Economic Highlights
New Delhi, 18 June 2010
Integrated Water Policy
CAN ECONOMY GROW SANS IT?
By Shivaji Sarkar
The death of the Sultanpur lake in Haryana has raised a
national debate. The focus is over water availability in the country as also
its uses particularly in industry and agriculture. The big concern is if water
bodies go on dying like that would the industry, agriculture and economy grow
as projected?
Consensus largely is that it would not. Besides, it is just
not the case of an isolated lake but that countrywide there has been a concern
over training and tunneling of river streams, changing river courses and
high-irrigation backed agriculture. Industry has not only been a water guzzler
but also the worst polluter turning many major and minor streams into caustic nullahs.
The green
revolution has largely ignored low-water using plants and created a kind of
mono-culture in terms of food. The low-water using foods like millet, jowar and bajra are less cultivated. Only last year owing to severe rainfall
shortage there have been reports of higher millet cultivation.
The World
Bank and the United Nations have come out with many studies stressing backing up
crops that could use less water. The statistics that rice and wheat use
staggering quantity of water has added to the concern. The reports have backed
cultivation of crops and also varieties of wheat and rice that are less water
demanding.
It is
just not in India, worldwide
too many fresh and brackish water lakes are either drying up or shrinking
including the Dead Sea and Aral Sea. Even
evaporation from the Aswan Dam lake in Egypt has accelerated.
Thus
experts have given a call for a change in agricultural practices not only to
conserve water but also to increase food yields for a population growing beyond
a billion. India
has to evolve a policy not only for itself but also for global food security.
Any imbalance as it has been witnessed during the past few years leads to
global food shortage and severe inflationary situation. However, it is difficult
to ascribe the food inflation in the country to this alone.
There are
other reasons including manipulation of food stocks, hoarding and practices of
large MNC retail chains that lead to severe wastage of packed foods. Stress on
processed and packed foods has also deleterious effect on the food availability
as well as its impact on ecology and water bodies.
Though
largely the discussion has been centred on high water uses in agriculture less
has been talked about the industry. While agriculture definitely has to match
the changing climatic pattern, there has been little debate on the industry
that not only is increasing its water needs but also is polluting the fresh
water sources across the country
In the
past several decades, industrial production has increased in India owing to
an increasingly open economy and greater emphasis on industrial development and
international trade. Water consumption for this sector has consequently risen
and will continue growing at a rate of 4.2 per cent per year (World Bank,
1999). According to the World Bank, demand for industrial, energy production
and other uses will rise from 67 billion cubic metre to 228 billion cubic metre
by 2025.
The
industry which has entrenched itself deeply into politics has not tried to come
out with a low-water use policy. High profit motives have driven it leading to
unsustainable health and hygiene conditions across industrial belts. The impact
goes beyond and has known to have sullied farms, irrigation sources and major
water bodies. Ultimately, it affects agriculture and food yields.
Policy
formulations have been isolated for pollution norms and never been looked at in
an integrated manner. The approach that industry has little to do with
agriculture is faulted. It is dependent for its survival on a good crop and it
has been witnessed across the world that farm yields decide consumption and
industrial production pattern.
It also
requires a river basin/watershed and/or irrigation system perspective for resource
management decisions. This would help to avoid situations where, although
individual operations on a given farm may be very efficient, the cumulative
effects of many farms undermine the capacity of freshwater resources and
ecosystems to provide long-term, sustainable services for people. A river basin
perspective also enables ecological flow regimes to be defined that conserve
biodiversity and ensure continued related goods and services for human
population.
The
Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture (CA), an ambitious
programme co-sponsored by the Consultative Group on International Agriculture
Research (CGIAR) pulled together the work of 700 experts over a five year
period. The programme took stock of the past 50 years of water development to
determine what future actions would be needed for the next 50 years.
Fresh water usage from existing river basins has already
been stretched to the limits, with no possibility of more of it being available
to produce the additional food the world may need over the next decades. This
future scenario looks gloomy as population in the region is food insecure even
at the current levels of food production; raising their consumption levels
would itself entail considerable additional need for fresh water, the report
finds.
Policy impetus for watershed management hasn't translated
into effective results during the past three decades. A case in point is the
finding of the Parthasarathy Committee, constituted by India's
Ministry of Rural Development. The committee's report, released in January
2006, concluded that “watershed programmes have been bureaucratically driven
and mechanically implemented with focus on 'outlays rather than outcomes' and
'accounting rather than accountability”. The Food & Agriculture
Organisation (FAO), in its recent regional assessments of watershed programmes,
argues that many watershed programmes suffer from inherent inertia to transform
the rain-fed areas. What it does not say is that many of the programmes have
failed due to collusion between bureaucrats and industrialists.
Interestingly, many of these issues are becoming
international as the recent controversies on Chenab and Sutlej waters between India and Pakistan is slated to be turned
into international disputes.
Somehow, neither the Planning Commission nor any other Government
agency has started treating controversies on water in a holistic manner.
Industry, agriculture, food practices and pollution are all treated separately.
Bureaucracy in each ministry tries to protect the interests of each of the
different groups.
The Government therefore has to change its approach and
evolve a policy on water which takes the primary interest of agriculture but must
stress on the efficient use and diversified low-water use crops. Industrial,
urban, rural and all other needs have to be taken into account so that the
nation progresses as targeted beyond 2050, when most of us would not be around.
---INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|