Economic Highlights
New Delhi, 9 July 2010
FDI In Retail
HIT SOCIAL
DYNAMICS, PENURY, JOB LOSS
By Shivaji Sarkar
A growing economy
has its challenges and anxieties. The challenge it faces is the attraction and
the anxiety whether it would be a boon or a bane. The proposal of opening up of
the retail sector in toto --- multi-brand ---- has once again raked up the old
question. More so, when an Industry Ministry discussion paper, subsequent to Commerce
Minister Anand Sharma’s US visit, states: “Foreign direct investment
(FDI) in retail may be an efficient means of addressing the concerns of farmers
and consumers”.
A question the
country has been discussing for over a decade. Gradually it opened FDI in single
brand retail products and part of the wholesale trade. The multi-national
giants are now on to expanding their empire in India as it assures them not only a
large market but also very high profits with least regulations. They want to
have the maximum benefits in an economy that is tipped to be the third largest
in terms of GDP by 2050.
In recent years, the
destination sectors in FDI have became more varied. FDI inflows have
shifted from infrastructure, natural resources and export- driven manufacturing
to other areas such as retailing, tourism, construction and off-shore
services.
A World Bank study
showed that cumulative FDI inflows to the retail sector in the 20 largest
developing countries amounted to US$ 45 billion in 1998-2002 (about 7% of the
total of these countries). The study showed that after liberalization;
countries such as Brazil, Poland and Thailand have received significant
FDI in retailing.
The lure of FDI is
potential bait. Those in favour say that it would spruce up the retail sector,
make the prices competitive, standardize products and free the people of many
“unscrupulous” small retailers. The organised retailing comprises 2% of the
country’s business. It has grown to 40% in Brazil
and 20% in China
in the last 10 years with the injection of foreign money and operations of MNC
chains.
India has the largest number of retail traders, 1.5 crore. This may not look
organised in MNC terms but the trading community has evolved an ethos that
controls and serves the consumers even in the remotest parts of the country.
These are largely self-employed family units, which employ up to 10 persons. According
to varied estimates about 3 to 4 crore people are employed in the sector. They
cater to 98% of the retail business worth Rs 382,000 crore as per Government
estimates in 2002-03.
Some experts aver
the figures could be more. Most of the employed persons are not highly educated
and are semi-skilled. But together they are estimated to support about 20 crore
people, 1/5 of the population.
The biggest concern
dogging this community is whether the large organised chains would be able to
support such a large section of the population. The large chains are known to
economise on their operations, mechanise and employ fewer people.
Those who argue that
retailers who close their shops would be employed by the big chains is a myth. It
is a pernicious idea to turn self-employed entrepreneurs into salaried
employees.
A US study, Wal-Mart
and Rural Poverty by Stephan J Goetz and Hema Swaminathan of Pensylvania State
University’s Agricultural Economics and
Rural Sociology department, found that Wal-Mart
unequivocally raised family poverty rates in US counties (districts) during the 1990s. Another researcher E
Basker, after studying the Wal-Mart effect on 1749 counties, noted, “Wal-Mart entry has a small positive
effect on retail employment at the county level while reducing the number of
small retail establishments in the county.”
A similar study by the Economic and Political Weekly’s Anuradha
Kalhan in Mumbai found that shops and establishments close to malls or large
retail chains suffered fall in sales. The small retailers also sacked their
employees. Importantly, it is not the number of people retrenched but the fall
in family income where a decline in sales is not matched by retrenchment and results
in shrinking earnings per head. “If the downward pressures continue to
intensify, some more retrenchments may occur; however, closures seem imminent”,
Kalhan observes.
Thus FDI in retail is not an economic or volatile political
proposition. It is likely to impact social dynamics and reduce many self
–employed people to penury. The US
studies also noted that initially the MNCs provide more benefits to consumers
but once small retail outlets closed down they fleece more. In India, it is
well-known that an FMCG company has monopolized production to sales and is
earning 40% profit. Is such high profit really in the interest of the farmer
and consumer?
It was also observed that the big retail houses subtly cartelize
and restrict competition to themselves. Studies in UK found that as large chains grew,
the number of retail outlets during 1981-99 came down from 56862 to 25800. In Europe,
during 1970-80, about four lakh retail shops closed down. Some of the fast food chains captured almost all the business
in Norway 99%, Switzerland 88%, Sweden 94%; UK 64% and Portugal 57%.
The impact of limited FDI in the retail
sector has produced the results of the Mumbai study. If it is allowed freely,
the impact may be devastating for society and would extend to the farm sector.
The lure and need of foreign
investment has to be weighed in terms of the actual benefits along-with probable
damages to the society. The benefits cannot and should not be viewed in
monetized terms. Many benefits do not have a direct monetary aspect. But its
loss is tremendous in terms of psychological, physical, self-esteem et al. Even
China
is facing social upheaval as small shops are closing down in various cities.
Before taking a decision let the
country not merely see the growth of organized retail but also evaluate the
contribution of the unorganized retail sector to the organised growth of the
country. As it takes the crucial decision, the powers-that-be might institute a
study on the impact of organized retail entry in China. ---- INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|