive sums to run its offices, in staff salaries, security, library
and other paraphernalia every day whether the Houses are in session or not. Also,
many House committees meet during the recess. The Speaker, Dy Speaker of the Lok
Sabha, Vice-President and Dy Chairman of the Rajya Sabha, Prime Minister and Leaders’
of Opposition of both Houses continue to function uninterrupted. So do the Chairmen
of various House committees.
The campaign
on expenses tries to portray as if Parliament does not spend any money when the
Houses are not in session. That is not the truth. During the session what
Parliament spends in addition to its normal outflows is on MPs allowances.
Forgetting that MPs, who are members of various committees, are also paid
sitting allowances at the same rate.
So why this
shrill cry on an issue which is not the truth? How is the cost of the session
per day calculated? If it is virtually the gross annual Parliamentary
expenditure divided by 365 days then it is a very inappropriate way of
calculation. In fact, the cost of a session is minimal if the normal expenditures
are seen in perspective. Clearly this is to mislead the nation.
Besides, there
is nothing abnormal in disrupting the Houses. The rules provide for it. There
are clear provisions for walk-outs to mark protests. Stalling the Houses is a
democratic method and a Parliamentary practice to air grievances and draw
attention of the authorities and the nation to some grave issues like the 2G
scam. It is far inexpensive to stall the
House proceedings than blocking roads and rail traffic across the country to
force it to adopt the path of probity.
Some
television and newspapers without studying the Parliamentary practices join the
raucous dishing out inappropriate figures to malign the politicians. The media
needs to realise that its job is to inform and not digress. Unfortunately, a
large section of the media is doing only that. It needs to strengthen the
process of protest against issues that rock the nation and drain its coffers.
Further, the
Fourth Estate needs to know that statistics on Parliament do not total
democracy. Questionably, who is responsible for stories like 114 hours lost
during the winter session costing Rs 25 crore? Some raise the bogey that MPs
“should spend time debating bills brought by the Government”.
This
approach is demeaning the office of the MP. A Right Honourable is not a servant
of the Government. He has a more onerous duty to question the Administration for
the betterment of democracy and its functioning. The right to protest makes
that possible.
This is not
all. The Press has become a partner in another disinformation campaign. It has
been trying to float the idea that the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) headed
by a senior Opposition MP, presently BJP’s Murli Manohar Joshi can do a
detailed inquiry.
The PAC is
the apex auditing body. The CAG reports are vetted by it. It has the right to
accept, reject or settle the objections raised by the CAG. But its
investigative powers are outlined by the CAG report. It has to move on the
lines of the audit report done by it. Some digression and some additional
inquiries are possible but beyond that there are limitations.
Further, the
CAG reports suffer from a basic infirmity. Its mandate is limited to auditing Government
organisations. In the process, if some private organisations come in the way
the CAG can mention that in its reports. But it does not have the powers to
investigate the operations, functions and the modus operandi of the private
corporate or any other organisation.
This is the
job of the criminal investigating agencies, which presently the CBI is doing.
This is not part of the CAG report. The PAC cannot jump the gun. The basic CAG
report sets its contours. This means a wider investigation beyond the Government
or public sector organisations is not in its ambit.
This is the
objection of the Opposition. The JPC on the Harshad Mehta stock market scam was
primarily to unravel the modus operandi of different public and private sector
organisations, loopholes in the rules, the lack of a regulator, lax banking
sector rules and the free-for-all stock market operations. The JPC report
established certain norms and led to the setting up of the stock market
regulator SEBI. It has been able to streamline stock market functions to an
extent.
This is what
the Opposition is demanding. There is nothing in the demand to suggest it is
against the Government. The demand is to set the rules of the game for the telecom
sector. Given that the fast changing technology has severe monetary
ramifications. Undoubtedly, this is a grey area that requires insight. Which the limited PAC
probe cannot do.
It is
difficult to understand why the Government should take the demand for the JPC
as an onslaught against it. The Government needs to be more transparent and honest,
more than the Opposition. It has to run the show while the Opposition merely
helps it do so. The demand for a JPC is aimed at that.
Would the Government
specify how the PAC would probe the role of many of the corporate giants who
ostensibly have made big money? Some of them are known to have resold the
spectrum, at prices many times higher than what they had purchased from the Telecom
Ministry. Even if the PAC were to go beyond its mandate, what guarantee that its
Constitutional power would not be questioned?
Thus, it is
time the Government accepts the Opposition demand for setting up the JPC. As
the JPC’s mandate is set by the Government and Opposition with Parliamentary
authority. The JPC enjoys wider powers to summon anybody from anywhere and
investigate the involvement and modus operandi of the largest corporate groups.
Every delay
is likely to help the culprit wipe off the pugmarks. The Government had not
lost anything in any of the previous JPCs. Particularly, as every JPC helps
strengthen the process of governance.
The debates
should not be restricted to scoring brownie points in the Press. The issue is
much graver and needs a solution at the national level. The JPC alone can set
those rules and not the PAC. Let us go for it. ---- INFA
(Copyright, India News & Feature
Alliance)
|